Cargando…
Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups
This study profiled junior college football players. Sixty-two subjects completed vertical jump (VJ; height and peak power), standing broad jump (SBJ), 36.58 m sprint, pro-agility shuttle, three-cone drill, and maximal-repetition bench press and front squat. The sample included 2 quarterbacks (QB),...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910291 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports4030041 |
_version_ | 1783325862210306048 |
---|---|
author | Lockie, Robert G. Lazar, Adrina Orjalo, Ashley J. Davis, DeShaun L. Moreno, Matthew R. Risso, Fabrice G. Hank, Matthew E. Stone, Randal C. Mosich, Nicholas W. |
author_facet | Lockie, Robert G. Lazar, Adrina Orjalo, Ashley J. Davis, DeShaun L. Moreno, Matthew R. Risso, Fabrice G. Hank, Matthew E. Stone, Randal C. Mosich, Nicholas W. |
author_sort | Lockie, Robert G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study profiled junior college football players. Sixty-two subjects completed vertical jump (VJ; height and peak power), standing broad jump (SBJ), 36.58 m sprint, pro-agility shuttle, three-cone drill, and maximal-repetition bench press and front squat. The sample included 2 quarterbacks (QB), 7 running backs (RB), 13 wide receivers (WR), 1 tight end (TE), 18 defensive backs (DB), 8 linebackers (LB), and 13 offensive and defensive linemen (LM). To investigate positional differences, subjects were split into skill (SK; WR, DB), big skill (BSK; QB, RB, TE, LB), and LM groups. A one-way ANOVA determined between-group differences. LM were taller and heavier than SK and BSK players. The SK and BSK groups were faster than LM in the 0–36.58 m sprint, pro-agility shuttle, and three-cone drill (p ≤ 0.009). The SK group had greater VJ height and SBJ distance; LM generated greater VJ peak power (p ≤ 0.022). There were no between-group differences in the strength endurance tests. Compared to Division I data, junior college players were smaller, slower, and performed worse in jump tests. Positional differences in junior college football are typical to that of established research. Junior college players should attempt to increase body mass, and improve speed and lower-body power. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5968883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59688832018-06-13 Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups Lockie, Robert G. Lazar, Adrina Orjalo, Ashley J. Davis, DeShaun L. Moreno, Matthew R. Risso, Fabrice G. Hank, Matthew E. Stone, Randal C. Mosich, Nicholas W. Sports (Basel) Article This study profiled junior college football players. Sixty-two subjects completed vertical jump (VJ; height and peak power), standing broad jump (SBJ), 36.58 m sprint, pro-agility shuttle, three-cone drill, and maximal-repetition bench press and front squat. The sample included 2 quarterbacks (QB), 7 running backs (RB), 13 wide receivers (WR), 1 tight end (TE), 18 defensive backs (DB), 8 linebackers (LB), and 13 offensive and defensive linemen (LM). To investigate positional differences, subjects were split into skill (SK; WR, DB), big skill (BSK; QB, RB, TE, LB), and LM groups. A one-way ANOVA determined between-group differences. LM were taller and heavier than SK and BSK players. The SK and BSK groups were faster than LM in the 0–36.58 m sprint, pro-agility shuttle, and three-cone drill (p ≤ 0.009). The SK group had greater VJ height and SBJ distance; LM generated greater VJ peak power (p ≤ 0.022). There were no between-group differences in the strength endurance tests. Compared to Division I data, junior college players were smaller, slower, and performed worse in jump tests. Positional differences in junior college football are typical to that of established research. Junior college players should attempt to increase body mass, and improve speed and lower-body power. MDPI 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5968883/ /pubmed/29910291 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports4030041 Text en © 2016 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lockie, Robert G. Lazar, Adrina Orjalo, Ashley J. Davis, DeShaun L. Moreno, Matthew R. Risso, Fabrice G. Hank, Matthew E. Stone, Randal C. Mosich, Nicholas W. Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups |
title | Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups |
title_full | Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups |
title_fullStr | Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups |
title_full_unstemmed | Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups |
title_short | Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups |
title_sort | profiling of junior college football players and differences between position groups |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910291 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports4030041 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lockierobertg profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups AT lazaradrina profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups AT orjaloashleyj profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups AT davisdeshaunl profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups AT morenomatthewr profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups AT rissofabriceg profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups AT hankmatthewe profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups AT stonerandalc profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups AT mosichnicholasw profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups |