Cargando…
Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly
BACKGROUND: Balance performance is considered as an indicator of functional status in the elderly, a large scale population screening and evaluation in the community context followed by proper interventions would be of great significance at public health level. However, there has been no suitable ba...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29807543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0803-6 |
_version_ | 1783326287596617728 |
---|---|
author | Ju, Jingjuan Jiang, Yu Zhou, Peng Li, Lin Ye, Xiaolei Wu, Hongmei Shen, Bin Zhang, Jialei He, Xiaoding Niu, Chunjin Xia, Qinghua |
author_facet | Ju, Jingjuan Jiang, Yu Zhou, Peng Li, Lin Ye, Xiaolei Wu, Hongmei Shen, Bin Zhang, Jialei He, Xiaoding Niu, Chunjin Xia, Qinghua |
author_sort | Ju, Jingjuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Balance performance is considered as an indicator of functional status in the elderly, a large scale population screening and evaluation in the community context followed by proper interventions would be of great significance at public health level. However, there has been no suitable balance testing scale available for large scale studies in the unique community context of urban China. METHODS: A balance scale named X16 balance testing scale was developed, which was composed of 3 domains and 16 items. A total of 1985 functionally independent and active community-dwelling elderly adults’ balance abilities were tested using the X16 scale. The internal consistency, split-half reliability, content validity, construct validity, discriminant validity of X16 balance testing scale were evaluated. RESULTS: Factor analysis was performed to identify alternative factor structure. The Eigenvalues of factors 1, 2, and 3 were 8.53, 1.79, and 1.21, respectively, and their cumulative contribution to the total variance reached 72.0%. These 3 factors mainly represented domains static balance, postural stability, and dynamic balance. The Cronbach alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.933. The Spearman correlation coefficients between items and its corresponding domains were ranged from 0.538 to 0.964. The correlation coefficients between each item and its corresponding domain were higher than the coefficients between this item and other domains. With the increase of age, the scores of balance performance, domains static balance, postural stability, and dynamic balance in the elderly declined gradually (P < 0.001). With the increase of age, the proportion of the elderly with intact balance performance decreased gradually (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity of the X16 balance testing scale is both adequate and acceptable. Due to its simple and quick use features, it is practical to be used repeatedly and routinely especially in community setting and on large scale screening. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0803-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5971429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59714292018-05-30 Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly Ju, Jingjuan Jiang, Yu Zhou, Peng Li, Lin Ye, Xiaolei Wu, Hongmei Shen, Bin Zhang, Jialei He, Xiaoding Niu, Chunjin Xia, Qinghua BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Balance performance is considered as an indicator of functional status in the elderly, a large scale population screening and evaluation in the community context followed by proper interventions would be of great significance at public health level. However, there has been no suitable balance testing scale available for large scale studies in the unique community context of urban China. METHODS: A balance scale named X16 balance testing scale was developed, which was composed of 3 domains and 16 items. A total of 1985 functionally independent and active community-dwelling elderly adults’ balance abilities were tested using the X16 scale. The internal consistency, split-half reliability, content validity, construct validity, discriminant validity of X16 balance testing scale were evaluated. RESULTS: Factor analysis was performed to identify alternative factor structure. The Eigenvalues of factors 1, 2, and 3 were 8.53, 1.79, and 1.21, respectively, and their cumulative contribution to the total variance reached 72.0%. These 3 factors mainly represented domains static balance, postural stability, and dynamic balance. The Cronbach alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.933. The Spearman correlation coefficients between items and its corresponding domains were ranged from 0.538 to 0.964. The correlation coefficients between each item and its corresponding domain were higher than the coefficients between this item and other domains. With the increase of age, the scores of balance performance, domains static balance, postural stability, and dynamic balance in the elderly declined gradually (P < 0.001). With the increase of age, the proportion of the elderly with intact balance performance decreased gradually (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity of the X16 balance testing scale is both adequate and acceptable. Due to its simple and quick use features, it is practical to be used repeatedly and routinely especially in community setting and on large scale screening. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0803-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5971429/ /pubmed/29807543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0803-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ju, Jingjuan Jiang, Yu Zhou, Peng Li, Lin Ye, Xiaolei Wu, Hongmei Shen, Bin Zhang, Jialei He, Xiaoding Niu, Chunjin Xia, Qinghua Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly |
title | Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly |
title_full | Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly |
title_short | Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly |
title_sort | evaluation of the reliability and validity for x16 balance testing scale for the elderly |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29807543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0803-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jujingjuan evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly AT jiangyu evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly AT zhoupeng evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly AT lilin evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly AT yexiaolei evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly AT wuhongmei evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly AT shenbin evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly AT zhangjialei evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly AT hexiaoding evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly AT niuchunjin evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly AT xiaqinghua evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly |