Cargando…

Adolescent Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Use of Autograft Versus Allograft Hamstring

BACKGROUND: Recurrent patellar instability is commonly treated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR), and the use of allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions has demonstrated inferior outcomes. PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of allografts versus autografts in ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Nikhil, Bastrom, Tracey P., Dennis, M. Morgan, Pennock, Andrew T., Edmonds, Eric W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118774272
_version_ 1783326281283141632
author Kumar, Nikhil
Bastrom, Tracey P.
Dennis, M. Morgan
Pennock, Andrew T.
Edmonds, Eric W.
author_facet Kumar, Nikhil
Bastrom, Tracey P.
Dennis, M. Morgan
Pennock, Andrew T.
Edmonds, Eric W.
author_sort Kumar, Nikhil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recurrent patellar instability is commonly treated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR), and the use of allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions has demonstrated inferior outcomes. PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of allografts versus autografts in adolescent MPFLR for patellar instability. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed on patients younger than 18 years who underwent MPFLR for recurrent instability after failed nonoperative management over an 8-year period with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into autograft or allograft hamstring cohorts for comparison. Primary outcome measures were return to normal activity, incidence of redislocation/subluxation, pain, stiffness, other complications, and Kujala scores. Statistical analysis using unpaired t tests was performed, with an alpha value set at P < .05. RESULTS: After criteria were applied, 59 adolescents (36 allograft, 23 autograft; 38 girls, 21 boys) with a mean ± SD age of 15.2 ± 1.7 years and a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 1.9 years (allograft, 3.3 ± 1.1 years; autograft, 5.7 ± 2.1 years; P ≤ .001) were included. Seven patients had concurrent osteotomies (3 allograft, 4 autograft), 11 patients had concurrent loose body removals (5 allograft, 6 autograft), and 9 patients had concurrent lateral release (7 allograft, 2 autograft). Between groups, no significant difference was found in change between preoperative and most recent follow-up (mean, 1.2 ± 2.1) or rate of return to sports (mean, 73.3%). In total, 9 surgeries failed (3 allograft, 6 autograft). For the surviving grafts, a statistical difference in mean Kujala scores at final follow-up was noted (allograft, 92.7; autograft, 97.4; P = .02). CONCLUSION: We identified no significant differences in return to activity, pain score changes, and incidences of failure between patients undergoing MPFLR with allograft versus autograft. Although teenagers with surviving autograft MPFLR reported statistically higher Kujala scores, the mean score difference of 5 points was not clinically significant. It appears that using allograft tendon instead of autograft tissue for MPFLR in this teenage population does not adversely affect long-term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5971386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59713862018-05-31 Adolescent Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Use of Autograft Versus Allograft Hamstring Kumar, Nikhil Bastrom, Tracey P. Dennis, M. Morgan Pennock, Andrew T. Edmonds, Eric W. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Recurrent patellar instability is commonly treated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR), and the use of allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions has demonstrated inferior outcomes. PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of allografts versus autografts in adolescent MPFLR for patellar instability. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed on patients younger than 18 years who underwent MPFLR for recurrent instability after failed nonoperative management over an 8-year period with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into autograft or allograft hamstring cohorts for comparison. Primary outcome measures were return to normal activity, incidence of redislocation/subluxation, pain, stiffness, other complications, and Kujala scores. Statistical analysis using unpaired t tests was performed, with an alpha value set at P < .05. RESULTS: After criteria were applied, 59 adolescents (36 allograft, 23 autograft; 38 girls, 21 boys) with a mean ± SD age of 15.2 ± 1.7 years and a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 1.9 years (allograft, 3.3 ± 1.1 years; autograft, 5.7 ± 2.1 years; P ≤ .001) were included. Seven patients had concurrent osteotomies (3 allograft, 4 autograft), 11 patients had concurrent loose body removals (5 allograft, 6 autograft), and 9 patients had concurrent lateral release (7 allograft, 2 autograft). Between groups, no significant difference was found in change between preoperative and most recent follow-up (mean, 1.2 ± 2.1) or rate of return to sports (mean, 73.3%). In total, 9 surgeries failed (3 allograft, 6 autograft). For the surviving grafts, a statistical difference in mean Kujala scores at final follow-up was noted (allograft, 92.7; autograft, 97.4; P = .02). CONCLUSION: We identified no significant differences in return to activity, pain score changes, and incidences of failure between patients undergoing MPFLR with allograft versus autograft. Although teenagers with surviving autograft MPFLR reported statistically higher Kujala scores, the mean score difference of 5 points was not clinically significant. It appears that using allograft tendon instead of autograft tissue for MPFLR in this teenage population does not adversely affect long-term outcomes. SAGE Publications 2018-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5971386/ /pubmed/29854861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118774272 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Kumar, Nikhil
Bastrom, Tracey P.
Dennis, M. Morgan
Pennock, Andrew T.
Edmonds, Eric W.
Adolescent Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Use of Autograft Versus Allograft Hamstring
title Adolescent Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Use of Autograft Versus Allograft Hamstring
title_full Adolescent Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Use of Autograft Versus Allograft Hamstring
title_fullStr Adolescent Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Use of Autograft Versus Allograft Hamstring
title_full_unstemmed Adolescent Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Use of Autograft Versus Allograft Hamstring
title_short Adolescent Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Use of Autograft Versus Allograft Hamstring
title_sort adolescent medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the use of autograft versus allograft hamstring
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118774272
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarnikhil adolescentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionacomparisonoftheuseofautograftversusallografthamstring
AT bastromtraceyp adolescentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionacomparisonoftheuseofautograftversusallografthamstring
AT dennismmorgan adolescentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionacomparisonoftheuseofautograftversusallografthamstring
AT pennockandrewt adolescentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionacomparisonoftheuseofautograftversusallografthamstring
AT edmondsericw adolescentmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionacomparisonoftheuseofautograftversusallografthamstring