Cargando…

The South African Rea Phela Health Study: A randomized controlled trial of communication retention strategies

Epidemiological transitions are occurring throughout Africa. To inform public health programs and policies, longitudinal cohorts investigating non-communicable diseases are needed. However, loss-to-follow up is a major problem. In preparation for a longitudinal study, we conducted a randomized contr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhyne, James M., Mumbauer, Alexandra, Rheeder, Paul, Hall, Megan N., Genkinger, Jeanine, Medina-Marino, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5967788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29795579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196900
_version_ 1783325649846403072
author Rhyne, James M.
Mumbauer, Alexandra
Rheeder, Paul
Hall, Megan N.
Genkinger, Jeanine
Medina-Marino, Andrew
author_facet Rhyne, James M.
Mumbauer, Alexandra
Rheeder, Paul
Hall, Megan N.
Genkinger, Jeanine
Medina-Marino, Andrew
author_sort Rhyne, James M.
collection PubMed
description Epidemiological transitions are occurring throughout Africa. To inform public health programs and policies, longitudinal cohorts investigating non-communicable diseases are needed. However, loss-to-follow up is a major problem. In preparation for a longitudinal study, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to test communication-based retention strategies (message content and delivery methods) among a pilot cohort of South African healthcare workers (n = 1536; median age = 36; women = 1270). Two messaging formats across three delivery modes were tested. Response rates were analyzed by intervention, survey return date and method using chi-square tests and univariate logistic regression. Sixty-seven of 238 (17.4%) control group participants and 238 of 1152 (24.6%) intervention group participants were retained (OR 1.54: CI 1.15–2.07; P = 0.004). Odds of being retained were 1.68 times greater for participants who received regular contact and themed messages compared to control (CI 1.22–2.32; P = 0.001). Neither health status nor clinical condition affected response rates (P>0.05). Time-to-first contact did not impact response rates (P>0.05). Message content and delivery method influenced response rates compared to the control, however no difference was found between intervention groups. Although greater retention is required for valid cohort studies, these findings are the first to quantitatively assess retention factors in Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5967788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59677882018-06-08 The South African Rea Phela Health Study: A randomized controlled trial of communication retention strategies Rhyne, James M. Mumbauer, Alexandra Rheeder, Paul Hall, Megan N. Genkinger, Jeanine Medina-Marino, Andrew PLoS One Research Article Epidemiological transitions are occurring throughout Africa. To inform public health programs and policies, longitudinal cohorts investigating non-communicable diseases are needed. However, loss-to-follow up is a major problem. In preparation for a longitudinal study, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to test communication-based retention strategies (message content and delivery methods) among a pilot cohort of South African healthcare workers (n = 1536; median age = 36; women = 1270). Two messaging formats across three delivery modes were tested. Response rates were analyzed by intervention, survey return date and method using chi-square tests and univariate logistic regression. Sixty-seven of 238 (17.4%) control group participants and 238 of 1152 (24.6%) intervention group participants were retained (OR 1.54: CI 1.15–2.07; P = 0.004). Odds of being retained were 1.68 times greater for participants who received regular contact and themed messages compared to control (CI 1.22–2.32; P = 0.001). Neither health status nor clinical condition affected response rates (P>0.05). Time-to-first contact did not impact response rates (P>0.05). Message content and delivery method influenced response rates compared to the control, however no difference was found between intervention groups. Although greater retention is required for valid cohort studies, these findings are the first to quantitatively assess retention factors in Africa. Public Library of Science 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5967788/ /pubmed/29795579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196900 Text en © 2018 Rhyne et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rhyne, James M.
Mumbauer, Alexandra
Rheeder, Paul
Hall, Megan N.
Genkinger, Jeanine
Medina-Marino, Andrew
The South African Rea Phela Health Study: A randomized controlled trial of communication retention strategies
title The South African Rea Phela Health Study: A randomized controlled trial of communication retention strategies
title_full The South African Rea Phela Health Study: A randomized controlled trial of communication retention strategies
title_fullStr The South African Rea Phela Health Study: A randomized controlled trial of communication retention strategies
title_full_unstemmed The South African Rea Phela Health Study: A randomized controlled trial of communication retention strategies
title_short The South African Rea Phela Health Study: A randomized controlled trial of communication retention strategies
title_sort south african rea phela health study: a randomized controlled trial of communication retention strategies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5967788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29795579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196900
work_keys_str_mv AT rhynejamesm thesouthafricanreaphelahealthstudyarandomizedcontrolledtrialofcommunicationretentionstrategies
AT mumbaueralexandra thesouthafricanreaphelahealthstudyarandomizedcontrolledtrialofcommunicationretentionstrategies
AT rheederpaul thesouthafricanreaphelahealthstudyarandomizedcontrolledtrialofcommunicationretentionstrategies
AT hallmegann thesouthafricanreaphelahealthstudyarandomizedcontrolledtrialofcommunicationretentionstrategies
AT genkingerjeanine thesouthafricanreaphelahealthstudyarandomizedcontrolledtrialofcommunicationretentionstrategies
AT medinamarinoandrew thesouthafricanreaphelahealthstudyarandomizedcontrolledtrialofcommunicationretentionstrategies
AT rhynejamesm southafricanreaphelahealthstudyarandomizedcontrolledtrialofcommunicationretentionstrategies
AT mumbaueralexandra southafricanreaphelahealthstudyarandomizedcontrolledtrialofcommunicationretentionstrategies
AT rheederpaul southafricanreaphelahealthstudyarandomizedcontrolledtrialofcommunicationretentionstrategies
AT hallmegann southafricanreaphelahealthstudyarandomizedcontrolledtrialofcommunicationretentionstrategies
AT genkingerjeanine southafricanreaphelahealthstudyarandomizedcontrolledtrialofcommunicationretentionstrategies
AT medinamarinoandrew southafricanreaphelahealthstudyarandomizedcontrolledtrialofcommunicationretentionstrategies