Cargando…
Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: There is an association between throwing activity and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD). An 18° to 20° deficit has been adopted as the standard definition of pathological GIRD, but specific findings as to how GIRD relates to an injury are inconsistent. PURPOSE: To systematica...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5967160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29845083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118773322 |
_version_ | 1783325576754364416 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Jordan E. Fullmer, Joshua A. Nielsen, Chaseton M. Johnson, Joshua K. Moorman, Claude T. |
author_facet | Johnson, Jordan E. Fullmer, Joshua A. Nielsen, Chaseton M. Johnson, Joshua K. Moorman, Claude T. |
author_sort | Johnson, Jordan E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is an association between throwing activity and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD). An 18° to 20° deficit has been adopted as the standard definition of pathological GIRD, but specific findings as to how GIRD relates to an injury are inconsistent. PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature to clarify the definition of GIRD diagnosis for adolescent and adult overhead athletes and to examine the association between GIRD and an increased risk of injuries in these athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed. Observational studies comparing glenohumeral internal rotation range of motion (ROM) in injured and uninjured overhead athletes were included for the meta-analysis. Studies of adolescent and adult athletes were analyzed separately. ROM was compared for the injured and uninjured groups, and a weighted mean GIRD was estimated. To account for potential heterogeneity across studies, both fixed- and random-effects models were used to calculate a standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: Nine studies of level 3 or 4 evidence were included. From these, 12 study groups (4 adolescent, 8 adult) comprising 819 overhead athletes (226 injured, 593 uninjured) were included in the meta-analysis. The estimated SMD in GIRD between the injured and uninjured groups was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.15-0.77; P < .01) for the overall sample. The between-group effect was larger for adults (SMD, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.18 to 1.02]; P < .01) than adolescents (SMD, 0.20 [95% CI, –0.24 to 0.63]; P = .13). The weighted mean GIRD for the injured and uninjured groups was 13.8° ± 5.6° and 9.6° ± 3.0°, respectively, which also differed by age group. Moderate study heterogeneity was observed (I (2) = 69.0%). CONCLUSION: Based on this systematic review, the current definition of pathological GIRD may be too conservative, and a distinct definition may be required for adolescent and adult athletes. While the results indicate a link between internal rotation deficits and upper extremity injuries in the overhead athlete, higher quality prospective research is needed to clarify the role that GIRD plays in future injuries to overhead athletes of various ages. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5967160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59671602018-05-29 Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Johnson, Jordan E. Fullmer, Joshua A. Nielsen, Chaseton M. Johnson, Joshua K. Moorman, Claude T. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: There is an association between throwing activity and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD). An 18° to 20° deficit has been adopted as the standard definition of pathological GIRD, but specific findings as to how GIRD relates to an injury are inconsistent. PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature to clarify the definition of GIRD diagnosis for adolescent and adult overhead athletes and to examine the association between GIRD and an increased risk of injuries in these athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed. Observational studies comparing glenohumeral internal rotation range of motion (ROM) in injured and uninjured overhead athletes were included for the meta-analysis. Studies of adolescent and adult athletes were analyzed separately. ROM was compared for the injured and uninjured groups, and a weighted mean GIRD was estimated. To account for potential heterogeneity across studies, both fixed- and random-effects models were used to calculate a standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: Nine studies of level 3 or 4 evidence were included. From these, 12 study groups (4 adolescent, 8 adult) comprising 819 overhead athletes (226 injured, 593 uninjured) were included in the meta-analysis. The estimated SMD in GIRD between the injured and uninjured groups was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.15-0.77; P < .01) for the overall sample. The between-group effect was larger for adults (SMD, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.18 to 1.02]; P < .01) than adolescents (SMD, 0.20 [95% CI, –0.24 to 0.63]; P = .13). The weighted mean GIRD for the injured and uninjured groups was 13.8° ± 5.6° and 9.6° ± 3.0°, respectively, which also differed by age group. Moderate study heterogeneity was observed (I (2) = 69.0%). CONCLUSION: Based on this systematic review, the current definition of pathological GIRD may be too conservative, and a distinct definition may be required for adolescent and adult athletes. While the results indicate a link between internal rotation deficits and upper extremity injuries in the overhead athlete, higher quality prospective research is needed to clarify the role that GIRD plays in future injuries to overhead athletes of various ages. SAGE Publications 2018-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5967160/ /pubmed/29845083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118773322 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Johnson, Jordan E. Fullmer, Joshua A. Nielsen, Chaseton M. Johnson, Joshua K. Moorman, Claude T. Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5967160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29845083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118773322 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonjordane glenohumeralinternalrotationdeficitandinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fullmerjoshuaa glenohumeralinternalrotationdeficitandinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nielsenchasetonm glenohumeralinternalrotationdeficitandinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT johnsonjoshuak glenohumeralinternalrotationdeficitandinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT moormanclaudet glenohumeralinternalrotationdeficitandinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |