Cargando…

Sorafenib Monotherapy Versus Sorafenib Combined with Regional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis

Background: Sorafenib has been recommended as the standard therapy for advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the difference in overall survival (OS) between treatments with sorafenib combined with regional therapies versus sorafenib mon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jinbin, Lu, Shixun, Zhang, Yaojun, Xu, Li, Chen, Jiancong, Wang, Juncheng, Chen, Minshan, Zhang, Rongxin, Zhou, Zhongguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805700
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.24568
_version_ 1783325837858177024
author Chen, Jinbin
Lu, Shixun
Zhang, Yaojun
Xu, Li
Chen, Jiancong
Wang, Juncheng
Chen, Minshan
Zhang, Rongxin
Zhou, Zhongguo
author_facet Chen, Jinbin
Lu, Shixun
Zhang, Yaojun
Xu, Li
Chen, Jiancong
Wang, Juncheng
Chen, Minshan
Zhang, Rongxin
Zhou, Zhongguo
author_sort Chen, Jinbin
collection PubMed
description Background: Sorafenib has been recommended as the standard therapy for advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the difference in overall survival (OS) between treatments with sorafenib combined with regional therapies versus sorafenib monotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with pulmonary oligometastases. Methods: The study retrospectively enrolled 95 consecutive patients who underwent sorafenib therapy. A combined group (CG) of 40 patients received regional therapy in addition to sorafenib, and a monotherapy group (MG) of 55 patients received only sorafenib. OS was the primary endpoint, and time to progression (TTP) was the secondary endpoint. Subgroup analysis was further performed to evaluate the differences between the two groups. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to overcome the bias. Results: Median OS was significantly longer in the CG than in the MG (18.37 vs. 7.13 months; P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified three baseline characteristics that were prognostic indicators of OS: macrovascular invasion, regional therapy, and alpha-fetoprotein. Median TTP was significantly longer in the CG than in the MG (2.93 vs. 2.23 months; P = 0.004). Further multivariate analysis showed alpha-fetoprotein, total bilirubin, and regional therapy as prognostic indicators of TTP. After propensity score matching, 34 paired patients constituted each group. Patients in the adjusted CG showed a longer OS and TTP than those in the adjusted MG (OS: 18.37 vs. 7.37 months, P = 0.015; TTP: 3.12 vs. 2.265 months, P = 0.009). Multivariate analysis showed that combining regional therapies was still a prognostic indicator of OS (P = 0.01) and TTP (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Sorafenib combined with regional therapies may be associated with prolonged OS and TTP in HCC patients with pulmonary oligometastases compared with sorafenib monotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5968762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59687622018-05-25 Sorafenib Monotherapy Versus Sorafenib Combined with Regional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis Chen, Jinbin Lu, Shixun Zhang, Yaojun Xu, Li Chen, Jiancong Wang, Juncheng Chen, Minshan Zhang, Rongxin Zhou, Zhongguo J Cancer Research Paper Background: Sorafenib has been recommended as the standard therapy for advanced HCC with extrahepatic metastasis. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the difference in overall survival (OS) between treatments with sorafenib combined with regional therapies versus sorafenib monotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with pulmonary oligometastases. Methods: The study retrospectively enrolled 95 consecutive patients who underwent sorafenib therapy. A combined group (CG) of 40 patients received regional therapy in addition to sorafenib, and a monotherapy group (MG) of 55 patients received only sorafenib. OS was the primary endpoint, and time to progression (TTP) was the secondary endpoint. Subgroup analysis was further performed to evaluate the differences between the two groups. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to overcome the bias. Results: Median OS was significantly longer in the CG than in the MG (18.37 vs. 7.13 months; P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified three baseline characteristics that were prognostic indicators of OS: macrovascular invasion, regional therapy, and alpha-fetoprotein. Median TTP was significantly longer in the CG than in the MG (2.93 vs. 2.23 months; P = 0.004). Further multivariate analysis showed alpha-fetoprotein, total bilirubin, and regional therapy as prognostic indicators of TTP. After propensity score matching, 34 paired patients constituted each group. Patients in the adjusted CG showed a longer OS and TTP than those in the adjusted MG (OS: 18.37 vs. 7.37 months, P = 0.015; TTP: 3.12 vs. 2.265 months, P = 0.009). Multivariate analysis showed that combining regional therapies was still a prognostic indicator of OS (P = 0.01) and TTP (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Sorafenib combined with regional therapies may be associated with prolonged OS and TTP in HCC patients with pulmonary oligometastases compared with sorafenib monotherapy. Ivyspring International Publisher 2018-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5968762/ /pubmed/29805700 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.24568 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Chen, Jinbin
Lu, Shixun
Zhang, Yaojun
Xu, Li
Chen, Jiancong
Wang, Juncheng
Chen, Minshan
Zhang, Rongxin
Zhou, Zhongguo
Sorafenib Monotherapy Versus Sorafenib Combined with Regional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis
title Sorafenib Monotherapy Versus Sorafenib Combined with Regional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis
title_full Sorafenib Monotherapy Versus Sorafenib Combined with Regional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis
title_fullStr Sorafenib Monotherapy Versus Sorafenib Combined with Regional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sorafenib Monotherapy Versus Sorafenib Combined with Regional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis
title_short Sorafenib Monotherapy Versus Sorafenib Combined with Regional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Pulmonary Oligometastases: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis
title_sort sorafenib monotherapy versus sorafenib combined with regional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with pulmonary oligometastases: a propensity score-matched analysis
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29805700
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.24568
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjinbin sorafenibmonotherapyversussorafenibcombinedwithregionaltherapiesforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithpulmonaryoligometastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT lushixun sorafenibmonotherapyversussorafenibcombinedwithregionaltherapiesforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithpulmonaryoligometastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT zhangyaojun sorafenibmonotherapyversussorafenibcombinedwithregionaltherapiesforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithpulmonaryoligometastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT xuli sorafenibmonotherapyversussorafenibcombinedwithregionaltherapiesforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithpulmonaryoligometastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT chenjiancong sorafenibmonotherapyversussorafenibcombinedwithregionaltherapiesforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithpulmonaryoligometastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT wangjuncheng sorafenibmonotherapyversussorafenibcombinedwithregionaltherapiesforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithpulmonaryoligometastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT chenminshan sorafenibmonotherapyversussorafenibcombinedwithregionaltherapiesforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithpulmonaryoligometastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT zhangrongxin sorafenibmonotherapyversussorafenibcombinedwithregionaltherapiesforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithpulmonaryoligometastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT zhouzhongguo sorafenibmonotherapyversussorafenibcombinedwithregionaltherapiesforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswithpulmonaryoligometastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis