Cargando…

The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of cannula diameter and conjunctival flap method on bleb survival in rabbits undergoing cannula-based glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS). METHODS: Twelve New Zealand White rabbits underwent GFS in both eyes. The twenty-four eyes were divided into four groups. Two of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodgers, Cooper D., Meyer, Alissa M., Rosenberg, Nicole C., Lukowski, Zachary L., Schaefer, Jamie L., Martorana, Gina M., Levine, Monica A., Meyers, Craig A., Sherwood, Mark B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5967705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29795580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196968
_version_ 1783325637281316864
author Rodgers, Cooper D.
Meyer, Alissa M.
Rosenberg, Nicole C.
Lukowski, Zachary L.
Schaefer, Jamie L.
Martorana, Gina M.
Levine, Monica A.
Meyers, Craig A.
Sherwood, Mark B.
author_facet Rodgers, Cooper D.
Meyer, Alissa M.
Rosenberg, Nicole C.
Lukowski, Zachary L.
Schaefer, Jamie L.
Martorana, Gina M.
Levine, Monica A.
Meyers, Craig A.
Sherwood, Mark B.
author_sort Rodgers, Cooper D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To examine the effect of cannula diameter and conjunctival flap method on bleb survival in rabbits undergoing cannula-based glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS). METHODS: Twelve New Zealand White rabbits underwent GFS in both eyes. The twenty-four eyes were divided into four groups. Two of the four groups (N = 12) received limbus-based conjunctival flaps (LBCF), and the other two (N = 12) received fornix-based conjunctival flaps (FBCF). Six FBCF rabbit eyes were implanted with 22-gauge drainage tubes, and the other six were implanted with 26-gauge tubes. Likewise, six LBCF rabbits received 22-gauge drainage tubes and six received 26-gauge tubes. Filtration blebs were evaluated every three days by a masked observer. Bleb failure was defined as the primary endpoint in this study and was recorded after two consecutive flat bleb evaluations. RESULTS: Group 1 (LBCF, 22- gauge cannula) had a mean bleb survival time (Mean ± SD) of 18.7 ± 2.9 days. Group 2 (LBCF, 26-gauge cannula) also had a mean bleb survival time of 18.7 ± 2.9 days. Group 3 (FBCF, 22-gauge cannula) had a mean bleb survival time of 19.2 ± 3.8 days. Group 4 (FBCF, 26-gauge cannula) had a mean bleb survival time of 19.7 ± 4.1 days. A 2-way analysis of variance showed that neither surgical approach nor cannula gauge made a statistically significant difference in bleb survival time (P = 0.634 and P = 0.874). Additionally, there was no significant interaction between cannula gauge and conjunctival flap approach (P = 0.874), suggesting that there was not a combination of drainage gauge and conjunctival flap method that produced superior bleb survival. CONCLUSION: Limbus and fornix-based conjunctival flaps are equally effective in promoting bleb survival using both 22 and 26-gauge cannulas in the rabbit model. The 26-gauge drainage tube may be preferred because its smaller size facilitates the implantation process, reducing the risk of corneal contact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5967705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59677052018-06-08 The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model Rodgers, Cooper D. Meyer, Alissa M. Rosenberg, Nicole C. Lukowski, Zachary L. Schaefer, Jamie L. Martorana, Gina M. Levine, Monica A. Meyers, Craig A. Sherwood, Mark B. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To examine the effect of cannula diameter and conjunctival flap method on bleb survival in rabbits undergoing cannula-based glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS). METHODS: Twelve New Zealand White rabbits underwent GFS in both eyes. The twenty-four eyes were divided into four groups. Two of the four groups (N = 12) received limbus-based conjunctival flaps (LBCF), and the other two (N = 12) received fornix-based conjunctival flaps (FBCF). Six FBCF rabbit eyes were implanted with 22-gauge drainage tubes, and the other six were implanted with 26-gauge tubes. Likewise, six LBCF rabbits received 22-gauge drainage tubes and six received 26-gauge tubes. Filtration blebs were evaluated every three days by a masked observer. Bleb failure was defined as the primary endpoint in this study and was recorded after two consecutive flat bleb evaluations. RESULTS: Group 1 (LBCF, 22- gauge cannula) had a mean bleb survival time (Mean ± SD) of 18.7 ± 2.9 days. Group 2 (LBCF, 26-gauge cannula) also had a mean bleb survival time of 18.7 ± 2.9 days. Group 3 (FBCF, 22-gauge cannula) had a mean bleb survival time of 19.2 ± 3.8 days. Group 4 (FBCF, 26-gauge cannula) had a mean bleb survival time of 19.7 ± 4.1 days. A 2-way analysis of variance showed that neither surgical approach nor cannula gauge made a statistically significant difference in bleb survival time (P = 0.634 and P = 0.874). Additionally, there was no significant interaction between cannula gauge and conjunctival flap approach (P = 0.874), suggesting that there was not a combination of drainage gauge and conjunctival flap method that produced superior bleb survival. CONCLUSION: Limbus and fornix-based conjunctival flaps are equally effective in promoting bleb survival using both 22 and 26-gauge cannulas in the rabbit model. The 26-gauge drainage tube may be preferred because its smaller size facilitates the implantation process, reducing the risk of corneal contact. Public Library of Science 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5967705/ /pubmed/29795580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196968 Text en © 2018 Rodgers et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rodgers, Cooper D.
Meyer, Alissa M.
Rosenberg, Nicole C.
Lukowski, Zachary L.
Schaefer, Jamie L.
Martorana, Gina M.
Levine, Monica A.
Meyers, Craig A.
Sherwood, Mark B.
The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model
title The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model
title_full The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model
title_fullStr The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model
title_full_unstemmed The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model
title_short The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model
title_sort impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5967705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29795580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196968
work_keys_str_mv AT rodgerscooperd theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT meyeralissam theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT rosenbergnicolec theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT lukowskizacharyl theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT schaeferjamiel theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT martoranaginam theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT levinemonicaa theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT meyerscraiga theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT sherwoodmarkb theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT rodgerscooperd impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT meyeralissam impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT rosenbergnicolec impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT lukowskizacharyl impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT schaeferjamiel impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT martoranaginam impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT levinemonicaa impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT meyerscraiga impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel
AT sherwoodmarkb impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel