Cargando…

Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups

This study profiled junior college football players. Sixty-two subjects completed vertical jump (VJ; height and peak power), standing broad jump (SBJ), 36.58 m sprint, pro-agility shuttle, three-cone drill, and maximal-repetition bench press and front squat. The sample included 2 quarterbacks (QB),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lockie, Robert G., Lazar, Adrina, Orjalo, Ashley J., Davis, DeShaun L., Moreno, Matthew R., Risso, Fabrice G., Hank, Matthew E., Stone, Randal C., Mosich, Nicholas W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910291
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports4030041
_version_ 1783325862210306048
author Lockie, Robert G.
Lazar, Adrina
Orjalo, Ashley J.
Davis, DeShaun L.
Moreno, Matthew R.
Risso, Fabrice G.
Hank, Matthew E.
Stone, Randal C.
Mosich, Nicholas W.
author_facet Lockie, Robert G.
Lazar, Adrina
Orjalo, Ashley J.
Davis, DeShaun L.
Moreno, Matthew R.
Risso, Fabrice G.
Hank, Matthew E.
Stone, Randal C.
Mosich, Nicholas W.
author_sort Lockie, Robert G.
collection PubMed
description This study profiled junior college football players. Sixty-two subjects completed vertical jump (VJ; height and peak power), standing broad jump (SBJ), 36.58 m sprint, pro-agility shuttle, three-cone drill, and maximal-repetition bench press and front squat. The sample included 2 quarterbacks (QB), 7 running backs (RB), 13 wide receivers (WR), 1 tight end (TE), 18 defensive backs (DB), 8 linebackers (LB), and 13 offensive and defensive linemen (LM). To investigate positional differences, subjects were split into skill (SK; WR, DB), big skill (BSK; QB, RB, TE, LB), and LM groups. A one-way ANOVA determined between-group differences. LM were taller and heavier than SK and BSK players. The SK and BSK groups were faster than LM in the 0–36.58 m sprint, pro-agility shuttle, and three-cone drill (p ≤ 0.009). The SK group had greater VJ height and SBJ distance; LM generated greater VJ peak power (p ≤ 0.022). There were no between-group differences in the strength endurance tests. Compared to Division I data, junior college players were smaller, slower, and performed worse in jump tests. Positional differences in junior college football are typical to that of established research. Junior college players should attempt to increase body mass, and improve speed and lower-body power.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5968883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59688832018-06-13 Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups Lockie, Robert G. Lazar, Adrina Orjalo, Ashley J. Davis, DeShaun L. Moreno, Matthew R. Risso, Fabrice G. Hank, Matthew E. Stone, Randal C. Mosich, Nicholas W. Sports (Basel) Article This study profiled junior college football players. Sixty-two subjects completed vertical jump (VJ; height and peak power), standing broad jump (SBJ), 36.58 m sprint, pro-agility shuttle, three-cone drill, and maximal-repetition bench press and front squat. The sample included 2 quarterbacks (QB), 7 running backs (RB), 13 wide receivers (WR), 1 tight end (TE), 18 defensive backs (DB), 8 linebackers (LB), and 13 offensive and defensive linemen (LM). To investigate positional differences, subjects were split into skill (SK; WR, DB), big skill (BSK; QB, RB, TE, LB), and LM groups. A one-way ANOVA determined between-group differences. LM were taller and heavier than SK and BSK players. The SK and BSK groups were faster than LM in the 0–36.58 m sprint, pro-agility shuttle, and three-cone drill (p ≤ 0.009). The SK group had greater VJ height and SBJ distance; LM generated greater VJ peak power (p ≤ 0.022). There were no between-group differences in the strength endurance tests. Compared to Division I data, junior college players were smaller, slower, and performed worse in jump tests. Positional differences in junior college football are typical to that of established research. Junior college players should attempt to increase body mass, and improve speed and lower-body power. MDPI 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5968883/ /pubmed/29910291 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports4030041 Text en © 2016 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lockie, Robert G.
Lazar, Adrina
Orjalo, Ashley J.
Davis, DeShaun L.
Moreno, Matthew R.
Risso, Fabrice G.
Hank, Matthew E.
Stone, Randal C.
Mosich, Nicholas W.
Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups
title Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups
title_full Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups
title_fullStr Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups
title_full_unstemmed Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups
title_short Profiling of Junior College Football Players and Differences between Position Groups
title_sort profiling of junior college football players and differences between position groups
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910291
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports4030041
work_keys_str_mv AT lockierobertg profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups
AT lazaradrina profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups
AT orjaloashleyj profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups
AT davisdeshaunl profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups
AT morenomatthewr profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups
AT rissofabriceg profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups
AT hankmatthewe profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups
AT stonerandalc profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups
AT mosichnicholasw profilingofjuniorcollegefootballplayersanddifferencesbetweenpositiongroups