Cargando…
Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes
Public engagement with science (PES) is an emerging outreach method that builds trust between scientists and public audiences by encouraging two-way conversations and mutual learning about science content and societal values. Building with Biology, a PES initiative focused on synthetic biology, dist...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Microbiology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29904531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1434 |
_version_ | 1783325965064077312 |
---|---|
author | Todd, Katie Haupt, Gretchen Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz Pfeifle, Sarah |
author_facet | Todd, Katie Haupt, Gretchen Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz Pfeifle, Sarah |
author_sort | Todd, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Public engagement with science (PES) is an emerging outreach method that builds trust between scientists and public audiences by encouraging two-way conversations and mutual learning about science content and societal values. Building with Biology, a PES initiative focused on synthetic biology, distributed 182 kits with two types of products to informal science education institutions across the United States: 1) hands-on activities for public events, and 2) materials to run public dialogue programs, called forums. This article compares the interest levels, perceived value, and learning of public participants at these events and forums. Forum participants reported slightly higher levels of increased interest in future activities related to PES and synthetic biology; valued aspects of interpersonal interactions central to dialogue-based programming; and described learning about societal decision-making around synthetic biology. Event participants valued enjoyment and access to content and reported slightly larger learning gains. The current study may help program coordinators and educators thoughtfully select a PES product type that promotes outcomes aligned with their goals: events featuring hands-on activities may support greater understanding of scientific relevance, and forum programs might encourage learning and behavior that leads to deliberative processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5969417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Society of Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59694172018-06-14 Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes Todd, Katie Haupt, Gretchen Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz Pfeifle, Sarah J Microbiol Biol Educ Science Communication Public engagement with science (PES) is an emerging outreach method that builds trust between scientists and public audiences by encouraging two-way conversations and mutual learning about science content and societal values. Building with Biology, a PES initiative focused on synthetic biology, distributed 182 kits with two types of products to informal science education institutions across the United States: 1) hands-on activities for public events, and 2) materials to run public dialogue programs, called forums. This article compares the interest levels, perceived value, and learning of public participants at these events and forums. Forum participants reported slightly higher levels of increased interest in future activities related to PES and synthetic biology; valued aspects of interpersonal interactions central to dialogue-based programming; and described learning about societal decision-making around synthetic biology. Event participants valued enjoyment and access to content and reported slightly larger learning gains. The current study may help program coordinators and educators thoughtfully select a PES product type that promotes outcomes aligned with their goals: events featuring hands-on activities may support greater understanding of scientific relevance, and forum programs might encourage learning and behavior that leads to deliberative processes. American Society of Microbiology 2018-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5969417/ /pubmed/29904531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1434 Text en ©2018 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ and https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode), which grants the public the nonexclusive right to copy, distribute, or display the published work. |
spellingShingle | Science Communication Todd, Katie Haupt, Gretchen Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz Pfeifle, Sarah Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes |
title | Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes |
title_full | Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes |
title_short | Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes |
title_sort | fostering conversation about synthetic biology between publics and scientists: a comparison of approaches and outcomes |
topic | Science Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29904531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toddkatie fosteringconversationaboutsyntheticbiologybetweenpublicsandscientistsacomparisonofapproachesandoutcomes AT hauptgretchen fosteringconversationaboutsyntheticbiologybetweenpublicsandscientistsacomparisonofapproachesandoutcomes AT kollmannelizabethkunz fosteringconversationaboutsyntheticbiologybetweenpublicsandscientistsacomparisonofapproachesandoutcomes AT pfeiflesarah fosteringconversationaboutsyntheticbiologybetweenpublicsandscientistsacomparisonofapproachesandoutcomes |