Cargando…

Identifying county characteristics associated with resident well-being: A population based study

BACKGROUND: Well-being is a positively-framed, holistic assessment of health and quality of life that is associated with longevity and better health outcomes. We aimed to identify county attributes that are independently associated with a comprehensive, multi-dimensional assessment of individual wel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roy, Brita, Riley, Carley, Herrin, Jeph, Spatz, Erica S., Arora, Anita, Kell, Kenneth P., Welsh, John, Rula, Elizabeth Y., Krumholz, Harlan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29791476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196720
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Well-being is a positively-framed, holistic assessment of health and quality of life that is associated with longevity and better health outcomes. We aimed to identify county attributes that are independently associated with a comprehensive, multi-dimensional assessment of individual well-being. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study examining associations between 77 pre-specified county attributes and a multi-dimensional assessment of individual US residents’ well-being, captured by the Gallup-Sharecare Well-Being Index. Our cohort included 338,846 survey participants, randomly sampled from 3,118 US counties or county equivalents. FINDINGS: We identified twelve county-level factors that were independently associated with individual well-being scores. Together, these twelve factors explained 91% of the variance in individual well-being scores, and they represent four conceptually distinct categories: demographic (% black); social and economic (child poverty, education level [<high school, high school diploma/equivalent, college degree], household income, % divorced); clinical care (% eligible women obtaining mammography, preventable hospital stays per 100,000, number of federally qualified health centers); and physical environment (% commuting by bicycle and by public transit). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve factors across social and economic, clinical care, and physical environmental county-level factors explained the majority of variation in resident well-being.