Cargando…
Can rapid negative exclusion of blood cultures by a molecular method, enzyme template generation and amplification technique (Cognitor(®) Minus), aid antimicrobial stewardship?
OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial review is an important part of antimicrobial stewardship. A novel enzyme template generation and amplification technique (ETGA), the Cognitor(®) Minus (Momentum Bioscience, Long Hanborough, UK) test, has a 99.5% negative predictive value for bacteraemia and fungaemia. This...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28833759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12393 |
_version_ | 1783325930746281984 |
---|---|
author | Dryden, Matthew Sitjar, Agnes Gunning, Zoe Lewis, Sophie Healey, Richard Satchithananthan, Praneeth Parker, Natalie Keyser, Taryn Saeed, Kordo Bennett, Helen V. |
author_facet | Dryden, Matthew Sitjar, Agnes Gunning, Zoe Lewis, Sophie Healey, Richard Satchithananthan, Praneeth Parker, Natalie Keyser, Taryn Saeed, Kordo Bennett, Helen V. |
author_sort | Dryden, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial review is an important part of antimicrobial stewardship. A novel enzyme template generation and amplification technique (ETGA), the Cognitor(®) Minus (Momentum Bioscience, Long Hanborough, UK) test, has a 99.5% negative predictive value for bacteraemia and fungaemia. This observational study asked two questions: (1) Does a negative ETGA, indicating no bacteraemia or fungaemia, aid antimicrobial review within 48 h of admission; (2) In this real‐life clinical setting, does a negative ETGA mean no bacteraemia or fungaemia? METHODS: Consecutive blood cultures in patients with clinical infection were tested by ETGA. Negative results indicating an absence of bacteraemia or fungaemia were reviewed by the clinical infection team. Antibiotics were reviewed in these patients, and the role of the ETGA result in antibiotic change was recorded. Patients were followed up for a week. KEY FINDINGS: A total of 197 of 246 samples gave a negative result by ETGA. This led to a positive stewardship outcome (antimicrobials changed) in 145 (73.6%) and negative stewardship outcome (empirical antimicrobials continued) in 47 (23.9%). Of the positive stewardship outcomes, the ETGA result supported the decision not to start antimicrobials in 21 (10.7%) patients, to stop antimicrobials in 21 (10.7%), to switch from IV to oral antimicrobials in 103 (52.2%) or to discharge or leave the patient at home in 58 cases (29.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Enzyme template generation and amplification supports antimicrobial stewardship decisions and may have cost advantages in reducing unnecessary empirical antibiotics and antifungal agents and in discharging patients from hospital earlier. ETGA result was consistent with blood culture findings and gave an earlier negative result. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5969237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59692372018-05-30 Can rapid negative exclusion of blood cultures by a molecular method, enzyme template generation and amplification technique (Cognitor(®) Minus), aid antimicrobial stewardship? Dryden, Matthew Sitjar, Agnes Gunning, Zoe Lewis, Sophie Healey, Richard Satchithananthan, Praneeth Parker, Natalie Keyser, Taryn Saeed, Kordo Bennett, Helen V. Int J Pharm Pract Research Papers OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial review is an important part of antimicrobial stewardship. A novel enzyme template generation and amplification technique (ETGA), the Cognitor(®) Minus (Momentum Bioscience, Long Hanborough, UK) test, has a 99.5% negative predictive value for bacteraemia and fungaemia. This observational study asked two questions: (1) Does a negative ETGA, indicating no bacteraemia or fungaemia, aid antimicrobial review within 48 h of admission; (2) In this real‐life clinical setting, does a negative ETGA mean no bacteraemia or fungaemia? METHODS: Consecutive blood cultures in patients with clinical infection were tested by ETGA. Negative results indicating an absence of bacteraemia or fungaemia were reviewed by the clinical infection team. Antibiotics were reviewed in these patients, and the role of the ETGA result in antibiotic change was recorded. Patients were followed up for a week. KEY FINDINGS: A total of 197 of 246 samples gave a negative result by ETGA. This led to a positive stewardship outcome (antimicrobials changed) in 145 (73.6%) and negative stewardship outcome (empirical antimicrobials continued) in 47 (23.9%). Of the positive stewardship outcomes, the ETGA result supported the decision not to start antimicrobials in 21 (10.7%) patients, to stop antimicrobials in 21 (10.7%), to switch from IV to oral antimicrobials in 103 (52.2%) or to discharge or leave the patient at home in 58 cases (29.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Enzyme template generation and amplification supports antimicrobial stewardship decisions and may have cost advantages in reducing unnecessary empirical antibiotics and antifungal agents and in discharging patients from hospital earlier. ETGA result was consistent with blood culture findings and gave an earlier negative result. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-18 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5969237/ /pubmed/28833759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12393 Text en © 2017 The Authors. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Pharmaceutical Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Dryden, Matthew Sitjar, Agnes Gunning, Zoe Lewis, Sophie Healey, Richard Satchithananthan, Praneeth Parker, Natalie Keyser, Taryn Saeed, Kordo Bennett, Helen V. Can rapid negative exclusion of blood cultures by a molecular method, enzyme template generation and amplification technique (Cognitor(®) Minus), aid antimicrobial stewardship? |
title | Can rapid negative exclusion of blood cultures by a molecular method, enzyme template generation and amplification technique (Cognitor(®) Minus), aid antimicrobial stewardship? |
title_full | Can rapid negative exclusion of blood cultures by a molecular method, enzyme template generation and amplification technique (Cognitor(®) Minus), aid antimicrobial stewardship? |
title_fullStr | Can rapid negative exclusion of blood cultures by a molecular method, enzyme template generation and amplification technique (Cognitor(®) Minus), aid antimicrobial stewardship? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can rapid negative exclusion of blood cultures by a molecular method, enzyme template generation and amplification technique (Cognitor(®) Minus), aid antimicrobial stewardship? |
title_short | Can rapid negative exclusion of blood cultures by a molecular method, enzyme template generation and amplification technique (Cognitor(®) Minus), aid antimicrobial stewardship? |
title_sort | can rapid negative exclusion of blood cultures by a molecular method, enzyme template generation and amplification technique (cognitor(®) minus), aid antimicrobial stewardship? |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28833759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12393 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drydenmatthew canrapidnegativeexclusionofbloodculturesbyamolecularmethodenzymetemplategenerationandamplificationtechniquecognitorminusaidantimicrobialstewardship AT sitjaragnes canrapidnegativeexclusionofbloodculturesbyamolecularmethodenzymetemplategenerationandamplificationtechniquecognitorminusaidantimicrobialstewardship AT gunningzoe canrapidnegativeexclusionofbloodculturesbyamolecularmethodenzymetemplategenerationandamplificationtechniquecognitorminusaidantimicrobialstewardship AT lewissophie canrapidnegativeexclusionofbloodculturesbyamolecularmethodenzymetemplategenerationandamplificationtechniquecognitorminusaidantimicrobialstewardship AT healeyrichard canrapidnegativeexclusionofbloodculturesbyamolecularmethodenzymetemplategenerationandamplificationtechniquecognitorminusaidantimicrobialstewardship AT satchithananthanpraneeth canrapidnegativeexclusionofbloodculturesbyamolecularmethodenzymetemplategenerationandamplificationtechniquecognitorminusaidantimicrobialstewardship AT parkernatalie canrapidnegativeexclusionofbloodculturesbyamolecularmethodenzymetemplategenerationandamplificationtechniquecognitorminusaidantimicrobialstewardship AT keysertaryn canrapidnegativeexclusionofbloodculturesbyamolecularmethodenzymetemplategenerationandamplificationtechniquecognitorminusaidantimicrobialstewardship AT saeedkordo canrapidnegativeexclusionofbloodculturesbyamolecularmethodenzymetemplategenerationandamplificationtechniquecognitorminusaidantimicrobialstewardship AT bennetthelenv canrapidnegativeexclusionofbloodculturesbyamolecularmethodenzymetemplategenerationandamplificationtechniquecognitorminusaidantimicrobialstewardship |