Cargando…

A systematic review and meta‐analysis of venous thrombosis risk among users of combined oral contraception

BACKGROUND: Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing various progestogens could be associated with differential risks for venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative risks of VTE associated with the use of low‐dose (less than 50 μg ethinyl estradiol) COCs containing di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dragoman, Monica V., Tepper, Naomi K., Fu, Rongwei, Curtis, Kathryn M., Chou, Roger, Gaffield, Mary E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29388678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12455
_version_ 1783325943973019648
author Dragoman, Monica V.
Tepper, Naomi K.
Fu, Rongwei
Curtis, Kathryn M.
Chou, Roger
Gaffield, Mary E.
author_facet Dragoman, Monica V.
Tepper, Naomi K.
Fu, Rongwei
Curtis, Kathryn M.
Chou, Roger
Gaffield, Mary E.
author_sort Dragoman, Monica V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing various progestogens could be associated with differential risks for venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative risks of VTE associated with the use of low‐dose (less than 50 μg ethinyl estradiol) COCs containing different progestogens. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception through September 15, 2016, by combining search terms for oral contraception and venous thrombosis. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies reporting VTE risk estimates among healthy users of progestogen‐containing low‐dose COCs were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A random‐effects model was used to generate pooled adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals; subgroup and sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of monophasic‐COC use and study‐level characteristics. MAIN RESULTS: There were 22 articles included in the analysis. The use of COCs containing cyproterone acetate, desogestrel, drospirenone, or gestodene was associated with a significantly increased risk of VTE compared with the use of levonorgestrel‐containing COCs (pooled risk ratios 1.5–2.0). The analysis restricted to monophasic COC formulations with 30 μg of ethinyl estradiol yielded similar findings. After adjustment for study characteristics, the risk estimates were slightly attenuated. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the use of levonorgestrel‐containing COCs, the use of COCs containing other progestogens could be associated with a small increase in risk for VTE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5969307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59693072018-05-30 A systematic review and meta‐analysis of venous thrombosis risk among users of combined oral contraception Dragoman, Monica V. Tepper, Naomi K. Fu, Rongwei Curtis, Kathryn M. Chou, Roger Gaffield, Mary E. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Review Articles BACKGROUND: Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing various progestogens could be associated with differential risks for venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative risks of VTE associated with the use of low‐dose (less than 50 μg ethinyl estradiol) COCs containing different progestogens. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception through September 15, 2016, by combining search terms for oral contraception and venous thrombosis. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies reporting VTE risk estimates among healthy users of progestogen‐containing low‐dose COCs were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A random‐effects model was used to generate pooled adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals; subgroup and sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of monophasic‐COC use and study‐level characteristics. MAIN RESULTS: There were 22 articles included in the analysis. The use of COCs containing cyproterone acetate, desogestrel, drospirenone, or gestodene was associated with a significantly increased risk of VTE compared with the use of levonorgestrel‐containing COCs (pooled risk ratios 1.5–2.0). The analysis restricted to monophasic COC formulations with 30 μg of ethinyl estradiol yielded similar findings. After adjustment for study characteristics, the risk estimates were slightly attenuated. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the use of levonorgestrel‐containing COCs, the use of COCs containing other progestogens could be associated with a small increase in risk for VTE. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-22 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5969307/ /pubmed/29388678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12455 Text en © 2018 World Health Organization; licensed by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or the article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s URL.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Dragoman, Monica V.
Tepper, Naomi K.
Fu, Rongwei
Curtis, Kathryn M.
Chou, Roger
Gaffield, Mary E.
A systematic review and meta‐analysis of venous thrombosis risk among users of combined oral contraception
title A systematic review and meta‐analysis of venous thrombosis risk among users of combined oral contraception
title_full A systematic review and meta‐analysis of venous thrombosis risk among users of combined oral contraception
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta‐analysis of venous thrombosis risk among users of combined oral contraception
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta‐analysis of venous thrombosis risk among users of combined oral contraception
title_short A systematic review and meta‐analysis of venous thrombosis risk among users of combined oral contraception
title_sort systematic review and meta‐analysis of venous thrombosis risk among users of combined oral contraception
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29388678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12455
work_keys_str_mv AT dragomanmonicav asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvenousthrombosisriskamongusersofcombinedoralcontraception
AT teppernaomik asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvenousthrombosisriskamongusersofcombinedoralcontraception
AT furongwei asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvenousthrombosisriskamongusersofcombinedoralcontraception
AT curtiskathrynm asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvenousthrombosisriskamongusersofcombinedoralcontraception
AT chouroger asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvenousthrombosisriskamongusersofcombinedoralcontraception
AT gaffieldmarye asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvenousthrombosisriskamongusersofcombinedoralcontraception
AT dragomanmonicav systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvenousthrombosisriskamongusersofcombinedoralcontraception
AT teppernaomik systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvenousthrombosisriskamongusersofcombinedoralcontraception
AT furongwei systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvenousthrombosisriskamongusersofcombinedoralcontraception
AT curtiskathrynm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvenousthrombosisriskamongusersofcombinedoralcontraception
AT chouroger systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvenousthrombosisriskamongusersofcombinedoralcontraception
AT gaffieldmarye systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvenousthrombosisriskamongusersofcombinedoralcontraception