Cargando…
Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance
This study compared typical mechanical variables of interest obtained directly from barbell motion during deadlift performance with a conventional (CBD) and a hexagonal barbell (HBD). Eleven men, proficient with both deadlift variations, volunteered to participate in the study (age: 20.3 ± 0.6 years...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5040082 |
_version_ | 1783325894011518976 |
---|---|
author | Lake, Jason Duncan, Freddie Jackson, Matt Naworynsky, David |
author_facet | Lake, Jason Duncan, Freddie Jackson, Matt Naworynsky, David |
author_sort | Lake, Jason |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study compared typical mechanical variables of interest obtained directly from barbell motion during deadlift performance with a conventional (CBD) and a hexagonal barbell (HBD). Eleven men, proficient with both deadlift variations, volunteered to participate in the study (age: 20.3 ± 0.6 years; height: 175.5 ± 8.5 m; mass: 88.7 ± 19.0 kg; CBD 1RM: 183 ± 22 kg; HBD 1RM: 194 ± 20 kg). During the first session, CBD and HBD 1RM was assessed; during the second session, they performed 3 sets of 1 CBD repetition with 90% 1RM; and in session three, they repeated this process with the HBD. Barbell displacement was recorded at 1000 Hz and mechanical parameters derived from this. Significantly heavier loads were lifted during HBD (6%, p = 0.003). There were no significant differences between barbell displacement (p = 0.216). However, HBD was performed significantly faster (15%, p = 0.012), HBD load was accelerated for significantly longer (36%, p = 0.004), and significantly larger mean forces underpinned this (6%, p < 0.001), with more work having been performed (7%, p < 0.001) at greater power outputs (28%, p < 0.001). The results of this study showed that heavier HBD loads can be lifted through the same range of motion faster, and that this load is accelerated for significantly longer. The strategies used to achieve these differences could have a significant effect on training outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5969032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59690322018-06-13 Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance Lake, Jason Duncan, Freddie Jackson, Matt Naworynsky, David Sports (Basel) Article This study compared typical mechanical variables of interest obtained directly from barbell motion during deadlift performance with a conventional (CBD) and a hexagonal barbell (HBD). Eleven men, proficient with both deadlift variations, volunteered to participate in the study (age: 20.3 ± 0.6 years; height: 175.5 ± 8.5 m; mass: 88.7 ± 19.0 kg; CBD 1RM: 183 ± 22 kg; HBD 1RM: 194 ± 20 kg). During the first session, CBD and HBD 1RM was assessed; during the second session, they performed 3 sets of 1 CBD repetition with 90% 1RM; and in session three, they repeated this process with the HBD. Barbell displacement was recorded at 1000 Hz and mechanical parameters derived from this. Significantly heavier loads were lifted during HBD (6%, p = 0.003). There were no significant differences between barbell displacement (p = 0.216). However, HBD was performed significantly faster (15%, p = 0.012), HBD load was accelerated for significantly longer (36%, p = 0.004), and significantly larger mean forces underpinned this (6%, p < 0.001), with more work having been performed (7%, p < 0.001) at greater power outputs (28%, p < 0.001). The results of this study showed that heavier HBD loads can be lifted through the same range of motion faster, and that this load is accelerated for significantly longer. The strategies used to achieve these differences could have a significant effect on training outcomes. MDPI 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5969032/ /pubmed/29910442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5040082 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lake, Jason Duncan, Freddie Jackson, Matt Naworynsky, David Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance |
title | Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance |
title_full | Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance |
title_fullStr | Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance |
title_short | Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance |
title_sort | effect of a hexagonal barbell on the mechanical demand of deadlift performance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports5040082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lakejason effectofahexagonalbarbellonthemechanicaldemandofdeadliftperformance AT duncanfreddie effectofahexagonalbarbellonthemechanicaldemandofdeadliftperformance AT jacksonmatt effectofahexagonalbarbellonthemechanicaldemandofdeadliftperformance AT naworynskydavid effectofahexagonalbarbellonthemechanicaldemandofdeadliftperformance |