Cargando…

Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing

Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) greatly improves measurement efficiency in high-stakes testing operations through the selection and administration of test items with the difficulty level that is most relevant to each individual test taker. This paper explains the 3 components of a conventional C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Han, Kyung (Chris) Tyek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29575849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.7
_version_ 1783325732438540288
author Han, Kyung (Chris) Tyek
author_facet Han, Kyung (Chris) Tyek
author_sort Han, Kyung (Chris) Tyek
collection PubMed
description Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) greatly improves measurement efficiency in high-stakes testing operations through the selection and administration of test items with the difficulty level that is most relevant to each individual test taker. This paper explains the 3 components of a conventional CAT item selection algorithm: test content balancing, the item selection criterion, and item exposure control. Several noteworthy methodologies underlie each component. The test script method and constrained CAT method are used for test content balancing. Item selection criteria include the maximized Fisher information criterion, the b-matching method, the a-stratification method, the weighted likelihood information criterion, the efficiency balanced information criterion, and the Kullback-Leibler information criterion. The randomesque method, the Sympson-Hetter method, the unconditional and conditional multinomial methods, and the fade-away method are used for item exposure control. Several holistic approaches to CAT use automated test assembly methods, such as the shadow test approach and the weighted deviation model. Item usage and exposure count vary depending on the item selection criterion and exposure control method. Finally, other important factors to consider when determining an appropriate CAT design are the computer resources requirement, the size of item pools, and the test length. The logic of CAT is now being adopted in the field of adaptive learning, which integrates the learning aspect and the (formative) assessment aspect of education into a continuous, individualized learning experience. Therefore, the algorithms and technologies described in this review may be able to help medical health educators and high-stakes test developers to adopt CAT more actively and efficiently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5968224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59682242018-06-12 Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing Han, Kyung (Chris) Tyek J Educ Eval Health Prof Review Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) greatly improves measurement efficiency in high-stakes testing operations through the selection and administration of test items with the difficulty level that is most relevant to each individual test taker. This paper explains the 3 components of a conventional CAT item selection algorithm: test content balancing, the item selection criterion, and item exposure control. Several noteworthy methodologies underlie each component. The test script method and constrained CAT method are used for test content balancing. Item selection criteria include the maximized Fisher information criterion, the b-matching method, the a-stratification method, the weighted likelihood information criterion, the efficiency balanced information criterion, and the Kullback-Leibler information criterion. The randomesque method, the Sympson-Hetter method, the unconditional and conditional multinomial methods, and the fade-away method are used for item exposure control. Several holistic approaches to CAT use automated test assembly methods, such as the shadow test approach and the weighted deviation model. Item usage and exposure count vary depending on the item selection criterion and exposure control method. Finally, other important factors to consider when determining an appropriate CAT design are the computer resources requirement, the size of item pools, and the test length. The logic of CAT is now being adopted in the field of adaptive learning, which integrates the learning aspect and the (formative) assessment aspect of education into a continuous, individualized learning experience. Therefore, the algorithms and technologies described in this review may be able to help medical health educators and high-stakes test developers to adopt CAT more actively and efficiently. Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute 2018-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5968224/ /pubmed/29575849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.7 Text en © 2018, Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Han, Kyung (Chris) Tyek
Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing
title Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing
title_full Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing
title_fullStr Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing
title_full_unstemmed Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing
title_short Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing
title_sort components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29575849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.7
work_keys_str_mv AT hankyungchristyek componentsoftheitemselectionalgorithmincomputerizedadaptivetesting