Cargando…

The contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species

After a decade of research and metagenomic analyses, our knowledge of the human microbiota appears to have reached a plateau despite promising results. In many studies, culture has proven to be essential in describing new prokaryotic species and filling metagenomic gaps. In 2015, only 2172 different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bilen, Melhem, Dufour, Jean-Charles, Lagier, Jean-Christophe, Cadoret, Fréderic, Daoud, Ziad, Dubourg, Grégory, Raoult, Didier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5966928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29793532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0485-5
_version_ 1783325537923497984
author Bilen, Melhem
Dufour, Jean-Charles
Lagier, Jean-Christophe
Cadoret, Fréderic
Daoud, Ziad
Dubourg, Grégory
Raoult, Didier
author_facet Bilen, Melhem
Dufour, Jean-Charles
Lagier, Jean-Christophe
Cadoret, Fréderic
Daoud, Ziad
Dubourg, Grégory
Raoult, Didier
author_sort Bilen, Melhem
collection PubMed
description After a decade of research and metagenomic analyses, our knowledge of the human microbiota appears to have reached a plateau despite promising results. In many studies, culture has proven to be essential in describing new prokaryotic species and filling metagenomic gaps. In 2015, only 2172 different prokaryotic species were reported to have been isolated at least once from the human body as pathogens or commensals. In this review, we update the previous repertoire by reporting the different species isolated from the human body to date, increasing it by 28% to reach a total of 2776 species associated with human beings. They have been classified into 11 different phyla, mostly the Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria. Finally, culturomics contributed up to 66.2% towards updating this repertoire by reporting 400 species, of which 288 were novel. This demonstrates the need to continue the culturing work, which seems essential in order to decipher the hidden human microbial content. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-018-0485-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5966928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59669282018-05-24 The contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species Bilen, Melhem Dufour, Jean-Charles Lagier, Jean-Christophe Cadoret, Fréderic Daoud, Ziad Dubourg, Grégory Raoult, Didier Microbiome Review After a decade of research and metagenomic analyses, our knowledge of the human microbiota appears to have reached a plateau despite promising results. In many studies, culture has proven to be essential in describing new prokaryotic species and filling metagenomic gaps. In 2015, only 2172 different prokaryotic species were reported to have been isolated at least once from the human body as pathogens or commensals. In this review, we update the previous repertoire by reporting the different species isolated from the human body to date, increasing it by 28% to reach a total of 2776 species associated with human beings. They have been classified into 11 different phyla, mostly the Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria. Finally, culturomics contributed up to 66.2% towards updating this repertoire by reporting 400 species, of which 288 were novel. This demonstrates the need to continue the culturing work, which seems essential in order to decipher the hidden human microbial content. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-018-0485-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5966928/ /pubmed/29793532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0485-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Bilen, Melhem
Dufour, Jean-Charles
Lagier, Jean-Christophe
Cadoret, Fréderic
Daoud, Ziad
Dubourg, Grégory
Raoult, Didier
The contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species
title The contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species
title_full The contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species
title_fullStr The contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species
title_full_unstemmed The contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species
title_short The contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species
title_sort contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5966928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29793532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0485-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bilenmelhem thecontributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT dufourjeancharles thecontributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT lagierjeanchristophe thecontributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT cadoretfrederic thecontributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT daoudziad thecontributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT dubourggregory thecontributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT raoultdidier thecontributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT bilenmelhem contributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT dufourjeancharles contributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT lagierjeanchristophe contributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT cadoretfrederic contributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT daoudziad contributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT dubourggregory contributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies
AT raoultdidier contributionofculturomicstotherepertoireofisolatedhumanbacterialandarchaealspecies