Cargando…
Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data
In this study, we address the question whether (and to what extent, respectively) altmetrics are related to the scientific quality of papers (as measured by peer assessments). Only a few studies have previously investigated the relationship between altmetrics and assessments by peers. In the first s...
Autores principales: | Bornmann, Lutz, Haunschild, Robin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29791468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197133 |
Ejemplares similares
-
How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data
por: Haunschild, Robin, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers
por: Haunschild, Robin, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Field- and time-normalization of data with many zeros: an empirical analysis using citation and Twitter data
por: Haunschild, Robin, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single researchers in a single graph
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2017)