Cargando…

An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press

The close-grip bench press (CGBP) is a variation of the traditional bench press (TBP) that uses a narrower grip (~95% of biacromial distance (BAD)) and has potential application for athletes performing explosive arm actions from positions where the hands are held close to the torso. Limited research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lockie, Robert G., Callaghan, Samuel J., Moreno, Matthew R., Risso, Fabrice G., Liu, Tricia M., Stage, Alyssa A., Birmingham-Babauta, Samantha A., Stokes, John J., Giuliano, Dominic V., Lazar, Adrina, Davis, DeShaun L., Orjalo, Ashley J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910406
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5030046
_version_ 1783325879651270656
author Lockie, Robert G.
Callaghan, Samuel J.
Moreno, Matthew R.
Risso, Fabrice G.
Liu, Tricia M.
Stage, Alyssa A.
Birmingham-Babauta, Samantha A.
Stokes, John J.
Giuliano, Dominic V.
Lazar, Adrina
Davis, DeShaun L.
Orjalo, Ashley J.
author_facet Lockie, Robert G.
Callaghan, Samuel J.
Moreno, Matthew R.
Risso, Fabrice G.
Liu, Tricia M.
Stage, Alyssa A.
Birmingham-Babauta, Samantha A.
Stokes, John J.
Giuliano, Dominic V.
Lazar, Adrina
Davis, DeShaun L.
Orjalo, Ashley J.
author_sort Lockie, Robert G.
collection PubMed
description The close-grip bench press (CGBP) is a variation of the traditional bench press (TBP) that uses a narrower grip (~95% of biacromial distance (BAD)) and has potential application for athletes performing explosive arm actions from positions where the hands are held close to the torso. Limited research has investigated CGBP mechanics compared to the TBP. Twenty-seven resistance-trained individuals completed a one-repetition maximum TBP and CGBP. The TBP was performed with the preferred grip; the CGBP with a grip width of 95% BAD. A linear position transducer measured lift distance and duration; peak and mean power, velocity, and force; distance and time when peak power occurred; and work. Pre-sticking region (PrSR), sticking region, and post-sticking region distance and duration for each lift was measured. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to derive differences between TBP and CGBP mechanics (p < 0.01); effect sizes (d) were also calculated. A greater load was lifted in the TBP, thus mean force was greater (d = 0.16–0.17). Peak power and velocity were higher in the CGBP, which had a longer PrSR distance (d = 0.49–1.32). The CGBP could emphasize power for athletes that initiate explosive upper-body actions with the hands positioned close to the torso.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5968970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59689702018-06-13 An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press Lockie, Robert G. Callaghan, Samuel J. Moreno, Matthew R. Risso, Fabrice G. Liu, Tricia M. Stage, Alyssa A. Birmingham-Babauta, Samantha A. Stokes, John J. Giuliano, Dominic V. Lazar, Adrina Davis, DeShaun L. Orjalo, Ashley J. Sports (Basel) Article The close-grip bench press (CGBP) is a variation of the traditional bench press (TBP) that uses a narrower grip (~95% of biacromial distance (BAD)) and has potential application for athletes performing explosive arm actions from positions where the hands are held close to the torso. Limited research has investigated CGBP mechanics compared to the TBP. Twenty-seven resistance-trained individuals completed a one-repetition maximum TBP and CGBP. The TBP was performed with the preferred grip; the CGBP with a grip width of 95% BAD. A linear position transducer measured lift distance and duration; peak and mean power, velocity, and force; distance and time when peak power occurred; and work. Pre-sticking region (PrSR), sticking region, and post-sticking region distance and duration for each lift was measured. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to derive differences between TBP and CGBP mechanics (p < 0.01); effect sizes (d) were also calculated. A greater load was lifted in the TBP, thus mean force was greater (d = 0.16–0.17). Peak power and velocity were higher in the CGBP, which had a longer PrSR distance (d = 0.49–1.32). The CGBP could emphasize power for athletes that initiate explosive upper-body actions with the hands positioned close to the torso. MDPI 2017-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5968970/ /pubmed/29910406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5030046 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lockie, Robert G.
Callaghan, Samuel J.
Moreno, Matthew R.
Risso, Fabrice G.
Liu, Tricia M.
Stage, Alyssa A.
Birmingham-Babauta, Samantha A.
Stokes, John J.
Giuliano, Dominic V.
Lazar, Adrina
Davis, DeShaun L.
Orjalo, Ashley J.
An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press
title An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press
title_full An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press
title_fullStr An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press
title_full_unstemmed An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press
title_short An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press
title_sort investigation of the mechanics and sticking region of a one-repetition maximum close-grip bench press versus the traditional bench press
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910406
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5030046
work_keys_str_mv AT lockierobertg aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT callaghansamuelj aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT morenomatthewr aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT rissofabriceg aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT liutriciam aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT stagealyssaa aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT birminghambabautasamanthaa aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT stokesjohnj aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT giulianodominicv aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT lazaradrina aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT davisdeshaunl aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT orjaloashleyj aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT lockierobertg investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT callaghansamuelj investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT morenomatthewr investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT rissofabriceg investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT liutriciam investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT stagealyssaa investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT birminghambabautasamanthaa investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT stokesjohnj investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT giulianodominicv investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT lazaradrina investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT davisdeshaunl investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress
AT orjaloashleyj investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress