Cargando…

Survival outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention: Why the hype about stent type? Lessons from a healthcare system in India

A prospective, multicenter study was initiated by the Government of Maharashtra, India, to determine predictors of long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease, and to compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DESs) and bare-metal stents (BMSs) i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duggal, Bhanu, Subramanian, Jyothi, Duggal, Mona, Singh, Pushpendra, Rajivlochan, Meeta, Saunik, Sujata, Desiraju, Koundinya, Avhad, Archana, Ram, Usha, Sen, Sayan, Agrawal, Anurag
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5967815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29795604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196830
_version_ 1783325656084381696
author Duggal, Bhanu
Subramanian, Jyothi
Duggal, Mona
Singh, Pushpendra
Rajivlochan, Meeta
Saunik, Sujata
Desiraju, Koundinya
Avhad, Archana
Ram, Usha
Sen, Sayan
Agrawal, Anurag
author_facet Duggal, Bhanu
Subramanian, Jyothi
Duggal, Mona
Singh, Pushpendra
Rajivlochan, Meeta
Saunik, Sujata
Desiraju, Koundinya
Avhad, Archana
Ram, Usha
Sen, Sayan
Agrawal, Anurag
author_sort Duggal, Bhanu
collection PubMed
description A prospective, multicenter study was initiated by the Government of Maharashtra, India, to determine predictors of long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease, and to compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DESs) and bare-metal stents (BMSs) in patients undergoing PCI under government-funded insurance. The present analysis included 4595 patients managed between August 2012 and November 2016 at any of 110 participating centers. Using the classical multivariable regression and propensity-matching approach, we found age to be the most important predictor of 1-year mortality and target lesion revascularization at 1 year post-PCI. However, using machine learning methods to account for unmeasured confounders and bias in this large observational study, we determined total stent length and number of stents deployed as the most important predictors of 1-year survival, followed by age and employment status. The unadjusted death rates were 5.0% and 3.8% for the BMS and DES groups, respectively (p = 0.185, log-rank test). The rate of re-hospitalization (p<0.001) and recurrence of unstable angina (p = 0.08) was significantly lower for DESs than for BMSs. Increased use of DES after 2015 (following establishment of a price cap on DESs) was associated with a sharp decrease in adjusted hazard ratios of DESs versus BMSs (from 0.94 in 2013 to 0.58 in 2016), suggesting that high price was limiting DES use in some high-risk patients. Since stented length and stent number were the most important predictors of survival outcomes, adopting an ischemia-guided revascularization strategy is expected to help improve outcomes and reduce procedural costs. In the elderly, PCI should be reserved for cases where the benefits outweigh the higher risk of the procedure. As unemployed patients had poorer long-term outcomes, we expect that implementation of a post-PCI cardiovascular rehabilitation program may improve long-term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5967815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59678152018-06-08 Survival outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention: Why the hype about stent type? Lessons from a healthcare system in India Duggal, Bhanu Subramanian, Jyothi Duggal, Mona Singh, Pushpendra Rajivlochan, Meeta Saunik, Sujata Desiraju, Koundinya Avhad, Archana Ram, Usha Sen, Sayan Agrawal, Anurag PLoS One Research Article A prospective, multicenter study was initiated by the Government of Maharashtra, India, to determine predictors of long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease, and to compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DESs) and bare-metal stents (BMSs) in patients undergoing PCI under government-funded insurance. The present analysis included 4595 patients managed between August 2012 and November 2016 at any of 110 participating centers. Using the classical multivariable regression and propensity-matching approach, we found age to be the most important predictor of 1-year mortality and target lesion revascularization at 1 year post-PCI. However, using machine learning methods to account for unmeasured confounders and bias in this large observational study, we determined total stent length and number of stents deployed as the most important predictors of 1-year survival, followed by age and employment status. The unadjusted death rates were 5.0% and 3.8% for the BMS and DES groups, respectively (p = 0.185, log-rank test). The rate of re-hospitalization (p<0.001) and recurrence of unstable angina (p = 0.08) was significantly lower for DESs than for BMSs. Increased use of DES after 2015 (following establishment of a price cap on DESs) was associated with a sharp decrease in adjusted hazard ratios of DESs versus BMSs (from 0.94 in 2013 to 0.58 in 2016), suggesting that high price was limiting DES use in some high-risk patients. Since stented length and stent number were the most important predictors of survival outcomes, adopting an ischemia-guided revascularization strategy is expected to help improve outcomes and reduce procedural costs. In the elderly, PCI should be reserved for cases where the benefits outweigh the higher risk of the procedure. As unemployed patients had poorer long-term outcomes, we expect that implementation of a post-PCI cardiovascular rehabilitation program may improve long-term outcomes. Public Library of Science 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5967815/ /pubmed/29795604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196830 Text en © 2018 Duggal et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duggal, Bhanu
Subramanian, Jyothi
Duggal, Mona
Singh, Pushpendra
Rajivlochan, Meeta
Saunik, Sujata
Desiraju, Koundinya
Avhad, Archana
Ram, Usha
Sen, Sayan
Agrawal, Anurag
Survival outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention: Why the hype about stent type? Lessons from a healthcare system in India
title Survival outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention: Why the hype about stent type? Lessons from a healthcare system in India
title_full Survival outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention: Why the hype about stent type? Lessons from a healthcare system in India
title_fullStr Survival outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention: Why the hype about stent type? Lessons from a healthcare system in India
title_full_unstemmed Survival outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention: Why the hype about stent type? Lessons from a healthcare system in India
title_short Survival outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention: Why the hype about stent type? Lessons from a healthcare system in India
title_sort survival outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention: why the hype about stent type? lessons from a healthcare system in india
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5967815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29795604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196830
work_keys_str_mv AT duggalbhanu survivaloutcomespostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwhythehypeaboutstenttypelessonsfromahealthcaresysteminindia
AT subramanianjyothi survivaloutcomespostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwhythehypeaboutstenttypelessonsfromahealthcaresysteminindia
AT duggalmona survivaloutcomespostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwhythehypeaboutstenttypelessonsfromahealthcaresysteminindia
AT singhpushpendra survivaloutcomespostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwhythehypeaboutstenttypelessonsfromahealthcaresysteminindia
AT rajivlochanmeeta survivaloutcomespostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwhythehypeaboutstenttypelessonsfromahealthcaresysteminindia
AT sauniksujata survivaloutcomespostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwhythehypeaboutstenttypelessonsfromahealthcaresysteminindia
AT desirajukoundinya survivaloutcomespostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwhythehypeaboutstenttypelessonsfromahealthcaresysteminindia
AT avhadarchana survivaloutcomespostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwhythehypeaboutstenttypelessonsfromahealthcaresysteminindia
AT ramusha survivaloutcomespostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwhythehypeaboutstenttypelessonsfromahealthcaresysteminindia
AT sensayan survivaloutcomespostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwhythehypeaboutstenttypelessonsfromahealthcaresysteminindia
AT agrawalanurag survivaloutcomespostpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionwhythehypeaboutstenttypelessonsfromahealthcaresysteminindia