Cargando…

Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes

Public engagement with science (PES) is an emerging outreach method that builds trust between scientists and public audiences by encouraging two-way conversations and mutual learning about science content and societal values. Building with Biology, a PES initiative focused on synthetic biology, dist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Todd, Katie, Haupt, Gretchen, Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz, Pfeifle, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Microbiology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29904531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1434
_version_ 1783325965064077312
author Todd, Katie
Haupt, Gretchen
Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz
Pfeifle, Sarah
author_facet Todd, Katie
Haupt, Gretchen
Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz
Pfeifle, Sarah
author_sort Todd, Katie
collection PubMed
description Public engagement with science (PES) is an emerging outreach method that builds trust between scientists and public audiences by encouraging two-way conversations and mutual learning about science content and societal values. Building with Biology, a PES initiative focused on synthetic biology, distributed 182 kits with two types of products to informal science education institutions across the United States: 1) hands-on activities for public events, and 2) materials to run public dialogue programs, called forums. This article compares the interest levels, perceived value, and learning of public participants at these events and forums. Forum participants reported slightly higher levels of increased interest in future activities related to PES and synthetic biology; valued aspects of interpersonal interactions central to dialogue-based programming; and described learning about societal decision-making around synthetic biology. Event participants valued enjoyment and access to content and reported slightly larger learning gains. The current study may help program coordinators and educators thoughtfully select a PES product type that promotes outcomes aligned with their goals: events featuring hands-on activities may support greater understanding of scientific relevance, and forum programs might encourage learning and behavior that leads to deliberative processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5969417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Society of Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59694172018-06-14 Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes Todd, Katie Haupt, Gretchen Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz Pfeifle, Sarah J Microbiol Biol Educ Science Communication Public engagement with science (PES) is an emerging outreach method that builds trust between scientists and public audiences by encouraging two-way conversations and mutual learning about science content and societal values. Building with Biology, a PES initiative focused on synthetic biology, distributed 182 kits with two types of products to informal science education institutions across the United States: 1) hands-on activities for public events, and 2) materials to run public dialogue programs, called forums. This article compares the interest levels, perceived value, and learning of public participants at these events and forums. Forum participants reported slightly higher levels of increased interest in future activities related to PES and synthetic biology; valued aspects of interpersonal interactions central to dialogue-based programming; and described learning about societal decision-making around synthetic biology. Event participants valued enjoyment and access to content and reported slightly larger learning gains. The current study may help program coordinators and educators thoughtfully select a PES product type that promotes outcomes aligned with their goals: events featuring hands-on activities may support greater understanding of scientific relevance, and forum programs might encourage learning and behavior that leads to deliberative processes. American Society of Microbiology 2018-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5969417/ /pubmed/29904531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1434 Text en ©2018 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ and https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode), which grants the public the nonexclusive right to copy, distribute, or display the published work.
spellingShingle Science Communication
Todd, Katie
Haupt, Gretchen
Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz
Pfeifle, Sarah
Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes
title Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes
title_full Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes
title_fullStr Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes
title_short Fostering Conversation about Synthetic Biology Between Publics and Scientists: A Comparison of Approaches and Outcomes
title_sort fostering conversation about synthetic biology between publics and scientists: a comparison of approaches and outcomes
topic Science Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29904531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1434
work_keys_str_mv AT toddkatie fosteringconversationaboutsyntheticbiologybetweenpublicsandscientistsacomparisonofapproachesandoutcomes
AT hauptgretchen fosteringconversationaboutsyntheticbiologybetweenpublicsandscientistsacomparisonofapproachesandoutcomes
AT kollmannelizabethkunz fosteringconversationaboutsyntheticbiologybetweenpublicsandscientistsacomparisonofapproachesandoutcomes
AT pfeiflesarah fosteringconversationaboutsyntheticbiologybetweenpublicsandscientistsacomparisonofapproachesandoutcomes