Cargando…

Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition

In computational systems for visuo-haptic object recognition, vision and haptics are often modeled as separate processes. But this is far from what really happens in the human brain, where cross- as well as multimodal interactions take place between the two sensory modalities. Generally, three main...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toprak, Sibel, Navarro-Guerrero, Nicolás, Wermter, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12559-017-9536-7
_version_ 1783326224893870080
author Toprak, Sibel
Navarro-Guerrero, Nicolás
Wermter, Stefan
author_facet Toprak, Sibel
Navarro-Guerrero, Nicolás
Wermter, Stefan
author_sort Toprak, Sibel
collection PubMed
description In computational systems for visuo-haptic object recognition, vision and haptics are often modeled as separate processes. But this is far from what really happens in the human brain, where cross- as well as multimodal interactions take place between the two sensory modalities. Generally, three main principles can be identified as underlying the processing of the visual and haptic object-related stimuli in the brain: (1) hierarchical processing, (2) the divergence of the processing onto substreams for object shape and material perception, and (3) the experience-driven self-organization of the integratory neural circuits. The question arises whether an object recognition system can benefit in terms of performance from adopting these brain-inspired processing principles for the integration of the visual and haptic inputs. To address this, we compare the integration strategy that incorporates all three principles to the two commonly used integration strategies in the literature. We collected data with a NAO robot enhanced with inexpensive contact microphones as tactile sensors. The results of our experiments involving every-day objects indicate that (1) the contact microphones are a good alternative to capturing tactile information and that (2) organizing the processing of the visual and haptic inputs hierarchically and in two pre-processing streams is helpful performance-wise. Nevertheless, further research is needed to effectively quantify the role of each identified principle by itself as well as in combination with others.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5971043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59710432018-06-05 Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition Toprak, Sibel Navarro-Guerrero, Nicolás Wermter, Stefan Cognit Comput Article In computational systems for visuo-haptic object recognition, vision and haptics are often modeled as separate processes. But this is far from what really happens in the human brain, where cross- as well as multimodal interactions take place between the two sensory modalities. Generally, three main principles can be identified as underlying the processing of the visual and haptic object-related stimuli in the brain: (1) hierarchical processing, (2) the divergence of the processing onto substreams for object shape and material perception, and (3) the experience-driven self-organization of the integratory neural circuits. The question arises whether an object recognition system can benefit in terms of performance from adopting these brain-inspired processing principles for the integration of the visual and haptic inputs. To address this, we compare the integration strategy that incorporates all three principles to the two commonly used integration strategies in the literature. We collected data with a NAO robot enhanced with inexpensive contact microphones as tactile sensors. The results of our experiments involving every-day objects indicate that (1) the contact microphones are a good alternative to capturing tactile information and that (2) organizing the processing of the visual and haptic inputs hierarchically and in two pre-processing streams is helpful performance-wise. Nevertheless, further research is needed to effectively quantify the role of each identified principle by itself as well as in combination with others. Springer US 2017-12-28 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5971043/ /pubmed/29881470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12559-017-9536-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Toprak, Sibel
Navarro-Guerrero, Nicolás
Wermter, Stefan
Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition
title Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition
title_full Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition
title_fullStr Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition
title_short Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition
title_sort evaluating integration strategies for visuo-haptic object recognition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12559-017-9536-7
work_keys_str_mv AT topraksibel evaluatingintegrationstrategiesforvisuohapticobjectrecognition
AT navarroguerreronicolas evaluatingintegrationstrategiesforvisuohapticobjectrecognition
AT wermterstefan evaluatingintegrationstrategiesforvisuohapticobjectrecognition