Steering Charge Kinetics of Tin Niobate Photocatalysts: Key Roles of Phase Structure and Electronic Structure

Tin niobate photocatalysts with the phase structures of froodite (SnNb(2)O(6)) and pyrochlore (Sn(2)Nb(2)O(7)) were obtained by a facile solvothermal method in order to explore the impact of phase structure and electronic structure on the charge kinetics and photocatalytic performance. By employing tin niobate as a model compound, the effects of phase structure over electronic structure, photocatalytic activity toward methyl orange solution and hydrogen evolution were systematically investigated. It is found that the variation of phase structure from SnNb(2)O(6) to Sn(2)Nb(2)O(7) accompanied with modulation of particle size and band edge potentials that has great consequences on photocatalytic performance. In combination with the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), transient photocurrent responses, transient absorption spectroscopy (TAS), and the analysis of the charge-carrier dynamics suggested that variation of electronic structure has great impacts on the charge separation and transfer rate of tin niobate photocatalysts and the subsequent photocatalytic performance. Moreover, the results of the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) indicated that the existent of Sn(4+) species in Sn(2)Nb(2)O(7) could result in a decrease in photocatalytic activity. Photocatalytic test demonstrated that the SnNb(2)O(6) (froodite) catalyst possesses a higher photocatalytic activity toward MO degradation and H(2) evolution compared with the sample of Sn(2)Nb(2)O(7) (pyrochlore). On the basis of spin resonance measurement and trapping experiment, it is expected that photogenerated holes, O(2)(−•), and OH(•) active species dominate the photodegradation of methyl orange. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s11671-018-2578-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.