Cargando…

The fecal bacterial microbiota of bats; Slovenia

METHODS: Fecal samples were collected from 92 bats in Slovenia, consisting of 12 different species, and the bacterial microbiota was assessed via next generation sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene V4 region. RESULTS: Sequences were assigned to 28 different phyla, but only Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vengust, Modest, Knapic, Tea, Weese, J. Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29791473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196728
_version_ 1783325379170140160
author Vengust, Modest
Knapic, Tea
Weese, J. Scott
author_facet Vengust, Modest
Knapic, Tea
Weese, J. Scott
author_sort Vengust, Modest
collection PubMed
description METHODS: Fecal samples were collected from 92 bats in Slovenia, consisting of 12 different species, and the bacterial microbiota was assessed via next generation sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene V4 region. RESULTS: Sequences were assigned to 28 different phyla, but only Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria accounted for ≥1% of sequences. One phylum (Proteobacteria), one class (Gammaproteobacteria), three orders (Pseudomonadales, Lactobacillales, Bacillales), four families (Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonadaceae, Staphylococcaceae, Carnobacteriaceae), and five genera (Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Carnobacterium, an unclassified Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter) accounted for 50% of sequences. There were no significant differences in the relative abundances of any phyla between bat species, but various differences were noted at lower taxonomic levels, such as Enterobacteriaceae (P = 0.007, most abundant in M. blythii), Pseudomonadaceae (P = 0.007, most abundant in Rhinolophus hipposideros) and Chlamydiaceae (P = 0.04, most abundant in Myotis myotis). There were significant differences in richness between species in both adults and juveniles/subadults, but there was no impact of sex on any alpha diversity index. When only adults are considered, there were significant differences in community membership between M. blythii and M. emarginatus (P = 0.011), and M. blythii and R. hipposideros (P = 0.004). There were also significant differences in community structure between M. blythii and M. emarginatus (P = 0.025), and M. blythii and R. hipposideros (P = 0.026). When adults of the four main species were compared, 14 OTUs were identified as differentially abundant using LEfSe. Only one difference was identified when comparing R. hipposideros adults and juvenile/subadults, with Klebsiella over-represented in the younger bats. CONCLUSIONS: Bats have a complex and diverse microbiota with a high relative abundance of Proteobacteria. The relevance of this difference is unclear and requires further study. Differences in the microbiota were observed between bat species, perhaps reflecting different diets and environmental exposures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5965822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59658222018-06-02 The fecal bacterial microbiota of bats; Slovenia Vengust, Modest Knapic, Tea Weese, J. Scott PLoS One Research Article METHODS: Fecal samples were collected from 92 bats in Slovenia, consisting of 12 different species, and the bacterial microbiota was assessed via next generation sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene V4 region. RESULTS: Sequences were assigned to 28 different phyla, but only Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria accounted for ≥1% of sequences. One phylum (Proteobacteria), one class (Gammaproteobacteria), three orders (Pseudomonadales, Lactobacillales, Bacillales), four families (Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonadaceae, Staphylococcaceae, Carnobacteriaceae), and five genera (Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Carnobacterium, an unclassified Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter) accounted for 50% of sequences. There were no significant differences in the relative abundances of any phyla between bat species, but various differences were noted at lower taxonomic levels, such as Enterobacteriaceae (P = 0.007, most abundant in M. blythii), Pseudomonadaceae (P = 0.007, most abundant in Rhinolophus hipposideros) and Chlamydiaceae (P = 0.04, most abundant in Myotis myotis). There were significant differences in richness between species in both adults and juveniles/subadults, but there was no impact of sex on any alpha diversity index. When only adults are considered, there were significant differences in community membership between M. blythii and M. emarginatus (P = 0.011), and M. blythii and R. hipposideros (P = 0.004). There were also significant differences in community structure between M. blythii and M. emarginatus (P = 0.025), and M. blythii and R. hipposideros (P = 0.026). When adults of the four main species were compared, 14 OTUs were identified as differentially abundant using LEfSe. Only one difference was identified when comparing R. hipposideros adults and juvenile/subadults, with Klebsiella over-represented in the younger bats. CONCLUSIONS: Bats have a complex and diverse microbiota with a high relative abundance of Proteobacteria. The relevance of this difference is unclear and requires further study. Differences in the microbiota were observed between bat species, perhaps reflecting different diets and environmental exposures. Public Library of Science 2018-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5965822/ /pubmed/29791473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196728 Text en © 2018 Vengust et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vengust, Modest
Knapic, Tea
Weese, J. Scott
The fecal bacterial microbiota of bats; Slovenia
title The fecal bacterial microbiota of bats; Slovenia
title_full The fecal bacterial microbiota of bats; Slovenia
title_fullStr The fecal bacterial microbiota of bats; Slovenia
title_full_unstemmed The fecal bacterial microbiota of bats; Slovenia
title_short The fecal bacterial microbiota of bats; Slovenia
title_sort fecal bacterial microbiota of bats; slovenia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29791473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196728
work_keys_str_mv AT vengustmodest thefecalbacterialmicrobiotaofbatsslovenia
AT knapictea thefecalbacterialmicrobiotaofbatsslovenia
AT weesejscott thefecalbacterialmicrobiotaofbatsslovenia
AT vengustmodest fecalbacterialmicrobiotaofbatsslovenia
AT knapictea fecalbacterialmicrobiotaofbatsslovenia
AT weesejscott fecalbacterialmicrobiotaofbatsslovenia