Cargando…
A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A major concern of orthodontic patients is treatment time. Reducing the treatment time requires increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Research has proved that bone resorption is the rate-limiting step in tooth movement. Therefore, any procedure that potentiate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29875571 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_857_17 |
_version_ | 1783325822073962496 |
---|---|
author | Arumughan, Saran Somaiah, Sanju Muddaiah, Sunil Shetty, Balakrishna Reddy, Goutham Roopa, S |
author_facet | Arumughan, Saran Somaiah, Sanju Muddaiah, Sunil Shetty, Balakrishna Reddy, Goutham Roopa, S |
author_sort | Arumughan, Saran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A major concern of orthodontic patients is treatment time. Reducing the treatment time requires increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Research has proved that bone resorption is the rate-limiting step in tooth movement. Therefore, any procedure that potentiates osteoclastic activity is capable of increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Low-level laser has been indicated to have the capability to facilitate the differentiation of the osteoclastic and osteoblastic cells, which are responsible for the bone remodeling process. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the low-level laser therapy can accelerate orthodontic tooth movement during en masse retraction. METHOD: The study was a split-mouth design. The experimental side was exposed to biostimulation using 810 nm gallium-aluminium-arsenide diode laser. A total of 10 irradiations for 10 s per site were given 5 on the buccal side and 5 on the palatal side of the tooth. The total energy density at each application was 10 J with an interappointment gap of 3 weeks. The retraction was carried using a constant force of 150 gm. A digital vernier caliper measurement was used to measure the distance between the contact points of the maxillary canine and second premolar on 1(st) and 84(th) day. RESULTS: The rate of orthodontic tooth movement was faster on the experimental side, and the difference between the two sides was statistically significant (P < 0.014). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: It was concluded that biostimulation carried out using an 810 nm diode laser is capable of increasing the rate of extraction space closure. Hence, it is capable of increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5968693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59686932018-06-06 A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique Arumughan, Saran Somaiah, Sanju Muddaiah, Sunil Shetty, Balakrishna Reddy, Goutham Roopa, S Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A major concern of orthodontic patients is treatment time. Reducing the treatment time requires increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Research has proved that bone resorption is the rate-limiting step in tooth movement. Therefore, any procedure that potentiates osteoclastic activity is capable of increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Low-level laser has been indicated to have the capability to facilitate the differentiation of the osteoclastic and osteoblastic cells, which are responsible for the bone remodeling process. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the low-level laser therapy can accelerate orthodontic tooth movement during en masse retraction. METHOD: The study was a split-mouth design. The experimental side was exposed to biostimulation using 810 nm gallium-aluminium-arsenide diode laser. A total of 10 irradiations for 10 s per site were given 5 on the buccal side and 5 on the palatal side of the tooth. The total energy density at each application was 10 J with an interappointment gap of 3 weeks. The retraction was carried using a constant force of 150 gm. A digital vernier caliper measurement was used to measure the distance between the contact points of the maxillary canine and second premolar on 1(st) and 84(th) day. RESULTS: The rate of orthodontic tooth movement was faster on the experimental side, and the difference between the two sides was statistically significant (P < 0.014). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: It was concluded that biostimulation carried out using an 810 nm diode laser is capable of increasing the rate of extraction space closure. Hence, it is capable of increasing the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5968693/ /pubmed/29875571 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_857_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Arumughan, Saran Somaiah, Sanju Muddaiah, Sunil Shetty, Balakrishna Reddy, Goutham Roopa, S A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique |
title | A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique |
title_full | A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique |
title_short | A Comparison of the Rate of Retraction with Low-level Laser Therapy and Conventional Retraction Technique |
title_sort | comparison of the rate of retraction with low-level laser therapy and conventional retraction technique |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29875571 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_857_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arumughansaran acomparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique AT somaiahsanju acomparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique AT muddaiahsunil acomparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique AT shettybalakrishna acomparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique AT reddygoutham acomparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique AT roopas acomparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique AT arumughansaran comparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique AT somaiahsanju comparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique AT muddaiahsunil comparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique AT shettybalakrishna comparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique AT reddygoutham comparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique AT roopas comparisonoftherateofretractionwithlowlevellasertherapyandconventionalretractiontechnique |