Cargando…

Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes

Terrestrial primary productivity and carbon cycle impacts of droughts are commonly quantified using vapour pressure deficit (VPD) data and remotely sensed greenness, without accounting for soil moisture. However, soil moisture limitation is known to strongly affect plant physiology. Here, we investi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stocker, Benjamin D., Zscheischler, Jakob, Keenan, Trevor F., Prentice, I. Colin, Peñuelas, Josep, Seneviratne, Sonia I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29604221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15123
_version_ 1783325938593824768
author Stocker, Benjamin D.
Zscheischler, Jakob
Keenan, Trevor F.
Prentice, I. Colin
Peñuelas, Josep
Seneviratne, Sonia I.
author_facet Stocker, Benjamin D.
Zscheischler, Jakob
Keenan, Trevor F.
Prentice, I. Colin
Peñuelas, Josep
Seneviratne, Sonia I.
author_sort Stocker, Benjamin D.
collection PubMed
description Terrestrial primary productivity and carbon cycle impacts of droughts are commonly quantified using vapour pressure deficit (VPD) data and remotely sensed greenness, without accounting for soil moisture. However, soil moisture limitation is known to strongly affect plant physiology. Here, we investigate light use efficiency, the ratio of gross primary productivity (GPP) to absorbed light. We derive its fractional reduction due to soil moisture (fLUE), separated from VPD and greenness changes, using artificial neural networks trained on eddy covariance data, multiple soil moisture datasets and remotely sensed greenness. This reveals substantial impacts of soil moisture alone that reduce GPP by up to 40% at sites located in sub‐humid, semi‐arid or arid regions. For sites in relatively moist climates, we find, paradoxically, a muted fLUE response to drying soil, but reduced fLUE under wet conditions. fLUE identifies substantial drought impacts that are not captured when relying solely on VPD and greenness changes and, when seasonally recurring, are missed by traditional, anomaly‐based drought indices. Counter to common assumptions, fLUE reductions are largest in drought‐deciduous vegetation, including grasslands. Our results highlight the necessity to account for soil moisture limitation in terrestrial primary productivity data products, especially for drought‐related assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5969272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59692722018-05-30 Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes Stocker, Benjamin D. Zscheischler, Jakob Keenan, Trevor F. Prentice, I. Colin Peñuelas, Josep Seneviratne, Sonia I. New Phytol Research Terrestrial primary productivity and carbon cycle impacts of droughts are commonly quantified using vapour pressure deficit (VPD) data and remotely sensed greenness, without accounting for soil moisture. However, soil moisture limitation is known to strongly affect plant physiology. Here, we investigate light use efficiency, the ratio of gross primary productivity (GPP) to absorbed light. We derive its fractional reduction due to soil moisture (fLUE), separated from VPD and greenness changes, using artificial neural networks trained on eddy covariance data, multiple soil moisture datasets and remotely sensed greenness. This reveals substantial impacts of soil moisture alone that reduce GPP by up to 40% at sites located in sub‐humid, semi‐arid or arid regions. For sites in relatively moist climates, we find, paradoxically, a muted fLUE response to drying soil, but reduced fLUE under wet conditions. fLUE identifies substantial drought impacts that are not captured when relying solely on VPD and greenness changes and, when seasonally recurring, are missed by traditional, anomaly‐based drought indices. Counter to common assumptions, fLUE reductions are largest in drought‐deciduous vegetation, including grasslands. Our results highlight the necessity to account for soil moisture limitation in terrestrial primary productivity data products, especially for drought‐related assessments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-31 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5969272/ /pubmed/29604221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15123 Text en © 2018 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2018 New Phytologist Trust This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Stocker, Benjamin D.
Zscheischler, Jakob
Keenan, Trevor F.
Prentice, I. Colin
Peñuelas, Josep
Seneviratne, Sonia I.
Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes
title Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes
title_full Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes
title_fullStr Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes
title_short Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes
title_sort quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29604221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15123
work_keys_str_mv AT stockerbenjamind quantifyingsoilmoistureimpactsonlightuseefficiencyacrossbiomes
AT zscheischlerjakob quantifyingsoilmoistureimpactsonlightuseefficiencyacrossbiomes
AT keenantrevorf quantifyingsoilmoistureimpactsonlightuseefficiencyacrossbiomes
AT prenticeicolin quantifyingsoilmoistureimpactsonlightuseefficiencyacrossbiomes
AT penuelasjosep quantifyingsoilmoistureimpactsonlightuseefficiencyacrossbiomes
AT seneviratnesoniai quantifyingsoilmoistureimpactsonlightuseefficiencyacrossbiomes