Cargando…
Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to determine the effects of gadolinium contrast agent on right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) volumetric, aortic flow and pulse wave velocity (PWV) quantification using manual, semi-automatic and fully automatic analysis techniques. METHODS: 61 participant...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29271236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170717 |
_version_ | 1783325402662436864 |
---|---|
author | Fathi, Amir Weir-McCall, Jonathan R Struthers, Allan D Lipworth, Brian J Houston, Graeme |
author_facet | Fathi, Amir Weir-McCall, Jonathan R Struthers, Allan D Lipworth, Brian J Houston, Graeme |
author_sort | Fathi, Amir |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to determine the effects of gadolinium contrast agent on right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) volumetric, aortic flow and pulse wave velocity (PWV) quantification using manual, semi-automatic and fully automatic analysis techniques. METHODS: 61 participants free from known cardiovascular disease were recruited. Cardiac MR was performed on a 3 T scanner. A balanced steady-state free precession stack was acquired of the ventricles with phase contrast imaging of the aorta performed pre- and post-administration of 10 ml 0.5 mmol ml(−1) gadoterate meglumine. The images were analysed manually, and using a semi-automated and a fully automated technique. RESULTS: 54 completed the study. Gadolinium-based contrast administration significantly increase the signal-to-noise ratio (pre: 830 ± 398 vs post: 1028 ± 540, p = 0.003) with no significant change in contrast-to-noise ratio (pre: 583 ± 302 vs post: 559 ± 346, p = 0.54). On LV analysis, post-contrast analysis yielded significantly higher end systolic volume (54 ± 20 vs 57 ± 18 ml, p = 0.04), and lower ejection fraction (59 ± 9 vs 57 ± 8%, p = 0.023). On RV analysis, gadolinium contrast resulted in no significant differences. Similar results were seen using the semi-automated and fully-automated techniques but with a larger magnitude of difference. Conversely, using both manual and software analysis aortic flow and PWV quantification proved robust to the effects of contrast agent producing only small non-significant differences. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium contrast administration significantly alters LV endocardial contour detection with this effect amplified when using semi-automated analysis techniques. In comparison, RV and PWV analysis is robust to these effects. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Contrast administration alters LV quantification but not flow analysis. However, these differences are small. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5965987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59659872019-04-01 Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis Fathi, Amir Weir-McCall, Jonathan R Struthers, Allan D Lipworth, Brian J Houston, Graeme Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to determine the effects of gadolinium contrast agent on right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) volumetric, aortic flow and pulse wave velocity (PWV) quantification using manual, semi-automatic and fully automatic analysis techniques. METHODS: 61 participants free from known cardiovascular disease were recruited. Cardiac MR was performed on a 3 T scanner. A balanced steady-state free precession stack was acquired of the ventricles with phase contrast imaging of the aorta performed pre- and post-administration of 10 ml 0.5 mmol ml(−1) gadoterate meglumine. The images were analysed manually, and using a semi-automated and a fully automated technique. RESULTS: 54 completed the study. Gadolinium-based contrast administration significantly increase the signal-to-noise ratio (pre: 830 ± 398 vs post: 1028 ± 540, p = 0.003) with no significant change in contrast-to-noise ratio (pre: 583 ± 302 vs post: 559 ± 346, p = 0.54). On LV analysis, post-contrast analysis yielded significantly higher end systolic volume (54 ± 20 vs 57 ± 18 ml, p = 0.04), and lower ejection fraction (59 ± 9 vs 57 ± 8%, p = 0.023). On RV analysis, gadolinium contrast resulted in no significant differences. Similar results were seen using the semi-automated and fully-automated techniques but with a larger magnitude of difference. Conversely, using both manual and software analysis aortic flow and PWV quantification proved robust to the effects of contrast agent producing only small non-significant differences. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium contrast administration significantly alters LV endocardial contour detection with this effect amplified when using semi-automated analysis techniques. In comparison, RV and PWV analysis is robust to these effects. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Contrast administration alters LV quantification but not flow analysis. However, these differences are small. The British Institute of Radiology. 2018-04 2018-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5965987/ /pubmed/29271236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170717 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Full Paper Fathi, Amir Weir-McCall, Jonathan R Struthers, Allan D Lipworth, Brian J Houston, Graeme Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis |
title | Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis |
title_full | Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis |
title_fullStr | Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis |
title_short | Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis |
title_sort | effects of contrast administration on cardiac mri volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis |
topic | Full Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29271236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170717 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fathiamir effectsofcontrastadministrationoncardiacmrivolumetricflowandpulsewavevelocityquantificationusingmanualandsoftwarebasedanalysis AT weirmccalljonathanr effectsofcontrastadministrationoncardiacmrivolumetricflowandpulsewavevelocityquantificationusingmanualandsoftwarebasedanalysis AT struthersalland effectsofcontrastadministrationoncardiacmrivolumetricflowandpulsewavevelocityquantificationusingmanualandsoftwarebasedanalysis AT lipworthbrianj effectsofcontrastadministrationoncardiacmrivolumetricflowandpulsewavevelocityquantificationusingmanualandsoftwarebasedanalysis AT houstongraeme effectsofcontrastadministrationoncardiacmrivolumetricflowandpulsewavevelocityquantificationusingmanualandsoftwarebasedanalysis |