Cargando…

Comparison of the Relationship between Lying and Standing Ultrasonography Measures of Muscle Morphology with Isometric and Dynamic Force Production Capabilities

The purpose of the current study was (1) to examine the differences between standing and lying measures of vastus lateralis (VL), muscle thickness (MT), pennation angle (PA), and cross-sectional area (CSA) using ultrasonography; and (2) to explore the relationships between lying and standing measure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagle, John P., Carroll, Kevin M., Cunanan, Aaron J., Taber, Christopher B., Wetmore, Alexander, Bingham, Garett E., DeWeese, Brad H., Sato, Kimitake, Stuart, Charles A., Stone, Michael H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910448
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5040088
_version_ 1783325891015737344
author Wagle, John P.
Carroll, Kevin M.
Cunanan, Aaron J.
Taber, Christopher B.
Wetmore, Alexander
Bingham, Garett E.
DeWeese, Brad H.
Sato, Kimitake
Stuart, Charles A.
Stone, Michael H.
author_facet Wagle, John P.
Carroll, Kevin M.
Cunanan, Aaron J.
Taber, Christopher B.
Wetmore, Alexander
Bingham, Garett E.
DeWeese, Brad H.
Sato, Kimitake
Stuart, Charles A.
Stone, Michael H.
author_sort Wagle, John P.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the current study was (1) to examine the differences between standing and lying measures of vastus lateralis (VL), muscle thickness (MT), pennation angle (PA), and cross-sectional area (CSA) using ultrasonography; and (2) to explore the relationships between lying and standing measures with isometric and dynamic assessments of force production—specifically peak force, rate of force development (RFD), impulse, and one-repetition maximum back squat. Fourteen resistance-trained subjects (age = 26.8 ± 4.0 years, height = 181.4 ± 6.0 cm, body mass = 89.8 ± 10.7 kg, back squat to body mass ratio = 1.84 ± 0.34) agreed to participate. Lying and standing ultrasonography images of the right VL were collected following 48 hours of rest. Isometric squat assessments followed ultrasonography, and were performed on force platforms with data used to determine isometric peak force (IPF), as well as RFD and impulse at various time points. Forty-eight hours later, one-repetition maximum back squats were performed by each subject. Paired-samples t-tests revealed statistically significant differences between standing and lying measurements of MT (p < 0.001), PA (p < 0.001), and CSA (p ≤ 0.05), with standing values larger in all cases. Further, standing measures were correlated more strongly and abundantly to isometric and dynamic performance. These results suggest that if practitioners intend to gain insight into strength-power potential based on ultrasonography measurements, performing the measurement collection with the athlete in a standing posture may be preferred.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5969019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59690192018-06-13 Comparison of the Relationship between Lying and Standing Ultrasonography Measures of Muscle Morphology with Isometric and Dynamic Force Production Capabilities Wagle, John P. Carroll, Kevin M. Cunanan, Aaron J. Taber, Christopher B. Wetmore, Alexander Bingham, Garett E. DeWeese, Brad H. Sato, Kimitake Stuart, Charles A. Stone, Michael H. Sports (Basel) Article The purpose of the current study was (1) to examine the differences between standing and lying measures of vastus lateralis (VL), muscle thickness (MT), pennation angle (PA), and cross-sectional area (CSA) using ultrasonography; and (2) to explore the relationships between lying and standing measures with isometric and dynamic assessments of force production—specifically peak force, rate of force development (RFD), impulse, and one-repetition maximum back squat. Fourteen resistance-trained subjects (age = 26.8 ± 4.0 years, height = 181.4 ± 6.0 cm, body mass = 89.8 ± 10.7 kg, back squat to body mass ratio = 1.84 ± 0.34) agreed to participate. Lying and standing ultrasonography images of the right VL were collected following 48 hours of rest. Isometric squat assessments followed ultrasonography, and were performed on force platforms with data used to determine isometric peak force (IPF), as well as RFD and impulse at various time points. Forty-eight hours later, one-repetition maximum back squats were performed by each subject. Paired-samples t-tests revealed statistically significant differences between standing and lying measurements of MT (p < 0.001), PA (p < 0.001), and CSA (p ≤ 0.05), with standing values larger in all cases. Further, standing measures were correlated more strongly and abundantly to isometric and dynamic performance. These results suggest that if practitioners intend to gain insight into strength-power potential based on ultrasonography measurements, performing the measurement collection with the athlete in a standing posture may be preferred. MDPI 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5969019/ /pubmed/29910448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5040088 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wagle, John P.
Carroll, Kevin M.
Cunanan, Aaron J.
Taber, Christopher B.
Wetmore, Alexander
Bingham, Garett E.
DeWeese, Brad H.
Sato, Kimitake
Stuart, Charles A.
Stone, Michael H.
Comparison of the Relationship between Lying and Standing Ultrasonography Measures of Muscle Morphology with Isometric and Dynamic Force Production Capabilities
title Comparison of the Relationship between Lying and Standing Ultrasonography Measures of Muscle Morphology with Isometric and Dynamic Force Production Capabilities
title_full Comparison of the Relationship between Lying and Standing Ultrasonography Measures of Muscle Morphology with Isometric and Dynamic Force Production Capabilities
title_fullStr Comparison of the Relationship between Lying and Standing Ultrasonography Measures of Muscle Morphology with Isometric and Dynamic Force Production Capabilities
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Relationship between Lying and Standing Ultrasonography Measures of Muscle Morphology with Isometric and Dynamic Force Production Capabilities
title_short Comparison of the Relationship between Lying and Standing Ultrasonography Measures of Muscle Morphology with Isometric and Dynamic Force Production Capabilities
title_sort comparison of the relationship between lying and standing ultrasonography measures of muscle morphology with isometric and dynamic force production capabilities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910448
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5040088
work_keys_str_mv AT waglejohnp comparisonoftherelationshipbetweenlyingandstandingultrasonographymeasuresofmusclemorphologywithisometricanddynamicforceproductioncapabilities
AT carrollkevinm comparisonoftherelationshipbetweenlyingandstandingultrasonographymeasuresofmusclemorphologywithisometricanddynamicforceproductioncapabilities
AT cunananaaronj comparisonoftherelationshipbetweenlyingandstandingultrasonographymeasuresofmusclemorphologywithisometricanddynamicforceproductioncapabilities
AT taberchristopherb comparisonoftherelationshipbetweenlyingandstandingultrasonographymeasuresofmusclemorphologywithisometricanddynamicforceproductioncapabilities
AT wetmorealexander comparisonoftherelationshipbetweenlyingandstandingultrasonographymeasuresofmusclemorphologywithisometricanddynamicforceproductioncapabilities
AT binghamgarette comparisonoftherelationshipbetweenlyingandstandingultrasonographymeasuresofmusclemorphologywithisometricanddynamicforceproductioncapabilities
AT deweesebradh comparisonoftherelationshipbetweenlyingandstandingultrasonographymeasuresofmusclemorphologywithisometricanddynamicforceproductioncapabilities
AT satokimitake comparisonoftherelationshipbetweenlyingandstandingultrasonographymeasuresofmusclemorphologywithisometricanddynamicforceproductioncapabilities
AT stuartcharlesa comparisonoftherelationshipbetweenlyingandstandingultrasonographymeasuresofmusclemorphologywithisometricanddynamicforceproductioncapabilities
AT stonemichaelh comparisonoftherelationshipbetweenlyingandstandingultrasonographymeasuresofmusclemorphologywithisometricanddynamicforceproductioncapabilities