Cargando…

Consistent tracer administration profile improves test–retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with (82)Rb dynamic PET imaging

OBJECTIVES: Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and stress/rest flow reserve is used increasingly to diagnose multi-vessel coronary artery disease and micro-vascular disease with PET imaging. However, variability in the measurements may limit physician confidence to direct revascularizatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klein, Ran, Ocneanu, Adrian, Renaud, Jennifer M., Ziadi, Maria C., Beanlands, Rob S. B., deKemp, Robert A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5966478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27804067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-016-0698-6
_version_ 1783325467037663232
author Klein, Ran
Ocneanu, Adrian
Renaud, Jennifer M.
Ziadi, Maria C.
Beanlands, Rob S. B.
deKemp, Robert A.
author_facet Klein, Ran
Ocneanu, Adrian
Renaud, Jennifer M.
Ziadi, Maria C.
Beanlands, Rob S. B.
deKemp, Robert A.
author_sort Klein, Ran
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and stress/rest flow reserve is used increasingly to diagnose multi-vessel coronary artery disease and micro-vascular disease with PET imaging. However, variability in the measurements may limit physician confidence to direct revascularization therapies based on specific threshold values. This study evaluated the effects of rubidium-82 ((82)Rb) tracer injection profile using a constant-activity-rate (CA) vs a constant-flow-rate (CF) infusion to improve test–retest repeatability of MBF measurements. METHOD: 22 participants underwent single-session (82)Rb dynamic PET imaging during rest and dipyridamole stress using one of 2 test–retest infusion protocols: CA–CA (n = 12) or CA–CF (n = 10). MBF was quantified using a single-tissue-compartment model (1TCM) and a simplified retention model (SRM). Non-parametric test–retest repeatability coefficients (RPC(np)) were compared between groups. Myocardium-to-blood contrast and signal-to-noise ratios of the late uptake images (2 to 6 minutes) were also compared to evaluate standard myocardial perfusion image (MPI) quality. RESULTS: MBF values in the CA–CA group were more repeatable (smaller RPC(np)) than the CA–CF group using the 1TCM at rest alone, rest and stress combined, and stress/rest reserve (21% vs 36%, 16% vs 19%, and 20% vs 27%, P < 0.05, respectively), and using the SRM at Rest and Stress alone, Rest and Stress combined, and stress/rest reserve (21% vs 38%, 15% vs 25%, 22% vs 38%, and 23% vs 49%, P < 0.05, respectively). In terms of image quality, myocardium-to-blood contrast and signal-to-noise ratios were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Constant-activity-rate ‘square-wave’ infusion of (82)Rb produces more repeatable tracer injection profiles and decreases the test–retest variability of MBF measurements, when compared to a constant-flow-rate ‘bolus’ administration of (82)Rb, especially with SRM, and without compromising standard MPI quality. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12350-016-0698-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5966478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59664782018-06-04 Consistent tracer administration profile improves test–retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with (82)Rb dynamic PET imaging Klein, Ran Ocneanu, Adrian Renaud, Jennifer M. Ziadi, Maria C. Beanlands, Rob S. B. deKemp, Robert A. J Nucl Cardiol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and stress/rest flow reserve is used increasingly to diagnose multi-vessel coronary artery disease and micro-vascular disease with PET imaging. However, variability in the measurements may limit physician confidence to direct revascularization therapies based on specific threshold values. This study evaluated the effects of rubidium-82 ((82)Rb) tracer injection profile using a constant-activity-rate (CA) vs a constant-flow-rate (CF) infusion to improve test–retest repeatability of MBF measurements. METHOD: 22 participants underwent single-session (82)Rb dynamic PET imaging during rest and dipyridamole stress using one of 2 test–retest infusion protocols: CA–CA (n = 12) or CA–CF (n = 10). MBF was quantified using a single-tissue-compartment model (1TCM) and a simplified retention model (SRM). Non-parametric test–retest repeatability coefficients (RPC(np)) were compared between groups. Myocardium-to-blood contrast and signal-to-noise ratios of the late uptake images (2 to 6 minutes) were also compared to evaluate standard myocardial perfusion image (MPI) quality. RESULTS: MBF values in the CA–CA group were more repeatable (smaller RPC(np)) than the CA–CF group using the 1TCM at rest alone, rest and stress combined, and stress/rest reserve (21% vs 36%, 16% vs 19%, and 20% vs 27%, P < 0.05, respectively), and using the SRM at Rest and Stress alone, Rest and Stress combined, and stress/rest reserve (21% vs 38%, 15% vs 25%, 22% vs 38%, and 23% vs 49%, P < 0.05, respectively). In terms of image quality, myocardium-to-blood contrast and signal-to-noise ratios were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Constant-activity-rate ‘square-wave’ infusion of (82)Rb produces more repeatable tracer injection profiles and decreases the test–retest variability of MBF measurements, when compared to a constant-flow-rate ‘bolus’ administration of (82)Rb, especially with SRM, and without compromising standard MPI quality. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12350-016-0698-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2016-11-01 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5966478/ /pubmed/27804067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-016-0698-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Klein, Ran
Ocneanu, Adrian
Renaud, Jennifer M.
Ziadi, Maria C.
Beanlands, Rob S. B.
deKemp, Robert A.
Consistent tracer administration profile improves test–retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with (82)Rb dynamic PET imaging
title Consistent tracer administration profile improves test–retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with (82)Rb dynamic PET imaging
title_full Consistent tracer administration profile improves test–retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with (82)Rb dynamic PET imaging
title_fullStr Consistent tracer administration profile improves test–retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with (82)Rb dynamic PET imaging
title_full_unstemmed Consistent tracer administration profile improves test–retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with (82)Rb dynamic PET imaging
title_short Consistent tracer administration profile improves test–retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with (82)Rb dynamic PET imaging
title_sort consistent tracer administration profile improves test–retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with (82)rb dynamic pet imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5966478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27804067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-016-0698-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kleinran consistenttraceradministrationprofileimprovestestretestrepeatabilityofmyocardialbloodflowquantificationwith82rbdynamicpetimaging
AT ocneanuadrian consistenttraceradministrationprofileimprovestestretestrepeatabilityofmyocardialbloodflowquantificationwith82rbdynamicpetimaging
AT renaudjenniferm consistenttraceradministrationprofileimprovestestretestrepeatabilityofmyocardialbloodflowquantificationwith82rbdynamicpetimaging
AT ziadimariac consistenttraceradministrationprofileimprovestestretestrepeatabilityofmyocardialbloodflowquantificationwith82rbdynamicpetimaging
AT beanlandsrobsb consistenttraceradministrationprofileimprovestestretestrepeatabilityofmyocardialbloodflowquantificationwith82rbdynamicpetimaging
AT dekemproberta consistenttraceradministrationprofileimprovestestretestrepeatabilityofmyocardialbloodflowquantificationwith82rbdynamicpetimaging