Cargando…

Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?

BACKGROUND: The impact of surgeon handedness on acetabular cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well studied. The aim of our study is to investigate the difference of cup orientation in bilateral THA performed by right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach and which cup cou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Xinggui, Ni, Ming, Li, Heng, Li, Xin, Li, Xiang, Fu, Jun, Chen, Jiying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5967059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29792206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0789-y
_version_ 1783325557855879168
author Song, Xinggui
Ni, Ming
Li, Heng
Li, Xin
Li, Xiang
Fu, Jun
Chen, Jiying
author_facet Song, Xinggui
Ni, Ming
Li, Heng
Li, Xin
Li, Xiang
Fu, Jun
Chen, Jiying
author_sort Song, Xinggui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of surgeon handedness on acetabular cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well studied. The aim of our study is to investigate the difference of cup orientation in bilateral THA performed by right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach and which cup could be fitter to Lewinneck’s safe zone. METHODS: The study consisted of 498 patients that underwent bilateral THA by three right-handed surgeons in our hospital. Postoperative acetabular cup anteversion and abduction on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph were measured by Orthoview software (Orthoview LLC, Jacksonville, Florida). Furthermore, the percentage of cup placement within the safe zone was compared. RESULTS: The mean anteversion was 25.28 (25.28° ± 7.16°) in left THA and 22.01 (22.01° ± 6.35°) in right THA (p < 0.001). The mean abduction was 37.50 (37.50° ± 6.76°) in left THA and 38.59 (38.59° ± 6.84°) in right THA (p = 0.011). In the left side, the cup was positioned in Lewinnek’s safe zone in 52% for anteversion, 87% for abduction, and 46% for both anteversion and abduction. But the cup placement within Lewinnek’s safe zone was 71, 88, and 62% in the right side, respectively. There were significant differences in the percentage of acetabular cup placement within the safe zone for anteversion (p < 0.001) and for both anteversion and inclination (p < 0.001). Dislocation occurred in 7.0% (35/498) of cases in left THA and 3.2% (16/498) in right THA. The percentages of patients experiencing dislocation were significantly different between the two sides (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This current study demonstrated that surgeon handedness is likely to be a contributing factor that affects cup inclination and anteversion in bilateral THA and that the placement of cup performed by dominant hands of surgeons is more accurate than that performed by non-dominant sides.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5967059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59670592018-05-24 Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach? Song, Xinggui Ni, Ming Li, Heng Li, Xin Li, Xiang Fu, Jun Chen, Jiying J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The impact of surgeon handedness on acetabular cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well studied. The aim of our study is to investigate the difference of cup orientation in bilateral THA performed by right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach and which cup could be fitter to Lewinneck’s safe zone. METHODS: The study consisted of 498 patients that underwent bilateral THA by three right-handed surgeons in our hospital. Postoperative acetabular cup anteversion and abduction on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph were measured by Orthoview software (Orthoview LLC, Jacksonville, Florida). Furthermore, the percentage of cup placement within the safe zone was compared. RESULTS: The mean anteversion was 25.28 (25.28° ± 7.16°) in left THA and 22.01 (22.01° ± 6.35°) in right THA (p < 0.001). The mean abduction was 37.50 (37.50° ± 6.76°) in left THA and 38.59 (38.59° ± 6.84°) in right THA (p = 0.011). In the left side, the cup was positioned in Lewinnek’s safe zone in 52% for anteversion, 87% for abduction, and 46% for both anteversion and abduction. But the cup placement within Lewinnek’s safe zone was 71, 88, and 62% in the right side, respectively. There were significant differences in the percentage of acetabular cup placement within the safe zone for anteversion (p < 0.001) and for both anteversion and inclination (p < 0.001). Dislocation occurred in 7.0% (35/498) of cases in left THA and 3.2% (16/498) in right THA. The percentages of patients experiencing dislocation were significantly different between the two sides (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This current study demonstrated that surgeon handedness is likely to be a contributing factor that affects cup inclination and anteversion in bilateral THA and that the placement of cup performed by dominant hands of surgeons is more accurate than that performed by non-dominant sides. BioMed Central 2018-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5967059/ /pubmed/29792206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0789-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Song, Xinggui
Ni, Ming
Li, Heng
Li, Xin
Li, Xiang
Fu, Jun
Chen, Jiying
Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?
title Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?
title_full Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?
title_fullStr Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?
title_full_unstemmed Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?
title_short Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?
title_sort is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5967059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29792206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0789-y
work_keys_str_mv AT songxinggui isthecuporientationdifferentinbilateraltotalhiparthroplastywithrighthandedsurgeonsusingposterolateralapproach
AT niming isthecuporientationdifferentinbilateraltotalhiparthroplastywithrighthandedsurgeonsusingposterolateralapproach
AT liheng isthecuporientationdifferentinbilateraltotalhiparthroplastywithrighthandedsurgeonsusingposterolateralapproach
AT lixin isthecuporientationdifferentinbilateraltotalhiparthroplastywithrighthandedsurgeonsusingposterolateralapproach
AT lixiang isthecuporientationdifferentinbilateraltotalhiparthroplastywithrighthandedsurgeonsusingposterolateralapproach
AT fujun isthecuporientationdifferentinbilateraltotalhiparthroplastywithrighthandedsurgeonsusingposterolateralapproach
AT chenjiying isthecuporientationdifferentinbilateraltotalhiparthroplastywithrighthandedsurgeonsusingposterolateralapproach