Cargando…
The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model
PURPOSE: To examine the effect of cannula diameter and conjunctival flap method on bleb survival in rabbits undergoing cannula-based glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS). METHODS: Twelve New Zealand White rabbits underwent GFS in both eyes. The twenty-four eyes were divided into four groups. Two of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5967705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29795580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196968 |
_version_ | 1783325637281316864 |
---|---|
author | Rodgers, Cooper D. Meyer, Alissa M. Rosenberg, Nicole C. Lukowski, Zachary L. Schaefer, Jamie L. Martorana, Gina M. Levine, Monica A. Meyers, Craig A. Sherwood, Mark B. |
author_facet | Rodgers, Cooper D. Meyer, Alissa M. Rosenberg, Nicole C. Lukowski, Zachary L. Schaefer, Jamie L. Martorana, Gina M. Levine, Monica A. Meyers, Craig A. Sherwood, Mark B. |
author_sort | Rodgers, Cooper D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To examine the effect of cannula diameter and conjunctival flap method on bleb survival in rabbits undergoing cannula-based glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS). METHODS: Twelve New Zealand White rabbits underwent GFS in both eyes. The twenty-four eyes were divided into four groups. Two of the four groups (N = 12) received limbus-based conjunctival flaps (LBCF), and the other two (N = 12) received fornix-based conjunctival flaps (FBCF). Six FBCF rabbit eyes were implanted with 22-gauge drainage tubes, and the other six were implanted with 26-gauge tubes. Likewise, six LBCF rabbits received 22-gauge drainage tubes and six received 26-gauge tubes. Filtration blebs were evaluated every three days by a masked observer. Bleb failure was defined as the primary endpoint in this study and was recorded after two consecutive flat bleb evaluations. RESULTS: Group 1 (LBCF, 22- gauge cannula) had a mean bleb survival time (Mean ± SD) of 18.7 ± 2.9 days. Group 2 (LBCF, 26-gauge cannula) also had a mean bleb survival time of 18.7 ± 2.9 days. Group 3 (FBCF, 22-gauge cannula) had a mean bleb survival time of 19.2 ± 3.8 days. Group 4 (FBCF, 26-gauge cannula) had a mean bleb survival time of 19.7 ± 4.1 days. A 2-way analysis of variance showed that neither surgical approach nor cannula gauge made a statistically significant difference in bleb survival time (P = 0.634 and P = 0.874). Additionally, there was no significant interaction between cannula gauge and conjunctival flap approach (P = 0.874), suggesting that there was not a combination of drainage gauge and conjunctival flap method that produced superior bleb survival. CONCLUSION: Limbus and fornix-based conjunctival flaps are equally effective in promoting bleb survival using both 22 and 26-gauge cannulas in the rabbit model. The 26-gauge drainage tube may be preferred because its smaller size facilitates the implantation process, reducing the risk of corneal contact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5967705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59677052018-06-08 The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model Rodgers, Cooper D. Meyer, Alissa M. Rosenberg, Nicole C. Lukowski, Zachary L. Schaefer, Jamie L. Martorana, Gina M. Levine, Monica A. Meyers, Craig A. Sherwood, Mark B. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To examine the effect of cannula diameter and conjunctival flap method on bleb survival in rabbits undergoing cannula-based glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS). METHODS: Twelve New Zealand White rabbits underwent GFS in both eyes. The twenty-four eyes were divided into four groups. Two of the four groups (N = 12) received limbus-based conjunctival flaps (LBCF), and the other two (N = 12) received fornix-based conjunctival flaps (FBCF). Six FBCF rabbit eyes were implanted with 22-gauge drainage tubes, and the other six were implanted with 26-gauge tubes. Likewise, six LBCF rabbits received 22-gauge drainage tubes and six received 26-gauge tubes. Filtration blebs were evaluated every three days by a masked observer. Bleb failure was defined as the primary endpoint in this study and was recorded after two consecutive flat bleb evaluations. RESULTS: Group 1 (LBCF, 22- gauge cannula) had a mean bleb survival time (Mean ± SD) of 18.7 ± 2.9 days. Group 2 (LBCF, 26-gauge cannula) also had a mean bleb survival time of 18.7 ± 2.9 days. Group 3 (FBCF, 22-gauge cannula) had a mean bleb survival time of 19.2 ± 3.8 days. Group 4 (FBCF, 26-gauge cannula) had a mean bleb survival time of 19.7 ± 4.1 days. A 2-way analysis of variance showed that neither surgical approach nor cannula gauge made a statistically significant difference in bleb survival time (P = 0.634 and P = 0.874). Additionally, there was no significant interaction between cannula gauge and conjunctival flap approach (P = 0.874), suggesting that there was not a combination of drainage gauge and conjunctival flap method that produced superior bleb survival. CONCLUSION: Limbus and fornix-based conjunctival flaps are equally effective in promoting bleb survival using both 22 and 26-gauge cannulas in the rabbit model. The 26-gauge drainage tube may be preferred because its smaller size facilitates the implantation process, reducing the risk of corneal contact. Public Library of Science 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5967705/ /pubmed/29795580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196968 Text en © 2018 Rodgers et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rodgers, Cooper D. Meyer, Alissa M. Rosenberg, Nicole C. Lukowski, Zachary L. Schaefer, Jamie L. Martorana, Gina M. Levine, Monica A. Meyers, Craig A. Sherwood, Mark B. The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model |
title | The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model |
title_full | The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model |
title_fullStr | The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model |
title_short | The impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model |
title_sort | impact of conjunctival flap method and drainage cannula diameter on bleb survival in the rabbit model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5967705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29795580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196968 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodgerscooperd theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT meyeralissam theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT rosenbergnicolec theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT lukowskizacharyl theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT schaeferjamiel theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT martoranaginam theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT levinemonicaa theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT meyerscraiga theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT sherwoodmarkb theimpactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT rodgerscooperd impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT meyeralissam impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT rosenbergnicolec impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT lukowskizacharyl impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT schaeferjamiel impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT martoranaginam impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT levinemonicaa impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT meyerscraiga impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel AT sherwoodmarkb impactofconjunctivalflapmethodanddrainagecannuladiameteronblebsurvivalintherabbitmodel |