Cargando…

Trends in child maltreatment in Germany: comparison of two representative population-based studies

BACKGROUND: Child maltreatment of all types is a serious concern for society, and it is important to monitor trends in incidence in order to inform child welfare agencies and policy-makers about emerging issues. In Germany, however, information on such trends is limited: apart from official sources,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Witt, Andreas, Glaesmer, Heide, Jud, Andreas, Plener, Paul L., Brähler, Elmar, Brown, Rebecca C., Fegert, Jörg M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5970447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13034-018-0232-5
_version_ 1783326130334334976
author Witt, Andreas
Glaesmer, Heide
Jud, Andreas
Plener, Paul L.
Brähler, Elmar
Brown, Rebecca C.
Fegert, Jörg M.
author_facet Witt, Andreas
Glaesmer, Heide
Jud, Andreas
Plener, Paul L.
Brähler, Elmar
Brown, Rebecca C.
Fegert, Jörg M.
author_sort Witt, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Child maltreatment of all types is a serious concern for society, and it is important to monitor trends in incidence in order to inform child welfare agencies and policy-makers about emerging issues. In Germany, however, information on such trends is limited: apart from official sources, the only published study is a comparison of surveys conducted in 1992 and 2011 that had focused primarily on sexual abuse. The present study is the first to look at more recent trends and to examine other types of maltreatment as well. METHODS: We compared the datasets of two population-based nationwide surveys, one conducted in 2010 (N = 2504) and the other in 2016 (N = 2510). Both had used identical methodology. Participants aged 14 years and older had been selected randomly using the Kish selection grid method, and information about childhood experiences of abuse had been solicited using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall percentage of respondents who reported having experienced at least one type of child maltreatment decreased over the 6 years, from 35.3% in 2010 to 31.0% in 2016; however, the percentages who reported multiple types of maltreatment remained stable. The decrease in any type of maltreatment was mainly driven by fewer reports of physical neglect, which was likelier to be reported by older respondents who had experienced privation during the (post-) war years and whose representation was lower in the later survey. There was a significant increase over time in the prevalence of emotional abuse, with respondents aged 26–45 years reporting higher rates of this type of maltreatment. The prevalence rates of other types of maltreatment remained unchanged. All effect sizes were very small. CONCLUSIONS: At present, the systems in place in Germany for monitoring the occurrence of child maltreatment are insufficient. While this study contributes to a better understanding, more information is needed, particularly on populations that have been excluded or underrepresented in previous research efforts. As has been done elsewhere, large databases should be set up, using identical methodologies and definitions, in order to accurately assess trends over time in different types of abuse and neglect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5970447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59704472018-05-30 Trends in child maltreatment in Germany: comparison of two representative population-based studies Witt, Andreas Glaesmer, Heide Jud, Andreas Plener, Paul L. Brähler, Elmar Brown, Rebecca C. Fegert, Jörg M. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Child maltreatment of all types is a serious concern for society, and it is important to monitor trends in incidence in order to inform child welfare agencies and policy-makers about emerging issues. In Germany, however, information on such trends is limited: apart from official sources, the only published study is a comparison of surveys conducted in 1992 and 2011 that had focused primarily on sexual abuse. The present study is the first to look at more recent trends and to examine other types of maltreatment as well. METHODS: We compared the datasets of two population-based nationwide surveys, one conducted in 2010 (N = 2504) and the other in 2016 (N = 2510). Both had used identical methodology. Participants aged 14 years and older had been selected randomly using the Kish selection grid method, and information about childhood experiences of abuse had been solicited using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall percentage of respondents who reported having experienced at least one type of child maltreatment decreased over the 6 years, from 35.3% in 2010 to 31.0% in 2016; however, the percentages who reported multiple types of maltreatment remained stable. The decrease in any type of maltreatment was mainly driven by fewer reports of physical neglect, which was likelier to be reported by older respondents who had experienced privation during the (post-) war years and whose representation was lower in the later survey. There was a significant increase over time in the prevalence of emotional abuse, with respondents aged 26–45 years reporting higher rates of this type of maltreatment. The prevalence rates of other types of maltreatment remained unchanged. All effect sizes were very small. CONCLUSIONS: At present, the systems in place in Germany for monitoring the occurrence of child maltreatment are insufficient. While this study contributes to a better understanding, more information is needed, particularly on populations that have been excluded or underrepresented in previous research efforts. As has been done elsewhere, large databases should be set up, using identical methodologies and definitions, in order to accurately assess trends over time in different types of abuse and neglect. BioMed Central 2018-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5970447/ /pubmed/29849753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13034-018-0232-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Witt, Andreas
Glaesmer, Heide
Jud, Andreas
Plener, Paul L.
Brähler, Elmar
Brown, Rebecca C.
Fegert, Jörg M.
Trends in child maltreatment in Germany: comparison of two representative population-based studies
title Trends in child maltreatment in Germany: comparison of two representative population-based studies
title_full Trends in child maltreatment in Germany: comparison of two representative population-based studies
title_fullStr Trends in child maltreatment in Germany: comparison of two representative population-based studies
title_full_unstemmed Trends in child maltreatment in Germany: comparison of two representative population-based studies
title_short Trends in child maltreatment in Germany: comparison of two representative population-based studies
title_sort trends in child maltreatment in germany: comparison of two representative population-based studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5970447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13034-018-0232-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wittandreas trendsinchildmaltreatmentingermanycomparisonoftworepresentativepopulationbasedstudies
AT glaesmerheide trendsinchildmaltreatmentingermanycomparisonoftworepresentativepopulationbasedstudies
AT judandreas trendsinchildmaltreatmentingermanycomparisonoftworepresentativepopulationbasedstudies
AT plenerpaull trendsinchildmaltreatmentingermanycomparisonoftworepresentativepopulationbasedstudies
AT brahlerelmar trendsinchildmaltreatmentingermanycomparisonoftworepresentativepopulationbasedstudies
AT brownrebeccac trendsinchildmaltreatmentingermanycomparisonoftworepresentativepopulationbasedstudies
AT fegertjorgm trendsinchildmaltreatmentingermanycomparisonoftworepresentativepopulationbasedstudies