Cargando…
Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the activated clotting time (ACT) measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature (HACT) with the ACT measured using the Medtronic ACT Plus (MACT) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with acute normovolemic haemodilution (ANH) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517731952 |
_version_ | 1783326297638830080 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jung Min Park, Eun Young Kim, Kyung Mi Won, Jong Chan Jung, Tack Koon Lee, Soo Kyung |
author_facet | Lee, Jung Min Park, Eun Young Kim, Kyung Mi Won, Jong Chan Jung, Tack Koon Lee, Soo Kyung |
author_sort | Lee, Jung Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study compared the activated clotting time (ACT) measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature (HACT) with the ACT measured using the Medtronic ACT Plus (MACT) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with acute normovolemic haemodilution (ANH) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: The ACT was checked at baseline with both devices after inducing anaesthesia, and 400 to 800 mL of whole blood was withdrawn to induce moderate ANH. Before initiating CPB, a 300-IU/kg bolus dose of heparin was administered to maintain the HACT at >400 s; protamine was later given to reverse the anticoagulation. The ACT was checked using both devices at baseline, during heparinisation, and after protamine administration. RESULTS: In total, 106 pairs of samples from 29 patients were analysed. The ACT showed a good correlation between the two devices (r = 0.956). However, Bland–Altman analysis showed that the MACT was higher, particularly at baseline and during heparinisation. Multiple regression analysis showed that the blood glucose concentration significantly influenced the differences between the two ACT devices. CONCLUSIONS: The HACT was lower than the MACT during CPB with ANH in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Clinicians should be cautious when using each ACT device within generally accepted reference ACT values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5971518 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59715182018-05-31 Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution Lee, Jung Min Park, Eun Young Kim, Kyung Mi Won, Jong Chan Jung, Tack Koon Lee, Soo Kyung J Int Med Res Clinical Reports OBJECTIVE: This study compared the activated clotting time (ACT) measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature (HACT) with the ACT measured using the Medtronic ACT Plus (MACT) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with acute normovolemic haemodilution (ANH) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: The ACT was checked at baseline with both devices after inducing anaesthesia, and 400 to 800 mL of whole blood was withdrawn to induce moderate ANH. Before initiating CPB, a 300-IU/kg bolus dose of heparin was administered to maintain the HACT at >400 s; protamine was later given to reverse the anticoagulation. The ACT was checked using both devices at baseline, during heparinisation, and after protamine administration. RESULTS: In total, 106 pairs of samples from 29 patients were analysed. The ACT showed a good correlation between the two devices (r = 0.956). However, Bland–Altman analysis showed that the MACT was higher, particularly at baseline and during heparinisation. Multiple regression analysis showed that the blood glucose concentration significantly influenced the differences between the two ACT devices. CONCLUSIONS: The HACT was lower than the MACT during CPB with ANH in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Clinicians should be cautious when using each ACT device within generally accepted reference ACT values. SAGE Publications 2017-10-04 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5971518/ /pubmed/28974132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517731952 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Reports Lee, Jung Min Park, Eun Young Kim, Kyung Mi Won, Jong Chan Jung, Tack Koon Lee, Soo Kyung Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution |
title | Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution |
title_full | Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution |
title_fullStr | Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution |
title_short | Comparison of activated clotting times measured using the Hemochron Jr. Signature and Medtronic ACT Plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution |
title_sort | comparison of activated clotting times measured using the hemochron jr. signature and medtronic act plus during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute normovolemic haemodilution |
topic | Clinical Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517731952 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejungmin comparisonofactivatedclottingtimesmeasuredusingthehemochronjrsignatureandmedtronicactplusduringcardiopulmonarybypasswithacutenormovolemichaemodilution AT parkeunyoung comparisonofactivatedclottingtimesmeasuredusingthehemochronjrsignatureandmedtronicactplusduringcardiopulmonarybypasswithacutenormovolemichaemodilution AT kimkyungmi comparisonofactivatedclottingtimesmeasuredusingthehemochronjrsignatureandmedtronicactplusduringcardiopulmonarybypasswithacutenormovolemichaemodilution AT wonjongchan comparisonofactivatedclottingtimesmeasuredusingthehemochronjrsignatureandmedtronicactplusduringcardiopulmonarybypasswithacutenormovolemichaemodilution AT jungtackkoon comparisonofactivatedclottingtimesmeasuredusingthehemochronjrsignatureandmedtronicactplusduringcardiopulmonarybypasswithacutenormovolemichaemodilution AT leesookyung comparisonofactivatedclottingtimesmeasuredusingthehemochronjrsignatureandmedtronicactplusduringcardiopulmonarybypasswithacutenormovolemichaemodilution |