Cargando…

Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation

BACKGROUND: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has proven to be very useful to monitor the lung allograft after transplantation. In addition to allowing detection of infections, multiple BAL analytes have been proposed as potential biomarkers of lung allograft rejection or dysfunction. However, BAL collec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levy, Liran, Juvet, Stephen C., Boonstra, Kristen, Singer, Lianne G., Azad, Sassan, Joe, Betty, Cypel, Marcelo, Keshavjee, Shaf, Martinu, Tereza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5970521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29801490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0786-z
_version_ 1783326147766910976
author Levy, Liran
Juvet, Stephen C.
Boonstra, Kristen
Singer, Lianne G.
Azad, Sassan
Joe, Betty
Cypel, Marcelo
Keshavjee, Shaf
Martinu, Tereza
author_facet Levy, Liran
Juvet, Stephen C.
Boonstra, Kristen
Singer, Lianne G.
Azad, Sassan
Joe, Betty
Cypel, Marcelo
Keshavjee, Shaf
Martinu, Tereza
author_sort Levy, Liran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has proven to be very useful to monitor the lung allograft after transplantation. In addition to allowing detection of infections, multiple BAL analytes have been proposed as potential biomarkers of lung allograft rejection or dysfunction. However, BAL collection is not well standardized and differences in BAL collection represent an important source of variation. We hypothesized that there are systematic differences between sequential BALs that are relevant to BAL analysis. METHODS: As part of 126 consecutive bronchoscopies in lung transplant recipients, two sequential BALs (BAL1 and BAL2) were performed in one location during each bronchoscopy by instilling and suctioning 50 ml of normal saline twice into separate containers. Cell concentration, viability and differentials, Surfactant Protein-D (SP-D), Club Cell Secretory Protein (CCSP), and levels of CXCL10, IL-10, CCL2, CCL5, VEGF-C, RAGE, CXCL9, CXCL1, IL-17A, IL-21, PDGF, and GCSF were compared between BAL1 and BAL2. RESULTS: Total cell concentration did not differ between BAL1 and BAL2; however, compared to BAL2, BAL1 had more dead cells, epithelial cells, neutrophils, and higher concentrations of airway epithelium-derived CCSP and inflammatory markers. BAL2 had a higher concentration of SP-D compared to BAL1. CONCLUSION: In this study performed in lung transplant recipients, we show that sequential BALs represent different lung compartments and have distinct compositions. BAL1 represents the airway compartment with more epithelial cells, neutrophils, and epithelium-derived CCSP. Conversely, BAL2 samples preferentially the distal bronchoalveolar space with greater cell viability and higher SP-D. Our findings illustrate how the method of BAL collection can influence analyte concentrations and further emphasize the need for a standardized approach in translational research involving BAL samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0786-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5970521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59705212018-05-30 Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation Levy, Liran Juvet, Stephen C. Boonstra, Kristen Singer, Lianne G. Azad, Sassan Joe, Betty Cypel, Marcelo Keshavjee, Shaf Martinu, Tereza Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has proven to be very useful to monitor the lung allograft after transplantation. In addition to allowing detection of infections, multiple BAL analytes have been proposed as potential biomarkers of lung allograft rejection or dysfunction. However, BAL collection is not well standardized and differences in BAL collection represent an important source of variation. We hypothesized that there are systematic differences between sequential BALs that are relevant to BAL analysis. METHODS: As part of 126 consecutive bronchoscopies in lung transplant recipients, two sequential BALs (BAL1 and BAL2) were performed in one location during each bronchoscopy by instilling and suctioning 50 ml of normal saline twice into separate containers. Cell concentration, viability and differentials, Surfactant Protein-D (SP-D), Club Cell Secretory Protein (CCSP), and levels of CXCL10, IL-10, CCL2, CCL5, VEGF-C, RAGE, CXCL9, CXCL1, IL-17A, IL-21, PDGF, and GCSF were compared between BAL1 and BAL2. RESULTS: Total cell concentration did not differ between BAL1 and BAL2; however, compared to BAL2, BAL1 had more dead cells, epithelial cells, neutrophils, and higher concentrations of airway epithelium-derived CCSP and inflammatory markers. BAL2 had a higher concentration of SP-D compared to BAL1. CONCLUSION: In this study performed in lung transplant recipients, we show that sequential BALs represent different lung compartments and have distinct compositions. BAL1 represents the airway compartment with more epithelial cells, neutrophils, and epithelium-derived CCSP. Conversely, BAL2 samples preferentially the distal bronchoalveolar space with greater cell viability and higher SP-D. Our findings illustrate how the method of BAL collection can influence analyte concentrations and further emphasize the need for a standardized approach in translational research involving BAL samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0786-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-25 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5970521/ /pubmed/29801490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0786-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Levy, Liran
Juvet, Stephen C.
Boonstra, Kristen
Singer, Lianne G.
Azad, Sassan
Joe, Betty
Cypel, Marcelo
Keshavjee, Shaf
Martinu, Tereza
Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation
title Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation
title_full Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation
title_fullStr Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation
title_short Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation
title_sort sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5970521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29801490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0786-z
work_keys_str_mv AT levyliran sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation
AT juvetstephenc sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation
AT boonstrakristen sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation
AT singerlianneg sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation
AT azadsassan sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation
AT joebetty sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation
AT cypelmarcelo sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation
AT keshavjeeshaf sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation
AT martinutereza sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation