Cargando…

Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to determine the effects of gadolinium contrast agent on right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) volumetric, aortic flow and pulse wave velocity (PWV) quantification using manual, semi-automatic and fully automatic analysis techniques. METHODS: 61 participant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fathi, Amir, Weir-McCall, Jonathan R, Struthers, Allan D, Lipworth, Brian J, Houston, Graeme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29271236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170717
_version_ 1783325402662436864
author Fathi, Amir
Weir-McCall, Jonathan R
Struthers, Allan D
Lipworth, Brian J
Houston, Graeme
author_facet Fathi, Amir
Weir-McCall, Jonathan R
Struthers, Allan D
Lipworth, Brian J
Houston, Graeme
author_sort Fathi, Amir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to determine the effects of gadolinium contrast agent on right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) volumetric, aortic flow and pulse wave velocity (PWV) quantification using manual, semi-automatic and fully automatic analysis techniques. METHODS: 61 participants free from known cardiovascular disease were recruited. Cardiac MR was performed on a 3 T scanner. A balanced steady-state free precession stack was acquired of the ventricles with phase contrast imaging of the aorta performed pre- and post-administration of 10 ml 0.5 mmol ml(−1) gadoterate meglumine. The images were analysed manually, and using a semi-automated and a fully automated technique. RESULTS: 54 completed the study. Gadolinium-based contrast administration significantly increase the signal-to-noise ratio (pre: 830 ± 398 vs post: 1028 ± 540, p = 0.003) with no significant change in contrast-to-noise ratio (pre: 583 ± 302 vs post: 559 ± 346, p = 0.54). On LV analysis, post-contrast analysis yielded significantly higher end systolic volume (54 ± 20 vs 57 ± 18 ml, p = 0.04), and lower ejection fraction (59 ± 9 vs 57 ± 8%, p = 0.023). On RV analysis, gadolinium contrast resulted in no significant differences. Similar results were seen using the semi-automated and fully-automated techniques but with a larger magnitude of difference. Conversely, using both manual and software analysis aortic flow and PWV quantification proved robust to the effects of contrast agent producing only small non-significant differences. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium contrast administration significantly alters LV endocardial contour detection with this effect amplified when using semi-automated analysis techniques. In comparison, RV and PWV analysis is robust to these effects. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Contrast administration alters LV quantification but not flow analysis. However, these differences are small.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5965987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59659872019-04-01 Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis Fathi, Amir Weir-McCall, Jonathan R Struthers, Allan D Lipworth, Brian J Houston, Graeme Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to determine the effects of gadolinium contrast agent on right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) volumetric, aortic flow and pulse wave velocity (PWV) quantification using manual, semi-automatic and fully automatic analysis techniques. METHODS: 61 participants free from known cardiovascular disease were recruited. Cardiac MR was performed on a 3 T scanner. A balanced steady-state free precession stack was acquired of the ventricles with phase contrast imaging of the aorta performed pre- and post-administration of 10 ml 0.5 mmol ml(−1) gadoterate meglumine. The images were analysed manually, and using a semi-automated and a fully automated technique. RESULTS: 54 completed the study. Gadolinium-based contrast administration significantly increase the signal-to-noise ratio (pre: 830 ± 398 vs post: 1028 ± 540, p = 0.003) with no significant change in contrast-to-noise ratio (pre: 583 ± 302 vs post: 559 ± 346, p = 0.54). On LV analysis, post-contrast analysis yielded significantly higher end systolic volume (54 ± 20 vs 57 ± 18 ml, p = 0.04), and lower ejection fraction (59 ± 9 vs 57 ± 8%, p = 0.023). On RV analysis, gadolinium contrast resulted in no significant differences. Similar results were seen using the semi-automated and fully-automated techniques but with a larger magnitude of difference. Conversely, using both manual and software analysis aortic flow and PWV quantification proved robust to the effects of contrast agent producing only small non-significant differences. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium contrast administration significantly alters LV endocardial contour detection with this effect amplified when using semi-automated analysis techniques. In comparison, RV and PWV analysis is robust to these effects. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Contrast administration alters LV quantification but not flow analysis. However, these differences are small. The British Institute of Radiology. 2018-04 2018-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5965987/ /pubmed/29271236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170717 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Fathi, Amir
Weir-McCall, Jonathan R
Struthers, Allan D
Lipworth, Brian J
Houston, Graeme
Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis
title Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis
title_full Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis
title_fullStr Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis
title_short Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis
title_sort effects of contrast administration on cardiac mri volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5965987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29271236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170717
work_keys_str_mv AT fathiamir effectsofcontrastadministrationoncardiacmrivolumetricflowandpulsewavevelocityquantificationusingmanualandsoftwarebasedanalysis
AT weirmccalljonathanr effectsofcontrastadministrationoncardiacmrivolumetricflowandpulsewavevelocityquantificationusingmanualandsoftwarebasedanalysis
AT struthersalland effectsofcontrastadministrationoncardiacmrivolumetricflowandpulsewavevelocityquantificationusingmanualandsoftwarebasedanalysis
AT lipworthbrianj effectsofcontrastadministrationoncardiacmrivolumetricflowandpulsewavevelocityquantificationusingmanualandsoftwarebasedanalysis
AT houstongraeme effectsofcontrastadministrationoncardiacmrivolumetricflowandpulsewavevelocityquantificationusingmanualandsoftwarebasedanalysis