Cargando…

Development of a clinical protocol for detection of cervical cancer precursor lesions

OBJECTIVE: to develop and validate the content of a clinical protocol aimed at prevention of cervical cancer in primary care. METHOD: technological research according to the steps: (1) submission of the project to the research ethics committee; (2) bibliographic survey; (3) elaboration of the clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sousa, Deise Maria Do Nascimento, Chagas, Ana Carolina Maria Araújo, Vasconcelos, Camila Teixeira Moreira, Stein, Airton Tetelbom, Oriá, Mônica Oliveira Batista
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29791673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2340.2999
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: to develop and validate the content of a clinical protocol aimed at prevention of cervical cancer in primary care. METHOD: technological research according to the steps: (1) submission of the project to the research ethics committee; (2) bibliographic survey; (3) elaboration of the clinical protocol; and (4) content validation. In the third step, the information was collected through bibliographic research and gynecology specialists were consulted. For the final step, four judges were selected to evaluate the clinical protocol according to AGREE 2. Domains that reached the minimum level of agreement of 75% in the scores were considered validated. RESULTS: the scores obtained in each domain of the instrument were as follows: domain 1 (scope and purpose) = 87.5%; domain 2 (stakeholder involvement) = 83.3%; domain 3 (development rigor) = 79.7%; domain 4 (clarity of presentation) = 76.3%; domain 5 (applicability) = 78.1%; and domain 6 (editorial independence) = 85.4. CONCLUSION: the clinical protocol proved to be a validated material with scores above the minimum required. The protocol obtained positive recommendations with modifications and went through adjustments in order to make it more effective.