Cargando…

A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A major concern of orthodontic patients is treatment time. Reducing the treatment time requires increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Research has proved that bone resorption is the rate-limiting step in tooth movement. Therefore, any procedure that potentiate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arumughan, Saran, Somaiah, Sanju, Muddaiah, Sunil, Shetty, Balakrishna, Reddy, Goutham, Roopa, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29875571
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_857_17
_version_ 1783325822073962496
author Arumughan, Saran
Somaiah, Sanju
Muddaiah, Sunil
Shetty, Balakrishna
Reddy, Goutham
Roopa, S
author_facet Arumughan, Saran
Somaiah, Sanju
Muddaiah, Sunil
Shetty, Balakrishna
Reddy, Goutham
Roopa, S
author_sort Arumughan, Saran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A major concern of orthodontic patients is treatment time. Reducing the treatment time requires increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Research has proved that bone resorption is the rate-limiting step in tooth movement. Therefore, any procedure that potentiates osteoclastic activity is capable of increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Low-level laser has been indicated to have the capability to facilitate the differentiation of the osteoclastic and osteoblastic cells, which are responsible for the bone remodeling process. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the low-level laser therapy can accelerate orthodontic tooth movement during en masse retraction. METHOD: The study was a split-mouth design. The experimental side was exposed to biostimulation using 810 nm gallium-aluminium-arsenide diode laser. A total of 10 irradiations for 10 s per site were given 5 on the buccal side and 5 on the palatal side of the tooth. The total energy density at each application was 10 J with an interappointment gap of 3 weeks. The retraction was carried using a constant force of 150 gm. A digital vernier caliper measurement was used to measure the distance between the contact points of the maxillary canine and second premolar on 1(st) and 84(th) day. RESULTS: The rate of orthodontic tooth movement was faster on the experimental side, and the difference between the two sides was statistically significant (P < 0.014). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: It was concluded that biostimulation carried out using an 810 nm diode laser is capable of increasing the rate of extraction space closure. Hence, it is capable of increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5968693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59686932018-06-06 A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique Arumughan, Saran Somaiah, Sanju Muddaiah, Sunil Shetty, Balakrishna Reddy, Goutham Roopa, S Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A major concern of orthodontic patients is treatment time. Reducing the treatment time requires increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Research has proved that bone resorption is the rate-limiting step in tooth movement. Therefore, any procedure that potentiates osteoclastic activity is capable of increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Low-level laser has been indicated to have the capability to facilitate the differentiation of the osteoclastic and osteoblastic cells, which are responsible for the bone remodeling process. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the low-level laser therapy can accelerate orthodontic tooth movement during en masse retraction. METHOD: The study was a split-mouth design. The experimental side was exposed to biostimulation using 810 nm gallium-aluminium-arsenide diode laser. A total of 10 irradiations for 10 s per site were given 5 on the buccal side and 5 on the palatal side of the tooth. The total energy density at each application was 10 J with an interappointment gap of 3 weeks. The retraction was carried using a constant force of 150 gm. A digital vernier caliper measurement was used to measure the distance between the contact points of the maxillary canine and second premolar on 1(st) and 84(th) day. RESULTS: The rate of orthodontic tooth movement was faster on the experimental side, and the difference between the two sides was statistically significant (P < 0.014). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: It was concluded that biostimulation carried out using an 810 nm diode laser is capable of increasing the rate of extraction space closure. Hence, it is capable of increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5968693/ /pubmed/29875571 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_857_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Arumughan, Saran
Somaiah, Sanju
Muddaiah, Sunil
Shetty, Balakrishna
Reddy, Goutham
Roopa, S
A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique
title A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique
title_full A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique
title_short A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique
title_sort comparison of the rate of retraction with low-level laser therapy and conventional retraction technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29875571
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_857_17
work_keys_str_mv AT arumughansaran acomparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique
AT somaiahsanju acomparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique
AT muddaiahsunil acomparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique
AT shettybalakrishna acomparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique
AT reddygoutham acomparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique
AT roopas acomparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique
AT arumughansaran comparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique
AT somaiahsanju comparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique
AT muddaiahsunil comparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique
AT shettybalakrishna comparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique
AT reddygoutham comparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique
AT roopas comparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique