Cargando…

Huddling Conserves Energy, Decreases Core Body Temperature, but Increases Activity in Brandt's Voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii)

Huddling as social thermoregulatory behavior is commonly used by small mammals to reduce heat loss and energy expenditure in the cold. Our study aimed to determine the effect of huddling behavior on energy conservation, thermogenesis, core body temperature (T(b)) regulation and body composition in B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sukhchuluun, Gansukh, Zhang, Xue-Ying, Chi, Qing-Sheng, Wang, De-Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29867585
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00563
_version_ 1783325705678880768
author Sukhchuluun, Gansukh
Zhang, Xue-Ying
Chi, Qing-Sheng
Wang, De-Hua
author_facet Sukhchuluun, Gansukh
Zhang, Xue-Ying
Chi, Qing-Sheng
Wang, De-Hua
author_sort Sukhchuluun, Gansukh
collection PubMed
description Huddling as social thermoregulatory behavior is commonly used by small mammals to reduce heat loss and energy expenditure in the cold. Our study aimed to determine the effect of huddling behavior on energy conservation, thermogenesis, core body temperature (T(b)) regulation and body composition in Brandt's voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii). Adult captive-bred female Brandt's voles (n = 124) (~50 g) in 31 cages with 4 individuals each were exposed to cool (23 ± 1°C) and cold (4 ± 1°C) ambient temperatures (T(a)) and were allowed to huddle or were physically separated. The cold huddling (Cold-H) groups significantly reduced food intake by 29% and saved digestible energy 156.99 kJ/day compared with cold separated groups (Cold-S); in cool huddling groups (Cool-H) the reduction in food intake was 26% and digestible energy was saved by 105.19 kJ/day in comparison to the separated groups (Cool-S). Resting metabolic rate (RMR) of huddling groups was 35.7 and 37.2% lower than in separated groups at cold and cool T(a)s, respectively. Maximum non-shivering thermogenesis (NSTmax) of huddling voles was not affected by T(a), but in Cold-S voles it was significantly increased in comparison to Cool-S. Huddling groups decreased wet thermal conductance by 39% compared with separated groups in the cold, but not in the cool T(a). Unexpectedly, huddling voles significantly decreased T(b) by 0.25 – 0.50°C at each T(a). Nevertheless, activity of Cold-H voles was higher than in Cold-S voles. Thus, huddling is energetically highly effective because of reduced metabolic rate, thermogenic capacity and relaxed T(b) regulation despite the increase of activity. Therefore, Brandt's voles can remain active and maintain their body condition without increased energetic costs during cold exposure. This study highlights the ecological significance of huddling behavior for maintenance of individual fitness at low costs, and thus survival of population during severe winter in small mammals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5968109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59681092018-06-04 Huddling Conserves Energy, Decreases Core Body Temperature, but Increases Activity in Brandt's Voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii) Sukhchuluun, Gansukh Zhang, Xue-Ying Chi, Qing-Sheng Wang, De-Hua Front Physiol Physiology Huddling as social thermoregulatory behavior is commonly used by small mammals to reduce heat loss and energy expenditure in the cold. Our study aimed to determine the effect of huddling behavior on energy conservation, thermogenesis, core body temperature (T(b)) regulation and body composition in Brandt's voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii). Adult captive-bred female Brandt's voles (n = 124) (~50 g) in 31 cages with 4 individuals each were exposed to cool (23 ± 1°C) and cold (4 ± 1°C) ambient temperatures (T(a)) and were allowed to huddle or were physically separated. The cold huddling (Cold-H) groups significantly reduced food intake by 29% and saved digestible energy 156.99 kJ/day compared with cold separated groups (Cold-S); in cool huddling groups (Cool-H) the reduction in food intake was 26% and digestible energy was saved by 105.19 kJ/day in comparison to the separated groups (Cool-S). Resting metabolic rate (RMR) of huddling groups was 35.7 and 37.2% lower than in separated groups at cold and cool T(a)s, respectively. Maximum non-shivering thermogenesis (NSTmax) of huddling voles was not affected by T(a), but in Cold-S voles it was significantly increased in comparison to Cool-S. Huddling groups decreased wet thermal conductance by 39% compared with separated groups in the cold, but not in the cool T(a). Unexpectedly, huddling voles significantly decreased T(b) by 0.25 – 0.50°C at each T(a). Nevertheless, activity of Cold-H voles was higher than in Cold-S voles. Thus, huddling is energetically highly effective because of reduced metabolic rate, thermogenic capacity and relaxed T(b) regulation despite the increase of activity. Therefore, Brandt's voles can remain active and maintain their body condition without increased energetic costs during cold exposure. This study highlights the ecological significance of huddling behavior for maintenance of individual fitness at low costs, and thus survival of population during severe winter in small mammals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5968109/ /pubmed/29867585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00563 Text en Copyright © 2018 Sukhchuluun, Zhang, Chi and Wang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Sukhchuluun, Gansukh
Zhang, Xue-Ying
Chi, Qing-Sheng
Wang, De-Hua
Huddling Conserves Energy, Decreases Core Body Temperature, but Increases Activity in Brandt's Voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii)
title Huddling Conserves Energy, Decreases Core Body Temperature, but Increases Activity in Brandt's Voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii)
title_full Huddling Conserves Energy, Decreases Core Body Temperature, but Increases Activity in Brandt's Voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii)
title_fullStr Huddling Conserves Energy, Decreases Core Body Temperature, but Increases Activity in Brandt's Voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii)
title_full_unstemmed Huddling Conserves Energy, Decreases Core Body Temperature, but Increases Activity in Brandt's Voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii)
title_short Huddling Conserves Energy, Decreases Core Body Temperature, but Increases Activity in Brandt's Voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii)
title_sort huddling conserves energy, decreases core body temperature, but increases activity in brandt's voles (lasiopodomys brandtii)
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29867585
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00563
work_keys_str_mv AT sukhchuluungansukh huddlingconservesenergydecreasescorebodytemperaturebutincreasesactivityinbrandtsvoleslasiopodomysbrandtii
AT zhangxueying huddlingconservesenergydecreasescorebodytemperaturebutincreasesactivityinbrandtsvoleslasiopodomysbrandtii
AT chiqingsheng huddlingconservesenergydecreasescorebodytemperaturebutincreasesactivityinbrandtsvoleslasiopodomysbrandtii
AT wangdehua huddlingconservesenergydecreasescorebodytemperaturebutincreasesactivityinbrandtsvoleslasiopodomysbrandtii