Cargando…
Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation
BACKGROUND: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has proven to be very useful to monitor the lung allograft after transplantation. In addition to allowing detection of infections, multiple BAL analytes have been proposed as potential biomarkers of lung allograft rejection or dysfunction. However, BAL collec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5970521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29801490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0786-z |
_version_ | 1783326147766910976 |
---|---|
author | Levy, Liran Juvet, Stephen C. Boonstra, Kristen Singer, Lianne G. Azad, Sassan Joe, Betty Cypel, Marcelo Keshavjee, Shaf Martinu, Tereza |
author_facet | Levy, Liran Juvet, Stephen C. Boonstra, Kristen Singer, Lianne G. Azad, Sassan Joe, Betty Cypel, Marcelo Keshavjee, Shaf Martinu, Tereza |
author_sort | Levy, Liran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has proven to be very useful to monitor the lung allograft after transplantation. In addition to allowing detection of infections, multiple BAL analytes have been proposed as potential biomarkers of lung allograft rejection or dysfunction. However, BAL collection is not well standardized and differences in BAL collection represent an important source of variation. We hypothesized that there are systematic differences between sequential BALs that are relevant to BAL analysis. METHODS: As part of 126 consecutive bronchoscopies in lung transplant recipients, two sequential BALs (BAL1 and BAL2) were performed in one location during each bronchoscopy by instilling and suctioning 50 ml of normal saline twice into separate containers. Cell concentration, viability and differentials, Surfactant Protein-D (SP-D), Club Cell Secretory Protein (CCSP), and levels of CXCL10, IL-10, CCL2, CCL5, VEGF-C, RAGE, CXCL9, CXCL1, IL-17A, IL-21, PDGF, and GCSF were compared between BAL1 and BAL2. RESULTS: Total cell concentration did not differ between BAL1 and BAL2; however, compared to BAL2, BAL1 had more dead cells, epithelial cells, neutrophils, and higher concentrations of airway epithelium-derived CCSP and inflammatory markers. BAL2 had a higher concentration of SP-D compared to BAL1. CONCLUSION: In this study performed in lung transplant recipients, we show that sequential BALs represent different lung compartments and have distinct compositions. BAL1 represents the airway compartment with more epithelial cells, neutrophils, and epithelium-derived CCSP. Conversely, BAL2 samples preferentially the distal bronchoalveolar space with greater cell viability and higher SP-D. Our findings illustrate how the method of BAL collection can influence analyte concentrations and further emphasize the need for a standardized approach in translational research involving BAL samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0786-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5970521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59705212018-05-30 Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation Levy, Liran Juvet, Stephen C. Boonstra, Kristen Singer, Lianne G. Azad, Sassan Joe, Betty Cypel, Marcelo Keshavjee, Shaf Martinu, Tereza Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has proven to be very useful to monitor the lung allograft after transplantation. In addition to allowing detection of infections, multiple BAL analytes have been proposed as potential biomarkers of lung allograft rejection or dysfunction. However, BAL collection is not well standardized and differences in BAL collection represent an important source of variation. We hypothesized that there are systematic differences between sequential BALs that are relevant to BAL analysis. METHODS: As part of 126 consecutive bronchoscopies in lung transplant recipients, two sequential BALs (BAL1 and BAL2) were performed in one location during each bronchoscopy by instilling and suctioning 50 ml of normal saline twice into separate containers. Cell concentration, viability and differentials, Surfactant Protein-D (SP-D), Club Cell Secretory Protein (CCSP), and levels of CXCL10, IL-10, CCL2, CCL5, VEGF-C, RAGE, CXCL9, CXCL1, IL-17A, IL-21, PDGF, and GCSF were compared between BAL1 and BAL2. RESULTS: Total cell concentration did not differ between BAL1 and BAL2; however, compared to BAL2, BAL1 had more dead cells, epithelial cells, neutrophils, and higher concentrations of airway epithelium-derived CCSP and inflammatory markers. BAL2 had a higher concentration of SP-D compared to BAL1. CONCLUSION: In this study performed in lung transplant recipients, we show that sequential BALs represent different lung compartments and have distinct compositions. BAL1 represents the airway compartment with more epithelial cells, neutrophils, and epithelium-derived CCSP. Conversely, BAL2 samples preferentially the distal bronchoalveolar space with greater cell viability and higher SP-D. Our findings illustrate how the method of BAL collection can influence analyte concentrations and further emphasize the need for a standardized approach in translational research involving BAL samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0786-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-25 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5970521/ /pubmed/29801490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0786-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Levy, Liran Juvet, Stephen C. Boonstra, Kristen Singer, Lianne G. Azad, Sassan Joe, Betty Cypel, Marcelo Keshavjee, Shaf Martinu, Tereza Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation |
title | Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation |
title_full | Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation |
title_fullStr | Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation |
title_short | Sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation |
title_sort | sequential broncho-alveolar lavages reflect distinct pulmonary compartments: clinical and research implications in lung transplantation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5970521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29801490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0786-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levyliran sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation AT juvetstephenc sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation AT boonstrakristen sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation AT singerlianneg sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation AT azadsassan sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation AT joebetty sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation AT cypelmarcelo sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation AT keshavjeeshaf sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation AT martinutereza sequentialbronchoalveolarlavagesreflectdistinctpulmonarycompartmentsclinicalandresearchimplicationsinlungtransplantation |