Cargando…
Functional Movement Screen Scores and Physical Performance among Youth Elite Soccer Players
This study had two main objectives: (1) to determine if differences in Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores exist between two levels of competition; and (2) to analyze the association between FMS individual and overall scores and physical performance variables of lower-limb power (jumps), repeate...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5010016 |
Sumario: | This study had two main objectives: (1) to determine if differences in Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores exist between two levels of competition; and (2) to analyze the association between FMS individual and overall scores and physical performance variables of lower-limb power (jumps), repeated sprint ability and shot speed. Twenty-two Under 16 (U16) and twenty-six Under 19 (U19) national competitive soccer players participated in this study. All participants were evaluated according to anthropometrics, FMS, jump performance, instep kick speed and anaerobic performance. There were no significant differences in the individual FMS scores between competitive levels. There were significant negative correlations between hurdle step (right) and Running-based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) power average ([Formula: see text] = −0.293; p = 0.043) and RAST fatigue index (RAST FatIndex) ([Formula: see text] = −0.340; p = 0.018). The hurdle step (left) had a significant negative correlation to squat jump (SJ) ([Formula: see text] = −0.369; p = 0.012). Rotary stability had a significant negative correlation to RAST fatigue index (Right: [Formula: see text] = −0.311; p = 0.032. Left: [Formula: see text] = −0.400; p = 0.005). The results suggest that individual FMS scores may be better discriminants of performance than FMS total score and established minimal association between FMS scores and physical variables. Based on that, FMS may be suitable for the purposes of determining physical function but not for discriminating physical performance. |
---|