Cargando…

Effect of altering breathing frequency on maximum voluntary ventilation in healthy adults

BACKGROUND: Compared to other pulmonary function tests, there is a lack of standardization regarding how a maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) maneuver is performed. Specifically, little is known about the variation in breathing frequency (f(R)) and its potential impact on the accuracy of test resul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neufeld, Eric V., Dolezal, Brett A., Speier, William, Cooper, Christopher B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29793460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0650-4
_version_ 1783325793832665088
author Neufeld, Eric V.
Dolezal, Brett A.
Speier, William
Cooper, Christopher B.
author_facet Neufeld, Eric V.
Dolezal, Brett A.
Speier, William
Cooper, Christopher B.
author_sort Neufeld, Eric V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Compared to other pulmonary function tests, there is a lack of standardization regarding how a maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) maneuver is performed. Specifically, little is known about the variation in breathing frequency (f(R)) and its potential impact on the accuracy of test results. This study examines the effect of several preselected values for f(R) and one self-selected f(R) (f(Rself)) on MVV. METHODS: Ten participants performed MVV maneuvers at various f(R) values, ranging from 50 to 130 breaths·min(− 1) in 10 breaths·min(− 1) intervals and at one f(Rself). Three identical trials with 2-min rest periods were conducted at each f(R), and the sequence in which f(R) was tested was randomized. Ventilation and related parameters were measured directly by gas exchange analysis via a metabolic measurement system. RESULTS: A third-order polynomial regression analysis showed that MVV = − 0.0001(f(R))(3) + 0.0258(f(R))(2)–1.38(f(R)) + 96.9 at preselected f(R) and increased up to approximately 100 breaths·min(− 1) (r(2) = 0.982, P < 0.001). Paired t-tests indicated that average MVV values obtained at all preselected f(R) values, but not f(Rself), were significantly lower than the average maximum value across all participants. A linear regression analysis revealed that tidal volume (V(T)) = − 2.63(MVV) + 300.4 at preselected f(R) (r(2) = 0.846, P < 0.001); however, this inverse relationship between V(T) and MVV did not remain true for the self-selected f(R). The V(T) obtained at this f(R) (90.9 ± 19.1% of maximum) was significantly greater than the V(T) associated with the most similar MVV value (at a preselected f(R) of 100 breaths·min(− 1), 62.0 ± 10.4% of maximum; 95% confidence interval of difference: (17.5, 40.4%), P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the shortcomings of the current lack of standardization in MVV testing and establishes data-driven recommendations for optimal f(R). The true MVV was obtained with a self-selected f(R) (mean ± SD: 69.9 ± 22.3 breaths·min(− 1)) or within a preselected f(R) range of 110–120 breaths·min(− 1). Until a comprehensive reference equation is established, it is advised that MVV be measured directly using these guidelines. If an individual is unable to perform or performs the maneuver poorly at a self-selected f(R), ventilating within a mandated f(R) range of 110–120 breaths·min(− 1) may also be acceptable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5968560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59685602018-05-30 Effect of altering breathing frequency on maximum voluntary ventilation in healthy adults Neufeld, Eric V. Dolezal, Brett A. Speier, William Cooper, Christopher B. BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Compared to other pulmonary function tests, there is a lack of standardization regarding how a maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) maneuver is performed. Specifically, little is known about the variation in breathing frequency (f(R)) and its potential impact on the accuracy of test results. This study examines the effect of several preselected values for f(R) and one self-selected f(R) (f(Rself)) on MVV. METHODS: Ten participants performed MVV maneuvers at various f(R) values, ranging from 50 to 130 breaths·min(− 1) in 10 breaths·min(− 1) intervals and at one f(Rself). Three identical trials with 2-min rest periods were conducted at each f(R), and the sequence in which f(R) was tested was randomized. Ventilation and related parameters were measured directly by gas exchange analysis via a metabolic measurement system. RESULTS: A third-order polynomial regression analysis showed that MVV = − 0.0001(f(R))(3) + 0.0258(f(R))(2)–1.38(f(R)) + 96.9 at preselected f(R) and increased up to approximately 100 breaths·min(− 1) (r(2) = 0.982, P < 0.001). Paired t-tests indicated that average MVV values obtained at all preselected f(R) values, but not f(Rself), were significantly lower than the average maximum value across all participants. A linear regression analysis revealed that tidal volume (V(T)) = − 2.63(MVV) + 300.4 at preselected f(R) (r(2) = 0.846, P < 0.001); however, this inverse relationship between V(T) and MVV did not remain true for the self-selected f(R). The V(T) obtained at this f(R) (90.9 ± 19.1% of maximum) was significantly greater than the V(T) associated with the most similar MVV value (at a preselected f(R) of 100 breaths·min(− 1), 62.0 ± 10.4% of maximum; 95% confidence interval of difference: (17.5, 40.4%), P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the shortcomings of the current lack of standardization in MVV testing and establishes data-driven recommendations for optimal f(R). The true MVV was obtained with a self-selected f(R) (mean ± SD: 69.9 ± 22.3 breaths·min(− 1)) or within a preselected f(R) range of 110–120 breaths·min(− 1). Until a comprehensive reference equation is established, it is advised that MVV be measured directly using these guidelines. If an individual is unable to perform or performs the maneuver poorly at a self-selected f(R), ventilating within a mandated f(R) range of 110–120 breaths·min(− 1) may also be acceptable. BioMed Central 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5968560/ /pubmed/29793460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0650-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Neufeld, Eric V.
Dolezal, Brett A.
Speier, William
Cooper, Christopher B.
Effect of altering breathing frequency on maximum voluntary ventilation in healthy adults
title Effect of altering breathing frequency on maximum voluntary ventilation in healthy adults
title_full Effect of altering breathing frequency on maximum voluntary ventilation in healthy adults
title_fullStr Effect of altering breathing frequency on maximum voluntary ventilation in healthy adults
title_full_unstemmed Effect of altering breathing frequency on maximum voluntary ventilation in healthy adults
title_short Effect of altering breathing frequency on maximum voluntary ventilation in healthy adults
title_sort effect of altering breathing frequency on maximum voluntary ventilation in healthy adults
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29793460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0650-4
work_keys_str_mv AT neufeldericv effectofalteringbreathingfrequencyonmaximumvoluntaryventilationinhealthyadults
AT dolezalbretta effectofalteringbreathingfrequencyonmaximumvoluntaryventilationinhealthyadults
AT speierwilliam effectofalteringbreathingfrequencyonmaximumvoluntaryventilationinhealthyadults
AT cooperchristopherb effectofalteringbreathingfrequencyonmaximumvoluntaryventilationinhealthyadults