Cargando…

Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the activated clotting time (ACT) measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature (HACT) with the ACT measured using the Medtronic ACT Plus (MACT) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with acute normovolemic haemodilution (ANH) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jung Min, Park, Eun Young, Kim, Kyung Mi, Won, Jong Chan, Jung, Tack Koon, Lee, Soo Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517731952
_version_ 1783326297638830080
author Lee, Jung Min
Park, Eun Young
Kim, Kyung Mi
Won, Jong Chan
Jung, Tack Koon
Lee, Soo Kyung
author_facet Lee, Jung Min
Park, Eun Young
Kim, Kyung Mi
Won, Jong Chan
Jung, Tack Koon
Lee, Soo Kyung
author_sort Lee, Jung Min
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study compared the activated clotting time (ACT) measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature (HACT) with the ACT measured using the Medtronic ACT Plus (MACT) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with acute normovolemic haemodilution (ANH) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: The ACT was checked at baseline with both devices after inducing anaesthesia, and 400 to 800 mL of whole blood was withdrawn to induce moderate ANH. Before initiating CPB, a 300-IU/kg bolus dose of heparin was administered to maintain the HACT at >400 s; protamine was later given to reverse the anticoagulation. The ACT was checked using both devices at baseline, during heparinisation, and after protamine administration. RESULTS: In total, 106 pairs of samples from 29 patients were analysed. The ACT showed a good correlation between the two devices (r = 0.956). However, Bland–Altman analysis showed that the MACT was higher, particularly at baseline and during heparinisation. Multiple regression analysis showed that the blood glucose concentration significantly influenced the differences between the two ACT devices. CONCLUSIONS: The HACT was lower than the MACT during CPB with ANH in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Clinicians should be cautious when using each ACT device within generally accepted reference ACT values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5971518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59715182018-05-31 Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution Lee, Jung Min Park, Eun Young Kim, Kyung Mi Won, Jong Chan Jung, Tack Koon Lee, Soo Kyung J Int Med Res Clinical Reports OBJECTIVE: This study compared the activated clotting time (ACT) measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature (HACT) with the ACT measured using the Medtronic ACT Plus (MACT) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with acute normovolemic haemodilution (ANH) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: The ACT was checked at baseline with both devices after inducing anaesthesia, and 400 to 800 mL of whole blood was withdrawn to induce moderate ANH. Before initiating CPB, a 300-IU/kg bolus dose of heparin was administered to maintain the HACT at >400 s; protamine was later given to reverse the anticoagulation. The ACT was checked using both devices at baseline, during heparinisation, and after protamine administration. RESULTS: In total, 106 pairs of samples from 29 patients were analysed. The ACT showed a good correlation between the two devices (r = 0.956). However, Bland–Altman analysis showed that the MACT was higher, particularly at baseline and during heparinisation. Multiple regression analysis showed that the blood glucose concentration significantly influenced the differences between the two ACT devices. CONCLUSIONS: The HACT was lower than the MACT during CPB with ANH in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Clinicians should be cautious when using each ACT device within generally accepted reference ACT values. SAGE Publications 2017-10-04 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5971518/ /pubmed/28974132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517731952 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Reports
Lee, Jung Min
Park, Eun Young
Kim, Kyung Mi
Won, Jong Chan
Jung, Tack Koon
Lee, Soo Kyung
Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution
title Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution
title_full Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution
title_fullStr Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution
title_short Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution
title_sort comparison of activated clotting times measured using the hemochron jr. signature and medtronic act plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution
topic Clinical Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517731952
work_keys_str_mv AT leejungmin comparisonofactivatedclottingtimesmeasuredusingthehemochronjrsignatureandmedtronicactplusduringcardiopulmonarybypasswithacutenormovolemichaemodilution
AT parkeunyoung comparisonofactivatedclottingtimesmeasuredusingthehemochronjrsignatureandmedtronicactplusduringcardiopulmonarybypasswithacutenormovolemichaemodilution
AT kimkyungmi comparisonofactivatedclottingtimesmeasuredusingthehemochronjrsignatureandmedtronicactplusduringcardiopulmonarybypasswithacutenormovolemichaemodilution
AT wonjongchan comparisonofactivatedclottingtimesmeasuredusingthehemochronjrsignatureandmedtronicactplusduringcardiopulmonarybypasswithacutenormovolemichaemodilution
AT jungtackkoon comparisonofactivatedclottingtimesmeasuredusingthehemochronjrsignatureandmedtronicactplusduringcardiopulmonarybypasswithacutenormovolemichaemodilution
AT leesookyung comparisonofactivatedclottingtimesmeasuredusingthehemochronjrsignatureandmedtronicactplusduringcardiopulmonarybypasswithacutenormovolemichaemodilution