Cargando…

Brain-based mind reading for lawyers: reflecting on possibilities and perils

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Claydon, Lisa
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:	Peer Commentary
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29869635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsx032

Ejemplares similares

Some questions about brain-based mind reading in forensic psychiatry
por: Glannon, Walter
Publicado: (2017)

Call in the lawyers: mitigating the Global Gag Rule
por: Roose-Snyder, Beirne, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The brain, cognitive enhancement devices, and European regulation
por: Kuersten, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Environmental neuroethics: changing the environment—changing the brain Recommendations submitted to the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
por: Illes, Judy, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Mindful Lawyering: a Pilot Study on Mindfulness Training for Law Students
por: Rosky, Clifford J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Egg freezing, stratified reproduction and the logic of not
por: Ikemoto, Lisa C.
Publicado: (2015)

Statistical Rigor and the Perils of Chance
por: Button, Katherine S.
Publicado: (2016)

Integrating Lawyers Into Perinatal Care Teams to Address Unmet, Health-Harming Legal Needs
por: Patchen, Loral, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Lawyers and Doctors
Publicado: (1910)

The Lawyer and the Doctor
por: Winter, Jno. G.
Publicado: (1899)

Statistics for lawyers
por: Finkelstein, Michael O, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Statistics for lawyers
por: Finkelstein, Michael O, et al.
Publicado: (2001)

Statistics for lawyers
por: Finkelstein, Michael O, et al.
Publicado: (1990)

Lawyers at work
por: Cosslett, Clare
Publicado: (2012)

Justice and Nonverbal Communication in a Post-pandemic World: An Evidence-Based Commentary and Cautionary Statement for Lawyers and Judges
por: Denault, Vincent, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Hemodialysis Vascular Access: The Perils and Potentials
por: Banerjee, D., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comment on mitochondrial replacement techniques and the birth of the ‘first’
por: Dimond, Rebecca, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Shifting the focus in the legal analysis of the first MST case
por: González-Santos, Sandra P
Publicado: (2017)

Bite mark evidence: bite mark analysis is not the same as bite mark comparison or matching or identification
por: Souviron, Richard, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Disappearing women, vanishing ladies and property in embryos
por: Dickenson, Donna L.
Publicado: (2017)

Science wars—How much risk should soldiers be exposed to in military experimentation?
por: Savulescu, Julian
Publicado: (2015)

Dehumanization: its operations and its origins
por: Simpson, Robert Mark
Publicado: (2015)

Orphan drug incentives in the pharmacogenomic context: policy responses in the USA and Canada
por: Herder, Matthew
Publicado: (2016)

Hate speech, volition, and neurology
por: Roginsky, Alexandra B., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Neuroscience cannot answer these questions: a response to G. and R. Murrow's essay hypothesizing a link between dehumanization, human rights abuses and public policy
por: Hoffman, Morris B.
Publicado: (2015)

Buttressing regulation of cognitive enhancement devices with principles of harm reduction
por: Fitz, Nicholas S., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: commentary
por: Johnson, Reuben, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Medical regulation of cognitive enhancement devices: some concerns
por: King, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Outstanding questions concerning the regulation of cognitive enhancement devices
por: De Ridder, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Law and neuroscience: recommendations submitted to the President's Bioethics Commission
por: Jones, Owen D., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Letter
Publicado: (2014)

Ethical considerations of neuroscience research and the application of neuroscience research findings for the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
Publicado: (2014)

Considering advances in neuroscience through the lenses of law and human rights
por: Frankel, Mark S.
Publicado: (2014)

‘Good soldiers are made, not born’(⊥): the dangers of medicalizing ability in the military use of genetics
por: Roberts, Jessica L.
Publicado: (2015)

Yesterday's war; tomorrow's technology: peer commentary on ‘Ethical, legal, social and policy issues in the use of genomic technologies by the US military’
por: Evans, Nicholas G., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Military genomic testing: proportionality, expected benefits, and the connection between genotypes and phenotypes
por: Pence, Charles H.
Publicado: (2014)

The most plausible pro-coercion view: requiring informed agreement while penalizing non-participation in research
por: Barnhill, Anne
Publicado: (2015)

Informed consent to participation in interventional studies: second-order in a different sense
por: Eyal, Nir
Publicado: (2015)

Two kinds of rule regulating human subjects research
por: Sachs, Benjamin
Publicado: (2015)

Are ethics promulgations self-defeating?
por: Gray, Derrick
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_riaq0pjr1us1c02m6dcept2kf5