Cargando…
Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a new non-invasive approach to locate the testicular area in which spermatogenesis is most likely to be found in non-obstructive azoospermic testes and to evaluate the accuracy of CEUS as a predictor o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5966902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29792185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0367-y |
_version_ | 1783325532091318272 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Shijun Du, Jing Tian, Ruhui Xie, Shaowei Li, Fenghua Li, Zheng |
author_facet | Zhang, Shijun Du, Jing Tian, Ruhui Xie, Shaowei Li, Fenghua Li, Zheng |
author_sort | Zhang, Shijun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a new non-invasive approach to locate the testicular area in which spermatogenesis is most likely to be found in non-obstructive azoospermic testes and to evaluate the accuracy of CEUS as a predictor of successful sperm retrieval. METHODS: CEUS was performed in 120 nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (M-TESE) was performed on the best and poorest perfusion areas selected by CEUS and on conventional areas. RESULTS: In the 187 testicles that underwent M-TESE, the sperm retrieval rates (SRRs) in the best perfusion area and poorest perfusion area over the maximal longitudinal section and conventional area were 63.1, 34.7 and 47.1%. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the arrival times (AT) ≤27 s, time-to-peak intensity (TTP) ≤45 s, and peak intensity (PI) ≥11 dB were the best predictors of positive sperm retrieval. The location of the best perfusion area was able to guide M-TESE to improve the success rates. CONCLUSIONS: Testicle CEUS is suggested to be performed in all patients with NOA. If AT≤27 s, TTP ≤ 45 s or PI≥11 dB are found in the best perfusion area, M-TESE is strongly recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5966902 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59669022018-05-24 Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia Zhang, Shijun Du, Jing Tian, Ruhui Xie, Shaowei Li, Fenghua Li, Zheng BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a new non-invasive approach to locate the testicular area in which spermatogenesis is most likely to be found in non-obstructive azoospermic testes and to evaluate the accuracy of CEUS as a predictor of successful sperm retrieval. METHODS: CEUS was performed in 120 nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (M-TESE) was performed on the best and poorest perfusion areas selected by CEUS and on conventional areas. RESULTS: In the 187 testicles that underwent M-TESE, the sperm retrieval rates (SRRs) in the best perfusion area and poorest perfusion area over the maximal longitudinal section and conventional area were 63.1, 34.7 and 47.1%. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the arrival times (AT) ≤27 s, time-to-peak intensity (TTP) ≤45 s, and peak intensity (PI) ≥11 dB were the best predictors of positive sperm retrieval. The location of the best perfusion area was able to guide M-TESE to improve the success rates. CONCLUSIONS: Testicle CEUS is suggested to be performed in all patients with NOA. If AT≤27 s, TTP ≤ 45 s or PI≥11 dB are found in the best perfusion area, M-TESE is strongly recommended. BioMed Central 2018-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5966902/ /pubmed/29792185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0367-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Shijun Du, Jing Tian, Ruhui Xie, Shaowei Li, Fenghua Li, Zheng Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia |
title | Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia |
title_full | Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia |
title_short | Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia |
title_sort | assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5966902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29792185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0367-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangshijun assessmentoftheuseofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinguidingmicrodissectiontesticularspermextractioninnonobstructiveazoospermia AT dujing assessmentoftheuseofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinguidingmicrodissectiontesticularspermextractioninnonobstructiveazoospermia AT tianruhui assessmentoftheuseofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinguidingmicrodissectiontesticularspermextractioninnonobstructiveazoospermia AT xieshaowei assessmentoftheuseofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinguidingmicrodissectiontesticularspermextractioninnonobstructiveazoospermia AT lifenghua assessmentoftheuseofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinguidingmicrodissectiontesticularspermextractioninnonobstructiveazoospermia AT lizheng assessmentoftheuseofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinguidingmicrodissectiontesticularspermextractioninnonobstructiveazoospermia |