Cargando…

Supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: Exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries

Performance at identification lineup was assessed in eighty‐five 6‐ to 11‐year‐old typically developing children. Children viewed a live staged event involving 2 male actors, and were asked to identify the perpetrators from 2 separate lineups (one perpetrator‐present lineup and one perpetrator‐absen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilcock, Rachel, Crane, Laura, Hobson, Zoe, Nash, Gilly, Kirke‐Smith, Mimi, Henry, Lucy A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29861545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.3412
_version_ 1783325927014400000
author Wilcock, Rachel
Crane, Laura
Hobson, Zoe
Nash, Gilly
Kirke‐Smith, Mimi
Henry, Lucy A.
author_facet Wilcock, Rachel
Crane, Laura
Hobson, Zoe
Nash, Gilly
Kirke‐Smith, Mimi
Henry, Lucy A.
author_sort Wilcock, Rachel
collection PubMed
description Performance at identification lineup was assessed in eighty‐five 6‐ to 11‐year‐old typically developing children. Children viewed a live staged event involving 2 male actors, and were asked to identify the perpetrators from 2 separate lineups (one perpetrator‐present lineup and one perpetrator‐absent lineup). Half the children took part in lineups adapted by a registered intermediary (an impartial, trained professional who facilitates understanding and communication between vulnerable witnesses and members of the justice system), and half took part in “best‐practice” lineups, according to the current guidance for eyewitness identification in England and Wales. Children receiving assistance from a registered intermediary (relative to children who received best‐practice lineups) were more accurate in their identifications for perpetrator‐present lineups, and there was some evidence that they were also more accurate for perpetrator‐absent lineups. This provides the first empirical evidence for the effectiveness of registered intermediary support during identification lineups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5969220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59692202018-05-30 Supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: Exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries Wilcock, Rachel Crane, Laura Hobson, Zoe Nash, Gilly Kirke‐Smith, Mimi Henry, Lucy A. Appl Cogn Psychol Research Articles Performance at identification lineup was assessed in eighty‐five 6‐ to 11‐year‐old typically developing children. Children viewed a live staged event involving 2 male actors, and were asked to identify the perpetrators from 2 separate lineups (one perpetrator‐present lineup and one perpetrator‐absent lineup). Half the children took part in lineups adapted by a registered intermediary (an impartial, trained professional who facilitates understanding and communication between vulnerable witnesses and members of the justice system), and half took part in “best‐practice” lineups, according to the current guidance for eyewitness identification in England and Wales. Children receiving assistance from a registered intermediary (relative to children who received best‐practice lineups) were more accurate in their identifications for perpetrator‐present lineups, and there was some evidence that they were also more accurate for perpetrator‐absent lineups. This provides the first empirical evidence for the effectiveness of registered intermediary support during identification lineups. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-02 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5969220/ /pubmed/29861545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.3412 Text en © 2018 The Authors Applied Cognitive Psychology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wilcock, Rachel
Crane, Laura
Hobson, Zoe
Nash, Gilly
Kirke‐Smith, Mimi
Henry, Lucy A.
Supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: Exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries
title Supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: Exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries
title_full Supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: Exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries
title_fullStr Supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: Exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries
title_full_unstemmed Supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: Exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries
title_short Supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: Exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries
title_sort supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29861545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.3412
work_keys_str_mv AT wilcockrachel supportingchildwitnessesduringidentificationlineupsexploringtheeffectivenessofregisteredintermediaries
AT cranelaura supportingchildwitnessesduringidentificationlineupsexploringtheeffectivenessofregisteredintermediaries
AT hobsonzoe supportingchildwitnessesduringidentificationlineupsexploringtheeffectivenessofregisteredintermediaries
AT nashgilly supportingchildwitnessesduringidentificationlineupsexploringtheeffectivenessofregisteredintermediaries
AT kirkesmithmimi supportingchildwitnessesduringidentificationlineupsexploringtheeffectivenessofregisteredintermediaries
AT henrylucya supportingchildwitnessesduringidentificationlineupsexploringtheeffectivenessofregisteredintermediaries