Cargando…

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the stain removal efficacy of a sodium phytate dentifrice formulation

OBJECTIVES: Phytate is an organic, cyclic polyphosphate analogous to linear condensed polyphosphates used as stain removal agents. This study investigated stain removal efficacy of an experimental sodium phytate‐containing dentifrice compared to a reference dentifrice. METHODS: An experimental, mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milleman, Kimberly R., Creeth, Jonathan E., Burnett, Gary R., Milleman, Jeffery L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29411532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12355
_version_ 1783325940706705408
author Milleman, Kimberly R.
Creeth, Jonathan E.
Burnett, Gary R.
Milleman, Jeffery L.
author_facet Milleman, Kimberly R.
Creeth, Jonathan E.
Burnett, Gary R.
Milleman, Jeffery L.
author_sort Milleman, Kimberly R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Phytate is an organic, cyclic polyphosphate analogous to linear condensed polyphosphates used as stain removal agents. This study investigated stain removal efficacy of an experimental sodium phytate‐containing dentifrice compared to a reference dentifrice. METHODS: An experimental, moderate abrasivity (relative dentine abrasivity [RDA] ∼130) antisensitivity fluoride dentifrice containing sodium phytate (0.85% w/w as the hexasodium salt) (n = 111) was compared to a reference, marketed, low‐abrasivity (RDA ∼ 43), anti‐sensitivity fluoride dentifrice (n = 113), both containing 1150 ppm fluoride as sodium fluoride. Primary efficacy variables were between‐treatment differences in extrinsic dental stain of anterior teeth after 6 and 12 weeks' twice‐daily use, using Lobene stain index (MacPherson modification, MLSI) mean area (A) and intensity (I) scores. Comparisons included whole‐tooth and hard‐to‐reach areas (gingival, interproximal, body of lingual). RESULTS: At both 6‐ and 12‐week timepoints, MLSI (A × I) scores for total area and hard‐to‐reach areas for the experimental dentifrice were statistically significantly lower than baseline (P < .0001 for all). This was demonstrated for the reference dentifrice at 6 weeks only, for total, interproximal (P < .0001 for both), and body of lingual (P = .0395) scores. Compared with the reference, the experimental dentifrice had statistically significantly lower MLSI scores at both 6 and 12 weeks for all outcome variables including both total MLSI (A × I) and hard‐to reach areas (P < .0001 in all cases). Products were generally well‐tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between treatments were considered clinically differentiable. Sodium phytate may therefore be a suitable additive ingredient to improve tooth stain control performance within an otherwise conventional dentifrice formulation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Following 6 and 12 weeks brushing, clinically differentiable differences were shown in stain index scores with an experimental dentifrice containing sodium phytate compared to a reference dentifrice without sodium phytate. Sodium phytate may therefore be a suitable additive ingredient to improve tooth stain control performance within an otherwise conventional dentifrice formulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5969293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59692932018-05-30 A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the stain removal efficacy of a sodium phytate dentifrice formulation Milleman, Kimberly R. Creeth, Jonathan E. Burnett, Gary R. Milleman, Jeffery L. J Esthet Restor Dent Section on Color and Appearance in Dentistry edited by Dr. Rade Paravina OBJECTIVES: Phytate is an organic, cyclic polyphosphate analogous to linear condensed polyphosphates used as stain removal agents. This study investigated stain removal efficacy of an experimental sodium phytate‐containing dentifrice compared to a reference dentifrice. METHODS: An experimental, moderate abrasivity (relative dentine abrasivity [RDA] ∼130) antisensitivity fluoride dentifrice containing sodium phytate (0.85% w/w as the hexasodium salt) (n = 111) was compared to a reference, marketed, low‐abrasivity (RDA ∼ 43), anti‐sensitivity fluoride dentifrice (n = 113), both containing 1150 ppm fluoride as sodium fluoride. Primary efficacy variables were between‐treatment differences in extrinsic dental stain of anterior teeth after 6 and 12 weeks' twice‐daily use, using Lobene stain index (MacPherson modification, MLSI) mean area (A) and intensity (I) scores. Comparisons included whole‐tooth and hard‐to‐reach areas (gingival, interproximal, body of lingual). RESULTS: At both 6‐ and 12‐week timepoints, MLSI (A × I) scores for total area and hard‐to‐reach areas for the experimental dentifrice were statistically significantly lower than baseline (P < .0001 for all). This was demonstrated for the reference dentifrice at 6 weeks only, for total, interproximal (P < .0001 for both), and body of lingual (P = .0395) scores. Compared with the reference, the experimental dentifrice had statistically significantly lower MLSI scores at both 6 and 12 weeks for all outcome variables including both total MLSI (A × I) and hard‐to reach areas (P < .0001 in all cases). Products were generally well‐tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between treatments were considered clinically differentiable. Sodium phytate may therefore be a suitable additive ingredient to improve tooth stain control performance within an otherwise conventional dentifrice formulation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Following 6 and 12 weeks brushing, clinically differentiable differences were shown in stain index scores with an experimental dentifrice containing sodium phytate compared to a reference dentifrice without sodium phytate. Sodium phytate may therefore be a suitable additive ingredient to improve tooth stain control performance within an otherwise conventional dentifrice formulation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-07 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5969293/ /pubmed/29411532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12355 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Section on Color and Appearance in Dentistry edited by Dr. Rade Paravina
Milleman, Kimberly R.
Creeth, Jonathan E.
Burnett, Gary R.
Milleman, Jeffery L.
A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the stain removal efficacy of a sodium phytate dentifrice formulation
title A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the stain removal efficacy of a sodium phytate dentifrice formulation
title_full A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the stain removal efficacy of a sodium phytate dentifrice formulation
title_fullStr A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the stain removal efficacy of a sodium phytate dentifrice formulation
title_full_unstemmed A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the stain removal efficacy of a sodium phytate dentifrice formulation
title_short A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the stain removal efficacy of a sodium phytate dentifrice formulation
title_sort randomized clinical trial to evaluate the stain removal efficacy of a sodium phytate dentifrice formulation
topic Section on Color and Appearance in Dentistry edited by Dr. Rade Paravina
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29411532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12355
work_keys_str_mv AT millemankimberlyr arandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatethestainremovalefficacyofasodiumphytatedentifriceformulation
AT creethjonathane arandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatethestainremovalefficacyofasodiumphytatedentifriceformulation
AT burnettgaryr arandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatethestainremovalefficacyofasodiumphytatedentifriceformulation
AT millemanjefferyl arandomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatethestainremovalefficacyofasodiumphytatedentifriceformulation
AT millemankimberlyr randomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatethestainremovalefficacyofasodiumphytatedentifriceformulation
AT creethjonathane randomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatethestainremovalefficacyofasodiumphytatedentifriceformulation
AT burnettgaryr randomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatethestainremovalefficacyofasodiumphytatedentifriceformulation
AT millemanjefferyl randomizedclinicaltrialtoevaluatethestainremovalefficacyofasodiumphytatedentifriceformulation