Cargando…

Biomechanical, Biochemical, and Cell Biological Evaluation of Different Collagen Scaffolds for Tendon Augmentation

Tendon augmentation is increasingly clinically relevant due to rising amount of tendon ruptures because of the aging and more demanding population. Therefore, newly developed scaffolds based on bovine epoxide stabilized collagen maintaining the native fibril-like collagen structure were characterize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gabler, Carolin, Spohn, Juliane, Tischer, Thomas, Bader, Rainer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5966701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7246716
_version_ 1783325509144281088
author Gabler, Carolin
Spohn, Juliane
Tischer, Thomas
Bader, Rainer
author_facet Gabler, Carolin
Spohn, Juliane
Tischer, Thomas
Bader, Rainer
author_sort Gabler, Carolin
collection PubMed
description Tendon augmentation is increasingly clinically relevant due to rising amount of tendon ruptures because of the aging and more demanding population. Therefore, newly developed scaffolds based on bovine epoxide stabilized collagen maintaining the native fibril-like collagen structure were characterized and compared to two commercially available porcine collagen scaffolds. For biomechanical testing (ultimate load, ultimate stress, stiffness, and elastic modulus), bovine collagen scaffolds were hydrated and compared to reference products. Cell viability and proliferation were assessed by seeding human primary fibroblasts on each collagen-based scaffold and cultured over various time periods (3 d, 7 d, and 14 d). Live/dead staining was performed and metabolic cell activity (WST-1 assay) was measured. Biochemical degradability was investigated by enzymatic digestion. The bovine collagen scaffold showed significantly enhanced biomechanical properties. These persisted over different rehydration times. Cell biological tests revealed that the bovine collagen scaffolds support reproducible cell colonization and a significant increase in the number of viable cells during cultivation. The results are comparable with the viability and proliferation rate of cells grown on porcine reference materials. With regard to biochemical degradability, all tested materials showed comparable resistance to enzymatic degradation in vitro. Due to imitating the natural tendon structure the new scaffold material is supposed to provide beneficial effects in future clinical application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5966701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59667012018-05-31 Biomechanical, Biochemical, and Cell Biological Evaluation of Different Collagen Scaffolds for Tendon Augmentation Gabler, Carolin Spohn, Juliane Tischer, Thomas Bader, Rainer Biomed Res Int Research Article Tendon augmentation is increasingly clinically relevant due to rising amount of tendon ruptures because of the aging and more demanding population. Therefore, newly developed scaffolds based on bovine epoxide stabilized collagen maintaining the native fibril-like collagen structure were characterized and compared to two commercially available porcine collagen scaffolds. For biomechanical testing (ultimate load, ultimate stress, stiffness, and elastic modulus), bovine collagen scaffolds were hydrated and compared to reference products. Cell viability and proliferation were assessed by seeding human primary fibroblasts on each collagen-based scaffold and cultured over various time periods (3 d, 7 d, and 14 d). Live/dead staining was performed and metabolic cell activity (WST-1 assay) was measured. Biochemical degradability was investigated by enzymatic digestion. The bovine collagen scaffold showed significantly enhanced biomechanical properties. These persisted over different rehydration times. Cell biological tests revealed that the bovine collagen scaffolds support reproducible cell colonization and a significant increase in the number of viable cells during cultivation. The results are comparable with the viability and proliferation rate of cells grown on porcine reference materials. With regard to biochemical degradability, all tested materials showed comparable resistance to enzymatic degradation in vitro. Due to imitating the natural tendon structure the new scaffold material is supposed to provide beneficial effects in future clinical application. Hindawi 2018-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5966701/ /pubmed/29854782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7246716 Text en Copyright © 2018 Carolin Gabler et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gabler, Carolin
Spohn, Juliane
Tischer, Thomas
Bader, Rainer
Biomechanical, Biochemical, and Cell Biological Evaluation of Different Collagen Scaffolds for Tendon Augmentation
title Biomechanical, Biochemical, and Cell Biological Evaluation of Different Collagen Scaffolds for Tendon Augmentation
title_full Biomechanical, Biochemical, and Cell Biological Evaluation of Different Collagen Scaffolds for Tendon Augmentation
title_fullStr Biomechanical, Biochemical, and Cell Biological Evaluation of Different Collagen Scaffolds for Tendon Augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical, Biochemical, and Cell Biological Evaluation of Different Collagen Scaffolds for Tendon Augmentation
title_short Biomechanical, Biochemical, and Cell Biological Evaluation of Different Collagen Scaffolds for Tendon Augmentation
title_sort biomechanical, biochemical, and cell biological evaluation of different collagen scaffolds for tendon augmentation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5966701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7246716
work_keys_str_mv AT gablercarolin biomechanicalbiochemicalandcellbiologicalevaluationofdifferentcollagenscaffoldsfortendonaugmentation
AT spohnjuliane biomechanicalbiochemicalandcellbiologicalevaluationofdifferentcollagenscaffoldsfortendonaugmentation
AT tischerthomas biomechanicalbiochemicalandcellbiologicalevaluationofdifferentcollagenscaffoldsfortendonaugmentation
AT baderrainer biomechanicalbiochemicalandcellbiologicalevaluationofdifferentcollagenscaffoldsfortendonaugmentation