Cargando…

Epinephrine in the Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Preliminary Study

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) ranges between 15 and 20% among patients at high risk of developing PEP. The efficacy of indomethacin administration in the preventio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatami, Behzad, Kashfi, Seyed Mohammad Hossein, Abbasinazari, Mohammad, Nazemalhosseini Mojarad, Ehsan, Pourhoseingholi, Mohammad Amin, Zali, Mohammad Reza, Mohammad Alizadeh, Amir Houshang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000479494
_version_ 1783325735687028736
author Hatami, Behzad
Kashfi, Seyed Mohammad Hossein
Abbasinazari, Mohammad
Nazemalhosseini Mojarad, Ehsan
Pourhoseingholi, Mohammad Amin
Zali, Mohammad Reza
Mohammad Alizadeh, Amir Houshang
author_facet Hatami, Behzad
Kashfi, Seyed Mohammad Hossein
Abbasinazari, Mohammad
Nazemalhosseini Mojarad, Ehsan
Pourhoseingholi, Mohammad Amin
Zali, Mohammad Reza
Mohammad Alizadeh, Amir Houshang
author_sort Hatami, Behzad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) ranges between 15 and 20% among patients at high risk of developing PEP. The efficacy of indomethacin administration in the prevention of PEP is rather debatable. In the present randomized trial study, we evaluated whether or not the combination of indomethacin and epinephrine in comparison to the single administration of indomethacin differs in the pathogenesis and prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety-two patients were randomized in a double-blinded manner into 3 groups: the epinephrine group (group A), the indomethacin group (group B), and the combined epinephrine and indomethacin group (group C). After the procedure, patients were evaluated for the PEP development. RESULTS: During the procedure, 66 patients were randomized to the epinephrine group (group A), 68 cases to the indomethacin group (group B), and 58 individuals to the indomethacin-epinephrine group (group C). The mean age of patients in the epinephrine group was 59.59 ± 15.680 years, in the indomethacin group it was 58.06 ± 17.125 years, and in the combination group it was 59.62 ± 15.369 years. In the present study, we did not observe a significant difference between the 3 groups in sex, age, pre-ERCP amylase, lipase, and patient and procedure risk factors including pancreatic duct (PD) dilation (p = 0.404), PD cannulation (p = 0.329), and difficult cannulation (p = 0.076) among others. PEP developed in 7 of the 192 individuals (3.6%), 6 PEP cases occurred in the indomethacin group and 1 in the epinephrine group (p = 0.016). Univariate analysis of risk factors for PEP in patients with and without pancreatitis revealed no significant difference between the pancreatitis group and the non-pancreatitis group. CONCLUSION: In comparison to the administration of indomethacin alone, a single application of epinephrine and the combination of epinephrine and indomethacin seem to be effective in reducing the cases of PEP. A further randomized clinical trial with a larger sample size is required to confirm the efficacy of our medication in the prevention of pancreatitis after ERCP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5968254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59682542018-05-25 Epinephrine in the Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Preliminary Study Hatami, Behzad Kashfi, Seyed Mohammad Hossein Abbasinazari, Mohammad Nazemalhosseini Mojarad, Ehsan Pourhoseingholi, Mohammad Amin Zali, Mohammad Reza Mohammad Alizadeh, Amir Houshang Case Rep Gastroenterol Case Series BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) ranges between 15 and 20% among patients at high risk of developing PEP. The efficacy of indomethacin administration in the prevention of PEP is rather debatable. In the present randomized trial study, we evaluated whether or not the combination of indomethacin and epinephrine in comparison to the single administration of indomethacin differs in the pathogenesis and prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety-two patients were randomized in a double-blinded manner into 3 groups: the epinephrine group (group A), the indomethacin group (group B), and the combined epinephrine and indomethacin group (group C). After the procedure, patients were evaluated for the PEP development. RESULTS: During the procedure, 66 patients were randomized to the epinephrine group (group A), 68 cases to the indomethacin group (group B), and 58 individuals to the indomethacin-epinephrine group (group C). The mean age of patients in the epinephrine group was 59.59 ± 15.680 years, in the indomethacin group it was 58.06 ± 17.125 years, and in the combination group it was 59.62 ± 15.369 years. In the present study, we did not observe a significant difference between the 3 groups in sex, age, pre-ERCP amylase, lipase, and patient and procedure risk factors including pancreatic duct (PD) dilation (p = 0.404), PD cannulation (p = 0.329), and difficult cannulation (p = 0.076) among others. PEP developed in 7 of the 192 individuals (3.6%), 6 PEP cases occurred in the indomethacin group and 1 in the epinephrine group (p = 0.016). Univariate analysis of risk factors for PEP in patients with and without pancreatitis revealed no significant difference between the pancreatitis group and the non-pancreatitis group. CONCLUSION: In comparison to the administration of indomethacin alone, a single application of epinephrine and the combination of epinephrine and indomethacin seem to be effective in reducing the cases of PEP. A further randomized clinical trial with a larger sample size is required to confirm the efficacy of our medication in the prevention of pancreatitis after ERCP. S. Karger AG 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5968254/ /pubmed/29805355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000479494 Text en Copyright © 2018 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Case Series
Hatami, Behzad
Kashfi, Seyed Mohammad Hossein
Abbasinazari, Mohammad
Nazemalhosseini Mojarad, Ehsan
Pourhoseingholi, Mohammad Amin
Zali, Mohammad Reza
Mohammad Alizadeh, Amir Houshang
Epinephrine in the Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Preliminary Study
title Epinephrine in the Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Preliminary Study
title_full Epinephrine in the Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Preliminary Study
title_fullStr Epinephrine in the Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Preliminary Study
title_full_unstemmed Epinephrine in the Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Preliminary Study
title_short Epinephrine in the Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Preliminary Study
title_sort epinephrine in the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a preliminary study
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000479494
work_keys_str_mv AT hatamibehzad epinephrineinthepreventionofpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisapreliminarystudy
AT kashfiseyedmohammadhossein epinephrineinthepreventionofpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisapreliminarystudy
AT abbasinazarimohammad epinephrineinthepreventionofpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisapreliminarystudy
AT nazemalhosseinimojaradehsan epinephrineinthepreventionofpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisapreliminarystudy
AT pourhoseingholimohammadamin epinephrineinthepreventionofpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisapreliminarystudy
AT zalimohammadreza epinephrineinthepreventionofpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisapreliminarystudy
AT mohammadalizadehamirhoushang epinephrineinthepreventionofpostendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographypancreatitisapreliminarystudy