Cargando…
Flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies
Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Its potential to detect proximal neoplasms depends on colonoscopy referral. We estimated diagnostic performance of sigmoidoscopy using 12 different referral criteria in detecting colorectal cancer and advanced a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29752577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0404-x |
_version_ | 1783325690660126720 |
---|---|
author | Niedermaier, Tobias Weigl, Korbinian Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann |
author_facet | Niedermaier, Tobias Weigl, Korbinian Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann |
author_sort | Niedermaier, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Its potential to detect proximal neoplasms depends on colonoscopy referral. We estimated diagnostic performance of sigmoidoscopy using 12 different referral criteria in detecting colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas. Colonoscopy results from 14,947 participants of screening colonoscopy in Germany were used to derive sensitivity of sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer, advanced adenomas (AAs), and any advanced neoplasms in the proximal colon. It was assumed that FS detects the same neoplasms as colonoscopy within its reach and that distal neoplasms would be followed by colonoscopy. In addition, numbers of colonoscopies needed (NCN) to detect one proximal advanced neoplasm were calculated. The most advanced findings during colonoscopy were colorectal cancer in 213 subjects (1.4%), AA in 1539 subjects (10.2%) and non-advanced adenomas in 2988 subjects (19.8%). Without colonoscopy referral, overall sensitivities for any colorectal cancer, advanced adenoma and any advanced neoplasm (proximal or distal) would be 79, 65 and 66%, respectively. These sensitivities could be increased to up to 86, 83 and 84% by the referral strategies investigated. Compared to referral due to advanced adenomas, referral due to non-advanced adenomas would substantially increase the NCN at a modest gain in sensitivity. Sensitivities were higher and NCNs were lower in men than in women for every strategy. In conclusion, colonoscopy referral can substantially increase sensitivity of sigmoidoscopy-based screening, but the gain by referral due to non-advanced adenomas substantially increases NCN compared to referral due to advanced neoplasms only. Major sex differences may call for sex-specific referral strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10654-018-0404-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5968045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59680452018-06-04 Flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies Niedermaier, Tobias Weigl, Korbinian Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann Eur J Epidemiol Screening Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Its potential to detect proximal neoplasms depends on colonoscopy referral. We estimated diagnostic performance of sigmoidoscopy using 12 different referral criteria in detecting colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas. Colonoscopy results from 14,947 participants of screening colonoscopy in Germany were used to derive sensitivity of sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer, advanced adenomas (AAs), and any advanced neoplasms in the proximal colon. It was assumed that FS detects the same neoplasms as colonoscopy within its reach and that distal neoplasms would be followed by colonoscopy. In addition, numbers of colonoscopies needed (NCN) to detect one proximal advanced neoplasm were calculated. The most advanced findings during colonoscopy were colorectal cancer in 213 subjects (1.4%), AA in 1539 subjects (10.2%) and non-advanced adenomas in 2988 subjects (19.8%). Without colonoscopy referral, overall sensitivities for any colorectal cancer, advanced adenoma and any advanced neoplasm (proximal or distal) would be 79, 65 and 66%, respectively. These sensitivities could be increased to up to 86, 83 and 84% by the referral strategies investigated. Compared to referral due to advanced adenomas, referral due to non-advanced adenomas would substantially increase the NCN at a modest gain in sensitivity. Sensitivities were higher and NCNs were lower in men than in women for every strategy. In conclusion, colonoscopy referral can substantially increase sensitivity of sigmoidoscopy-based screening, but the gain by referral due to non-advanced adenomas substantially increases NCN compared to referral due to advanced neoplasms only. Major sex differences may call for sex-specific referral strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10654-018-0404-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2018-05-12 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5968045/ /pubmed/29752577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0404-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Screening Niedermaier, Tobias Weigl, Korbinian Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann Flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies |
title | Flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies |
title_full | Flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies |
title_fullStr | Flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies |
title_short | Flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies |
title_sort | flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: implications of different colonoscopy referral strategies |
topic | Screening |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29752577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0404-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niedermaiertobias flexiblesigmoidoscopyincolorectalcancerscreeningimplicationsofdifferentcolonoscopyreferralstrategies AT weiglkorbinian flexiblesigmoidoscopyincolorectalcancerscreeningimplicationsofdifferentcolonoscopyreferralstrategies AT hoffmeistermichael flexiblesigmoidoscopyincolorectalcancerscreeningimplicationsofdifferentcolonoscopyreferralstrategies AT brennerhermann flexiblesigmoidoscopyincolorectalcancerscreeningimplicationsofdifferentcolonoscopyreferralstrategies |