Cargando…
Intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in South Africa: What can a scoping review tell us?
BACKGROUND: Intellectual disability (ID) is the most prevalent disability in the world. People with intellectual disability (PWID) frequently experience extreme violations of numerous human rights. Despite greater prevalence in South Africa than in high-income countries, most ID research currently c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850438 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v7i0.396 |
_version_ | 1783325859172581376 |
---|---|
author | Capri, Charlotte Abrahams, Lameze McKenzie, Judith Coetzee, Ockert Mkabile, Siyabulela Saptouw, Manuel Hooper, Andrew Smith, Peter Adnams, Colleen Swartz, Leslie |
author_facet | Capri, Charlotte Abrahams, Lameze McKenzie, Judith Coetzee, Ockert Mkabile, Siyabulela Saptouw, Manuel Hooper, Andrew Smith, Peter Adnams, Colleen Swartz, Leslie |
author_sort | Capri, Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intellectual disability (ID) is the most prevalent disability in the world. People with intellectual disability (PWID) frequently experience extreme violations of numerous human rights. Despite greater prevalence in South Africa than in high-income countries, most ID research currently comes from the Global North. This leaves us with few contextually sensitive studies to draw from to advance inclusive citizenship. OBJECTIVES: Our scoping review aims to investigate pertinent ID rights issues in South Africa, synthesise quantitative and qualitative studies, and provide a synopsis of available evidence on which to base future work. We aim to clarify key concepts, address gaps in the literature and identify opportunities for further research. METHOD: We followed strict eligibility criteria. Medical subject heading terms were entered into seven databases. Seven reviewers worked independently, two per paper. Quantitative and qualitative data extraction forms were designed. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and registered a protocol. An inductive approach enabled a thematic analysis of selected studies. RESULTS: By following PRISMA guidelines, 82 studies were assessed for eligibility of which 59 were included. Ten sub-themes were integrated into four main themes: the right not to be discriminated against, the right to psychological and bodily integrity, the right to accommodating services and challenges to rights implementation. CONCLUSION: People with intellectual disability face compound difficulties when trying to assert their constitutionally entitled rights. This ongoing project requires serious commitment and action. Statutory obligations to nurture every South African’s human rights naturally extend to PWID and their supporters who forge ahead in a disabling environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5968870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59688702018-05-30 Intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in South Africa: What can a scoping review tell us? Capri, Charlotte Abrahams, Lameze McKenzie, Judith Coetzee, Ockert Mkabile, Siyabulela Saptouw, Manuel Hooper, Andrew Smith, Peter Adnams, Colleen Swartz, Leslie Afr J Disabil Review Article BACKGROUND: Intellectual disability (ID) is the most prevalent disability in the world. People with intellectual disability (PWID) frequently experience extreme violations of numerous human rights. Despite greater prevalence in South Africa than in high-income countries, most ID research currently comes from the Global North. This leaves us with few contextually sensitive studies to draw from to advance inclusive citizenship. OBJECTIVES: Our scoping review aims to investigate pertinent ID rights issues in South Africa, synthesise quantitative and qualitative studies, and provide a synopsis of available evidence on which to base future work. We aim to clarify key concepts, address gaps in the literature and identify opportunities for further research. METHOD: We followed strict eligibility criteria. Medical subject heading terms were entered into seven databases. Seven reviewers worked independently, two per paper. Quantitative and qualitative data extraction forms were designed. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and registered a protocol. An inductive approach enabled a thematic analysis of selected studies. RESULTS: By following PRISMA guidelines, 82 studies were assessed for eligibility of which 59 were included. Ten sub-themes were integrated into four main themes: the right not to be discriminated against, the right to psychological and bodily integrity, the right to accommodating services and challenges to rights implementation. CONCLUSION: People with intellectual disability face compound difficulties when trying to assert their constitutionally entitled rights. This ongoing project requires serious commitment and action. Statutory obligations to nurture every South African’s human rights naturally extend to PWID and their supporters who forge ahead in a disabling environment. AOSIS 2018-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5968870/ /pubmed/29850438 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v7i0.396 Text en © 2018. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Capri, Charlotte Abrahams, Lameze McKenzie, Judith Coetzee, Ockert Mkabile, Siyabulela Saptouw, Manuel Hooper, Andrew Smith, Peter Adnams, Colleen Swartz, Leslie Intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in South Africa: What can a scoping review tell us? |
title | Intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in South Africa: What can a scoping review tell us? |
title_full | Intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in South Africa: What can a scoping review tell us? |
title_fullStr | Intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in South Africa: What can a scoping review tell us? |
title_full_unstemmed | Intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in South Africa: What can a scoping review tell us? |
title_short | Intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in South Africa: What can a scoping review tell us? |
title_sort | intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in south africa: what can a scoping review tell us? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850438 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v7i0.396 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT capricharlotte intellectualdisabilityrightsandinclusivecitizenshipinsouthafricawhatcanascopingreviewtellus AT abrahamslameze intellectualdisabilityrightsandinclusivecitizenshipinsouthafricawhatcanascopingreviewtellus AT mckenziejudith intellectualdisabilityrightsandinclusivecitizenshipinsouthafricawhatcanascopingreviewtellus AT coetzeeockert intellectualdisabilityrightsandinclusivecitizenshipinsouthafricawhatcanascopingreviewtellus AT mkabilesiyabulela intellectualdisabilityrightsandinclusivecitizenshipinsouthafricawhatcanascopingreviewtellus AT saptouwmanuel intellectualdisabilityrightsandinclusivecitizenshipinsouthafricawhatcanascopingreviewtellus AT hooperandrew intellectualdisabilityrightsandinclusivecitizenshipinsouthafricawhatcanascopingreviewtellus AT smithpeter intellectualdisabilityrightsandinclusivecitizenshipinsouthafricawhatcanascopingreviewtellus AT adnamscolleen intellectualdisabilityrightsandinclusivecitizenshipinsouthafricawhatcanascopingreviewtellus AT swartzleslie intellectualdisabilityrightsandinclusivecitizenshipinsouthafricawhatcanascopingreviewtellus |