Cargando…
Reported use of evidence in clinical practice: a survey of rehabilitation practices in Norway
BACKGROUND: The South Eastern Health Region in Norway serves approximately 2.8 million people, which is more than half of Norway’s population. Physical medicine and rehabilitation services are provided by 9 public hospital trusts and 30 private rehabilitation facilities. The purposes of this study w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5970453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29801505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3193-8 |
_version_ | 1783326131765641216 |
---|---|
author | Moore, Jennifer L. Friis, Svein Graham, Ian D. Gundersen, Elisabeth Troøyen Nordvik, Jan E. |
author_facet | Moore, Jennifer L. Friis, Svein Graham, Ian D. Gundersen, Elisabeth Troøyen Nordvik, Jan E. |
author_sort | Moore, Jennifer L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The South Eastern Health Region in Norway serves approximately 2.8 million people, which is more than half of Norway’s population. Physical medicine and rehabilitation services are provided by 9 public hospital trusts and 30 private rehabilitation facilities. The purposes of this study were to conduct a psychometric analysis of the EBP Implementation Scale (EBPIS) and describe rehabilitation clinicians’ self-reported 1) use of evidence-based practices (EBPs), 2) use of EBPs across hospitals, and 3) determine factors associated with use of EBPs in the South Eastern Health Region in Norway. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using an online survey was conducted with public hospitals and private rehabilitation centers. The survey, which was distributed throughout the region, included the EBPIS, 8 questions related to EBP in the health region, and demographics. Response frequencies were calculated and described. Internal consistency and factor structure of the EBPIS and its subscales were determined. Associations and differences in groups with similar demographics, EBPIS scores, and use of EBPs were identified. RESULTS: A total of 316 individuals completed the survey, including allied health clinicians, nurses, psychologists, social workers, and physicians. The EBPIS mean score was 30/72. A factor analysis identified that the EBPIS can be divided into 3 subscales: literature search and critical appraisal (α = .80), knowledge sharing (α = .83), and practice evaluation (α = .74). EBP activities reported were primarily related to literature searches, critical appraisal, and discussing evidence. Approximately 65 and 75% of respondents agreed that the same OMs and evidence based interventions were used within the local clinic respectively. Fewer agreed that the same OMs (13%) and evidence-based interventions (39%) are used regionally. CONCLUSION: The EBPIS and its subscales demonstrated excellent internal consistency. Practice variability exists in rehabilitation throughout Southeastern Norway. An increased emphasis on use of EBP throughout the region is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5970453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59704532018-05-30 Reported use of evidence in clinical practice: a survey of rehabilitation practices in Norway Moore, Jennifer L. Friis, Svein Graham, Ian D. Gundersen, Elisabeth Troøyen Nordvik, Jan E. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The South Eastern Health Region in Norway serves approximately 2.8 million people, which is more than half of Norway’s population. Physical medicine and rehabilitation services are provided by 9 public hospital trusts and 30 private rehabilitation facilities. The purposes of this study were to conduct a psychometric analysis of the EBP Implementation Scale (EBPIS) and describe rehabilitation clinicians’ self-reported 1) use of evidence-based practices (EBPs), 2) use of EBPs across hospitals, and 3) determine factors associated with use of EBPs in the South Eastern Health Region in Norway. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using an online survey was conducted with public hospitals and private rehabilitation centers. The survey, which was distributed throughout the region, included the EBPIS, 8 questions related to EBP in the health region, and demographics. Response frequencies were calculated and described. Internal consistency and factor structure of the EBPIS and its subscales were determined. Associations and differences in groups with similar demographics, EBPIS scores, and use of EBPs were identified. RESULTS: A total of 316 individuals completed the survey, including allied health clinicians, nurses, psychologists, social workers, and physicians. The EBPIS mean score was 30/72. A factor analysis identified that the EBPIS can be divided into 3 subscales: literature search and critical appraisal (α = .80), knowledge sharing (α = .83), and practice evaluation (α = .74). EBP activities reported were primarily related to literature searches, critical appraisal, and discussing evidence. Approximately 65 and 75% of respondents agreed that the same OMs and evidence based interventions were used within the local clinic respectively. Fewer agreed that the same OMs (13%) and evidence-based interventions (39%) are used regionally. CONCLUSION: The EBPIS and its subscales demonstrated excellent internal consistency. Practice variability exists in rehabilitation throughout Southeastern Norway. An increased emphasis on use of EBP throughout the region is needed. BioMed Central 2018-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5970453/ /pubmed/29801505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3193-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moore, Jennifer L. Friis, Svein Graham, Ian D. Gundersen, Elisabeth Troøyen Nordvik, Jan E. Reported use of evidence in clinical practice: a survey of rehabilitation practices in Norway |
title | Reported use of evidence in clinical practice: a survey of rehabilitation practices in Norway |
title_full | Reported use of evidence in clinical practice: a survey of rehabilitation practices in Norway |
title_fullStr | Reported use of evidence in clinical practice: a survey of rehabilitation practices in Norway |
title_full_unstemmed | Reported use of evidence in clinical practice: a survey of rehabilitation practices in Norway |
title_short | Reported use of evidence in clinical practice: a survey of rehabilitation practices in Norway |
title_sort | reported use of evidence in clinical practice: a survey of rehabilitation practices in norway |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5970453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29801505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3193-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moorejenniferl reporteduseofevidenceinclinicalpracticeasurveyofrehabilitationpracticesinnorway AT friissvein reporteduseofevidenceinclinicalpracticeasurveyofrehabilitationpracticesinnorway AT grahamiand reporteduseofevidenceinclinicalpracticeasurveyofrehabilitationpracticesinnorway AT gundersenelisabethtroøyen reporteduseofevidenceinclinicalpracticeasurveyofrehabilitationpracticesinnorway AT nordvikjane reporteduseofevidenceinclinicalpracticeasurveyofrehabilitationpracticesinnorway |