Cargando…
An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press
The close-grip bench press (CGBP) is a variation of the traditional bench press (TBP) that uses a narrower grip (~95% of biacromial distance (BAD)) and has potential application for athletes performing explosive arm actions from positions where the hands are held close to the torso. Limited research...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5030046 |
_version_ | 1783325879651270656 |
---|---|
author | Lockie, Robert G. Callaghan, Samuel J. Moreno, Matthew R. Risso, Fabrice G. Liu, Tricia M. Stage, Alyssa A. Birmingham-Babauta, Samantha A. Stokes, John J. Giuliano, Dominic V. Lazar, Adrina Davis, DeShaun L. Orjalo, Ashley J. |
author_facet | Lockie, Robert G. Callaghan, Samuel J. Moreno, Matthew R. Risso, Fabrice G. Liu, Tricia M. Stage, Alyssa A. Birmingham-Babauta, Samantha A. Stokes, John J. Giuliano, Dominic V. Lazar, Adrina Davis, DeShaun L. Orjalo, Ashley J. |
author_sort | Lockie, Robert G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The close-grip bench press (CGBP) is a variation of the traditional bench press (TBP) that uses a narrower grip (~95% of biacromial distance (BAD)) and has potential application for athletes performing explosive arm actions from positions where the hands are held close to the torso. Limited research has investigated CGBP mechanics compared to the TBP. Twenty-seven resistance-trained individuals completed a one-repetition maximum TBP and CGBP. The TBP was performed with the preferred grip; the CGBP with a grip width of 95% BAD. A linear position transducer measured lift distance and duration; peak and mean power, velocity, and force; distance and time when peak power occurred; and work. Pre-sticking region (PrSR), sticking region, and post-sticking region distance and duration for each lift was measured. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to derive differences between TBP and CGBP mechanics (p < 0.01); effect sizes (d) were also calculated. A greater load was lifted in the TBP, thus mean force was greater (d = 0.16–0.17). Peak power and velocity were higher in the CGBP, which had a longer PrSR distance (d = 0.49–1.32). The CGBP could emphasize power for athletes that initiate explosive upper-body actions with the hands positioned close to the torso. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5968970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59689702018-06-13 An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press Lockie, Robert G. Callaghan, Samuel J. Moreno, Matthew R. Risso, Fabrice G. Liu, Tricia M. Stage, Alyssa A. Birmingham-Babauta, Samantha A. Stokes, John J. Giuliano, Dominic V. Lazar, Adrina Davis, DeShaun L. Orjalo, Ashley J. Sports (Basel) Article The close-grip bench press (CGBP) is a variation of the traditional bench press (TBP) that uses a narrower grip (~95% of biacromial distance (BAD)) and has potential application for athletes performing explosive arm actions from positions where the hands are held close to the torso. Limited research has investigated CGBP mechanics compared to the TBP. Twenty-seven resistance-trained individuals completed a one-repetition maximum TBP and CGBP. The TBP was performed with the preferred grip; the CGBP with a grip width of 95% BAD. A linear position transducer measured lift distance and duration; peak and mean power, velocity, and force; distance and time when peak power occurred; and work. Pre-sticking region (PrSR), sticking region, and post-sticking region distance and duration for each lift was measured. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to derive differences between TBP and CGBP mechanics (p < 0.01); effect sizes (d) were also calculated. A greater load was lifted in the TBP, thus mean force was greater (d = 0.16–0.17). Peak power and velocity were higher in the CGBP, which had a longer PrSR distance (d = 0.49–1.32). The CGBP could emphasize power for athletes that initiate explosive upper-body actions with the hands positioned close to the torso. MDPI 2017-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5968970/ /pubmed/29910406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5030046 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lockie, Robert G. Callaghan, Samuel J. Moreno, Matthew R. Risso, Fabrice G. Liu, Tricia M. Stage, Alyssa A. Birmingham-Babauta, Samantha A. Stokes, John J. Giuliano, Dominic V. Lazar, Adrina Davis, DeShaun L. Orjalo, Ashley J. An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press |
title | An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press |
title_full | An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press |
title_fullStr | An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press |
title_full_unstemmed | An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press |
title_short | An Investigation of the Mechanics and Sticking Region of a One-Repetition Maximum Close-Grip Bench Press versus the Traditional Bench Press |
title_sort | investigation of the mechanics and sticking region of a one-repetition maximum close-grip bench press versus the traditional bench press |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5968970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910406 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5030046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lockierobertg aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT callaghansamuelj aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT morenomatthewr aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT rissofabriceg aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT liutriciam aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT stagealyssaa aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT birminghambabautasamanthaa aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT stokesjohnj aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT giulianodominicv aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT lazaradrina aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT davisdeshaunl aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT orjaloashleyj aninvestigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT lockierobertg investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT callaghansamuelj investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT morenomatthewr investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT rissofabriceg investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT liutriciam investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT stagealyssaa investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT birminghambabautasamanthaa investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT stokesjohnj investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT giulianodominicv investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT lazaradrina investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT davisdeshaunl investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress AT orjaloashleyj investigationofthemechanicsandstickingregionofaonerepetitionmaximumclosegripbenchpressversusthetraditionalbenchpress |