Cargando…
Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing
A prospective analysis investigating the associations between pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) and ultrasound soft markers (USMs) in fetuses and evaluating the clinical value of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) in such pregnancy studies was carried out. 3,398 unrelated Chinese wom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5970175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29802277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26555-6 |
_version_ | 1783326069016756224 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jing Chen, Lin Zhou, Cong Wang, Li Xie, Hanbing Xiao, Yuanyuan Yin, Daishu Zeng, Yang Tang, Feng Yang, Yunyuan Zhu, Hongmei Chen, Xinlian Zhu, Qian Liu, Zhiying Liu, Hongqian |
author_facet | Wang, Jing Chen, Lin Zhou, Cong Wang, Li Xie, Hanbing Xiao, Yuanyuan Yin, Daishu Zeng, Yang Tang, Feng Yang, Yunyuan Zhu, Hongmei Chen, Xinlian Zhu, Qian Liu, Zhiying Liu, Hongqian |
author_sort | Wang, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | A prospective analysis investigating the associations between pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) and ultrasound soft markers (USMs) in fetuses and evaluating the clinical value of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) in such pregnancy studies was carried out. 3,398 unrelated Chinese women with singleton pregnancies and undergone amniocentesis at 18–36 weeks of gestation for fetal CNV-seq were included. According to the prenatal fetal ultrasound screening results, the samples were divided into 3 groups: normal ultrasound (n = 2616), solitary USM (n = 663), and two or more USMs (n = 119). CNV-seq was performed successfully using all samples. The prevalence of pCNVs in fetuses with normal ultrasound and USMs was 3.03% (79/2616) and 2.94% (23/782), respectively. The risk of segmental aneuploidies was significantly higher in the two or more USMs group (5/119, 4.20%) than in the normal ultrasound (27/2616, 1.04%) or solitary USM (9/663, 1.36%) groups (p = 0.002 and p = 0.031, respectively). Assuming that the resolution of karyotyping is ~5 Mb, a cytogenetic analysis would miss 33 of 102 (32.35%) pCNVs in these samples. Our results suggest an association between pCNVs and fetal USMs; multiple USMs indicate an increased risk of fetal segmental aneuploidies. In prenatal diagnostic testing, CNV-Seq identified additional, clinically significant cytogenetic information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5970175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59701752018-05-30 Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing Wang, Jing Chen, Lin Zhou, Cong Wang, Li Xie, Hanbing Xiao, Yuanyuan Yin, Daishu Zeng, Yang Tang, Feng Yang, Yunyuan Zhu, Hongmei Chen, Xinlian Zhu, Qian Liu, Zhiying Liu, Hongqian Sci Rep Article A prospective analysis investigating the associations between pathogenic copy number variations (pCNVs) and ultrasound soft markers (USMs) in fetuses and evaluating the clinical value of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) in such pregnancy studies was carried out. 3,398 unrelated Chinese women with singleton pregnancies and undergone amniocentesis at 18–36 weeks of gestation for fetal CNV-seq were included. According to the prenatal fetal ultrasound screening results, the samples were divided into 3 groups: normal ultrasound (n = 2616), solitary USM (n = 663), and two or more USMs (n = 119). CNV-seq was performed successfully using all samples. The prevalence of pCNVs in fetuses with normal ultrasound and USMs was 3.03% (79/2616) and 2.94% (23/782), respectively. The risk of segmental aneuploidies was significantly higher in the two or more USMs group (5/119, 4.20%) than in the normal ultrasound (27/2616, 1.04%) or solitary USM (9/663, 1.36%) groups (p = 0.002 and p = 0.031, respectively). Assuming that the resolution of karyotyping is ~5 Mb, a cytogenetic analysis would miss 33 of 102 (32.35%) pCNVs in these samples. Our results suggest an association between pCNVs and fetal USMs; multiple USMs indicate an increased risk of fetal segmental aneuploidies. In prenatal diagnostic testing, CNV-Seq identified additional, clinically significant cytogenetic information. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5970175/ /pubmed/29802277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26555-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Jing Chen, Lin Zhou, Cong Wang, Li Xie, Hanbing Xiao, Yuanyuan Yin, Daishu Zeng, Yang Tang, Feng Yang, Yunyuan Zhu, Hongmei Chen, Xinlian Zhu, Qian Liu, Zhiying Liu, Hongqian Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing |
title | Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing |
title_full | Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing |
title_fullStr | Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing |
title_short | Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing |
title_sort | identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5970175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29802277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26555-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjing identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT chenlin identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT zhoucong identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT wangli identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT xiehanbing identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT xiaoyuanyuan identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT yindaishu identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT zengyang identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT tangfeng identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT yangyunyuan identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT zhuhongmei identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT chenxinlian identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT zhuqian identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT liuzhiying identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing AT liuhongqian identificationofcopynumbervariationsamongfetuseswithultrasoundsoftmarkersusingnextgenerationsequencing |