Cargando…

Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance

This study compared typical mechanical variables of interest obtained directly from barbell motion during deadlift performance with a conventional (CBD) and a hexagonal barbell (HBD). Eleven men, proficient with both deadlift variations, volunteered to participate in the study (age: 20.3 ± 0.6 years...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lake, Jason, Duncan, Freddie, Jackson, Matt, Naworynsky, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910442
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5040082
_version_ 1783325894011518976
author Lake, Jason
Duncan, Freddie
Jackson, Matt
Naworynsky, David
author_facet Lake, Jason
Duncan, Freddie
Jackson, Matt
Naworynsky, David
author_sort Lake, Jason
collection PubMed
description This study compared typical mechanical variables of interest obtained directly from barbell motion during deadlift performance with a conventional (CBD) and a hexagonal barbell (HBD). Eleven men, proficient with both deadlift variations, volunteered to participate in the study (age: 20.3 ± 0.6 years; height: 175.5 ± 8.5 m; mass: 88.7 ± 19.0 kg; CBD 1RM: 183 ± 22 kg; HBD 1RM: 194 ± 20 kg). During the first session, CBD and HBD 1RM was assessed; during the second session, they performed 3 sets of 1 CBD repetition with 90% 1RM; and in session three, they repeated this process with the HBD. Barbell displacement was recorded at 1000 Hz and mechanical parameters derived from this. Significantly heavier loads were lifted during HBD (6%, p = 0.003). There were no significant differences between barbell displacement (p = 0.216). However, HBD was performed significantly faster (15%, p = 0.012), HBD load was accelerated for significantly longer (36%, p = 0.004), and significantly larger mean forces underpinned this (6%, p < 0.001), with more work having been performed (7%, p < 0.001) at greater power outputs (28%, p < 0.001). The results of this study showed that heavier HBD loads can be lifted through the same range of motion faster, and that this load is accelerated for significantly longer. The strategies used to achieve these differences could have a significant effect on training outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5969032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59690322018-06-13 Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance Lake, Jason Duncan, Freddie Jackson, Matt Naworynsky, David Sports (Basel) Article This study compared typical mechanical variables of interest obtained directly from barbell motion during deadlift performance with a conventional (CBD) and a hexagonal barbell (HBD). Eleven men, proficient with both deadlift variations, volunteered to participate in the study (age: 20.3 ± 0.6 years; height: 175.5 ± 8.5 m; mass: 88.7 ± 19.0 kg; CBD 1RM: 183 ± 22 kg; HBD 1RM: 194 ± 20 kg). During the first session, CBD and HBD 1RM was assessed; during the second session, they performed 3 sets of 1 CBD repetition with 90% 1RM; and in session three, they repeated this process with the HBD. Barbell displacement was recorded at 1000 Hz and mechanical parameters derived from this. Significantly heavier loads were lifted during HBD (6%, p = 0.003). There were no significant differences between barbell displacement (p = 0.216). However, HBD was performed significantly faster (15%, p = 0.012), HBD load was accelerated for significantly longer (36%, p = 0.004), and significantly larger mean forces underpinned this (6%, p < 0.001), with more work having been performed (7%, p < 0.001) at greater power outputs (28%, p < 0.001). The results of this study showed that heavier HBD loads can be lifted through the same range of motion faster, and that this load is accelerated for significantly longer. The strategies used to achieve these differences could have a significant effect on training outcomes. MDPI 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5969032/ /pubmed/29910442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5040082 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lake, Jason
Duncan, Freddie
Jackson, Matt
Naworynsky, David
Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance
title Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance
title_full Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance
title_fullStr Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance
title_full_unstemmed Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance
title_short Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance
title_sort effect of a hexagonal barbell on the mechanical demand of deadlift performance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910442
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5040082
work_keys_str_mv AT lakejason effectofahexagonalbarbellonthemechanicaldemandofdeadliftperformance
AT duncanfreddie effectofahexagonalbarbellonthemechanicaldemandofdeadliftperformance
AT jacksonmatt effectofahexagonalbarbellonthemechanicaldemandofdeadliftperformance
AT naworynskydavid effectofahexagonalbarbellonthemechanicaldemandofdeadliftperformance