Cargando…

Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly

BACKGROUND: Balance performance is considered as an indicator of functional status in the elderly, a large scale population screening and evaluation in the community context followed by proper interventions would be of great significance at public health level. However, there has been no suitable ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ju, Jingjuan, Jiang, Yu, Zhou, Peng, Li, Lin, Ye, Xiaolei, Wu, Hongmei, Shen, Bin, Zhang, Jialei, He, Xiaoding, Niu, Chunjin, Xia, Qinghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29807543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0803-6
_version_ 1783326287596617728
author Ju, Jingjuan
Jiang, Yu
Zhou, Peng
Li, Lin
Ye, Xiaolei
Wu, Hongmei
Shen, Bin
Zhang, Jialei
He, Xiaoding
Niu, Chunjin
Xia, Qinghua
author_facet Ju, Jingjuan
Jiang, Yu
Zhou, Peng
Li, Lin
Ye, Xiaolei
Wu, Hongmei
Shen, Bin
Zhang, Jialei
He, Xiaoding
Niu, Chunjin
Xia, Qinghua
author_sort Ju, Jingjuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Balance performance is considered as an indicator of functional status in the elderly, a large scale population screening and evaluation in the community context followed by proper interventions would be of great significance at public health level. However, there has been no suitable balance testing scale available for large scale studies in the unique community context of urban China. METHODS: A balance scale named X16 balance testing scale was developed, which was composed of 3 domains and 16 items. A total of 1985 functionally independent and active community-dwelling elderly adults’ balance abilities were tested using the X16 scale. The internal consistency, split-half reliability, content validity, construct validity, discriminant validity of X16 balance testing scale were evaluated. RESULTS: Factor analysis was performed to identify alternative factor structure. The Eigenvalues of factors 1, 2, and 3 were 8.53, 1.79, and 1.21, respectively, and their cumulative contribution to the total variance reached 72.0%. These 3 factors mainly represented domains static balance, postural stability, and dynamic balance. The Cronbach alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.933. The Spearman correlation coefficients between items and its corresponding domains were ranged from 0.538 to 0.964. The correlation coefficients between each item and its corresponding domain were higher than the coefficients between this item and other domains. With the increase of age, the scores of balance performance, domains static balance, postural stability, and dynamic balance in the elderly declined gradually (P < 0.001). With the increase of age, the proportion of the elderly with intact balance performance decreased gradually (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity of the X16 balance testing scale is both adequate and acceptable. Due to its simple and quick use features, it is practical to be used repeatedly and routinely especially in community setting and on large scale screening. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0803-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5971429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59714292018-05-30 Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly Ju, Jingjuan Jiang, Yu Zhou, Peng Li, Lin Ye, Xiaolei Wu, Hongmei Shen, Bin Zhang, Jialei He, Xiaoding Niu, Chunjin Xia, Qinghua BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Balance performance is considered as an indicator of functional status in the elderly, a large scale population screening and evaluation in the community context followed by proper interventions would be of great significance at public health level. However, there has been no suitable balance testing scale available for large scale studies in the unique community context of urban China. METHODS: A balance scale named X16 balance testing scale was developed, which was composed of 3 domains and 16 items. A total of 1985 functionally independent and active community-dwelling elderly adults’ balance abilities were tested using the X16 scale. The internal consistency, split-half reliability, content validity, construct validity, discriminant validity of X16 balance testing scale were evaluated. RESULTS: Factor analysis was performed to identify alternative factor structure. The Eigenvalues of factors 1, 2, and 3 were 8.53, 1.79, and 1.21, respectively, and their cumulative contribution to the total variance reached 72.0%. These 3 factors mainly represented domains static balance, postural stability, and dynamic balance. The Cronbach alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.933. The Spearman correlation coefficients between items and its corresponding domains were ranged from 0.538 to 0.964. The correlation coefficients between each item and its corresponding domain were higher than the coefficients between this item and other domains. With the increase of age, the scores of balance performance, domains static balance, postural stability, and dynamic balance in the elderly declined gradually (P < 0.001). With the increase of age, the proportion of the elderly with intact balance performance decreased gradually (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and validity of the X16 balance testing scale is both adequate and acceptable. Due to its simple and quick use features, it is practical to be used repeatedly and routinely especially in community setting and on large scale screening. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0803-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5971429/ /pubmed/29807543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0803-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ju, Jingjuan
Jiang, Yu
Zhou, Peng
Li, Lin
Ye, Xiaolei
Wu, Hongmei
Shen, Bin
Zhang, Jialei
He, Xiaoding
Niu, Chunjin
Xia, Qinghua
Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly
title Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly
title_full Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly
title_fullStr Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly
title_short Evaluation of the reliability and validity for X16 balance testing scale for the elderly
title_sort evaluation of the reliability and validity for x16 balance testing scale for the elderly
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29807543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0803-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jujingjuan evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly
AT jiangyu evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly
AT zhoupeng evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly
AT lilin evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly
AT yexiaolei evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly
AT wuhongmei evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly
AT shenbin evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly
AT zhangjialei evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly
AT hexiaoding evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly
AT niuchunjin evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly
AT xiaqinghua evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityforx16balancetestingscalefortheelderly