Cargando…

Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing

A prospective analysis investigating the associations between pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) and ultrasound soft markers (USMs) in fetuses and evaluating the clinical value of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) in such pregnancy studies was carried out. 3,398 unrelated Chinese wom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jing, Chen, Lin, Zhou, Cong, Wang, Li, Xie, Hanbing, Xiao, Yuanyuan, Yin, Daishu, Zeng, Yang, Tang, Feng, Yang, Yunyuan, Zhu, Hongmei, Chen, Xinlian, Zhu, Qian, Liu, Zhiying, Liu, Hongqian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5970175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29802277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26555-6
_version_ 1783326069016756224
author Wang, Jing
Chen, Lin
Zhou, Cong
Wang, Li
Xie, Hanbing
Xiao, Yuanyuan
Yin, Daishu
Zeng, Yang
Tang, Feng
Yang, Yunyuan
Zhu, Hongmei
Chen, Xinlian
Zhu, Qian
Liu, Zhiying
Liu, Hongqian
author_facet Wang, Jing
Chen, Lin
Zhou, Cong
Wang, Li
Xie, Hanbing
Xiao, Yuanyuan
Yin, Daishu
Zeng, Yang
Tang, Feng
Yang, Yunyuan
Zhu, Hongmei
Chen, Xinlian
Zhu, Qian
Liu, Zhiying
Liu, Hongqian
author_sort Wang, Jing
collection PubMed
description A prospective analysis investigating the associations between pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) and ultrasound soft markers (USMs) in fetuses and evaluating the clinical value of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) in such pregnancy studies was carried out. 3,398 unrelated Chinese women with singleton pregnancies and undergone amniocentesis at 18–36 weeks of gestation for fetal CNV-seq were included. According to the prenatal fetal ultrasound screening results, the samples were divided into 3 groups: normal ultrasound (n = 2616), solitary USM (n = 663), and two or more USMs (n = 119). CNV-seq was performed successfully using all samples. The prevalence of pCNVs in fetuses with normal ultrasound and USMs was 3.03% (79/2616) and 2.94% (23/782), respectively. The risk of segmental aneuploidies was significantly higher in the two or more USMs group (5/119, 4.20%) than in the normal ultrasound (27/2616, 1.04%) or solitary USM (9/663, 1.36%) groups (p = 0.002 and p = 0.031, respectively). Assuming that the resolution of karyotyping is ~5 Mb, a cytogenetic analysis would miss 33 of 102 (32.35%) pCNVs in these samples. Our results suggest an association between pCNVs and fetal USMs; multiple USMs indicate an increased risk of fetal segmental aneuploidies. In prenatal diagnostic testing, CNV-Seq identified additional, clinically significant cytogenetic information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5970175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59701752018-05-30 Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing Wang, Jing Chen, Lin Zhou, Cong Wang, Li Xie, Hanbing Xiao, Yuanyuan Yin, Daishu Zeng, Yang Tang, Feng Yang, Yunyuan Zhu, Hongmei Chen, Xinlian Zhu, Qian Liu, Zhiying Liu, Hongqian Sci Rep Article A prospective analysis investigating the associations between pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) and ultrasound soft markers (USMs) in fetuses and evaluating the clinical value of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) in such pregnancy studies was carried out. 3,398 unrelated Chinese women with singleton pregnancies and undergone amniocentesis at 18–36 weeks of gestation for fetal CNV-seq were included. According to the prenatal fetal ultrasound screening results, the samples were divided into 3 groups: normal ultrasound (n = 2616), solitary USM (n = 663), and two or more USMs (n = 119). CNV-seq was performed successfully using all samples. The prevalence of pCNVs in fetuses with normal ultrasound and USMs was 3.03% (79/2616) and 2.94% (23/782), respectively. The risk of segmental aneuploidies was significantly higher in the two or more USMs group (5/119, 4.20%) than in the normal ultrasound (27/2616, 1.04%) or solitary USM (9/663, 1.36%) groups (p = 0.002 and p = 0.031, respectively). Assuming that the resolution of karyotyping is ~5 Mb, a cytogenetic analysis would miss 33 of 102 (32.35%) pCNVs in these samples. Our results suggest an association between pCNVs and fetal USMs; multiple USMs indicate an increased risk of fetal segmental aneuploidies. In prenatal diagnostic testing, CNV-Seq identified additional, clinically significant cytogenetic information. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5970175/ /pubmed/29802277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26555-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Jing
Chen, Lin
Zhou, Cong
Wang, Li
Xie, Hanbing
Xiao, Yuanyuan
Yin, Daishu
Zeng, Yang
Tang, Feng
Yang, Yunyuan
Zhu, Hongmei
Chen, Xinlian
Zhu, Qian
Liu, Zhiying
Liu, Hongqian
Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing
title Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing
title_full Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing
title_fullStr Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing
title_short Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing
title_sort identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5970175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29802277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26555-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjing identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT chenlin identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT zhoucong identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT wangli identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT xiehanbing identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT xiaoyuanyuan identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT yindaishu identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT zengyang identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT tangfeng identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT yangyunyuan identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT zhuhongmei identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT chenxinlian identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT zhuqian identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT liuzhiying identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing
AT liuhongqian identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing