Cargando…

The impact of [Formula: see text] correction on MP2RAGE cortical T (1) and apparent cortical thickness at 7T

Determination of cortical thickness using MRI has often been criticized due to the presence of various error sources. Specifically, anatomical MRI relying on T(1) contrast may be unreliable due to spatially variable image contrast between gray matter (GM), white matter (WM) and cerebrospinal fluid (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haast, Roy A.M., Ivanov, Dimo, Uludağ, Kâmil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29457319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24011
Descripción
Sumario:Determination of cortical thickness using MRI has often been criticized due to the presence of various error sources. Specifically, anatomical MRI relying on T(1) contrast may be unreliable due to spatially variable image contrast between gray matter (GM), white matter (WM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Especially at ultra‐high field (≥ 7T) MRI, transmit and receive B(1)‐related image inhomogeneities can hamper correct classification of tissue types. In the current paper, we demonstrate that residual [Formula: see text] (transmit) inhomogeneities in the T(1)‐weighted and quantitative T(1) images using the MP2RAGE sequence at 7T lead to biases in cortical thickness measurements. As expected, post‐hoc correction for the spatially varying [Formula: see text] profile reduced the apparent T(1) values across the cortex in regions with low [Formula: see text] , and slightly increased apparent T(1) in regions with high [Formula: see text]. As a result, improved contrast‐to‐noise ratio both at the GM‐CSF and GM‐WM boundaries can be observed leading to more accurate surface reconstructions and cortical thickness estimates. Overall, the changes in cortical thickness ranged between a 5% decrease to a 70% increase after [Formula: see text] correction, reducing the variance of cortical thickness values across the brain dramatically and increasing the comparability with normative data. More specifically, the cortical thickness estimates increased in regions characterized by a strong decrease of apparent T(1) after [Formula: see text] correction in regions with low [Formula: see text] due to improved detection of the pial surface(.) The current results suggest that cortical thickness can be more accurately determined using MP2RAGE data at 7T if [Formula: see text] inhomogeneities are accounted for.