Cargando…

A randomised comparative study on customised versus fixed sized pillow for tracheal intubation in the sniffing position by Macintosh laryngoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The sniffing position has been most commonly used for positioning of the head and neck to facilitate tracheal intubation. However, the optimum degree of head elevation for the optimal laryngeal view is not well studied, especially in non-Western countries. The present study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhar, Mridul, Karim, Habib Md. Reazaul, Rajaram, Narayanan, Prakash, Avinash, Sahoo, Sarasa K, Narayan, Anilkumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910491
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_672_17
_version_ 1783326303318966272
author Dhar, Mridul
Karim, Habib Md. Reazaul
Rajaram, Narayanan
Prakash, Avinash
Sahoo, Sarasa K
Narayan, Anilkumar
author_facet Dhar, Mridul
Karim, Habib Md. Reazaul
Rajaram, Narayanan
Prakash, Avinash
Sahoo, Sarasa K
Narayan, Anilkumar
author_sort Dhar, Mridul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The sniffing position has been most commonly used for positioning of the head and neck to facilitate tracheal intubation. However, the optimum degree of head elevation for the optimal laryngeal view is not well studied, especially in non-Western countries. The present study was aimed to compare the use of a fixed height pillow versus a customised pillow (CP) height for head elevation, in terms of glottis visualisation and time required for tracheal intubation. METHODS: With research and ethics committee approval from the institute, this randomised study was conducted among patients of both sexes aged 16 years or more and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical Status I to IV. A total of 134 patients were randomly allocated into routinely used fixed-sized pillow (FP) and CP group (to achieve horizontal alignment of external auditory meatus [EAM] and sternal notch). Primary and secondary outcomes were Cormack–Lehane (C–L) grade of glottic visualisation and time required for tracheal intubation, respectively. They were compared using unpaired t-test and Fisher's exact test as applicable; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients completed the study. Both groups were similar in terms of demographic and external airway measurements. The mean ± standard deviation height of pillow required in Group CP was 6.26 ± 0.97 cm. Group FP had C–L Grade 3 view more often than Group CP (28.33% vs. 13.56%). In patients with modified Mallampati (MMP) Grade ≥3, the C–L grades and time required for intubation were both significantly lower in group CP. The time required for tracheal intubation was significantly lower in group CP (P = 0.04), even though the C–L grades were similar. CONCLUSION: Customising pillow for head elevation to horizontally align the EAM and the sternal notch gives better glottic visualisation and intubating conditions in patients with higher MMP grades.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5971622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59716222018-06-15 A randomised comparative study on customised versus fixed sized pillow for tracheal intubation in the sniffing position by Macintosh laryngoscopy Dhar, Mridul Karim, Habib Md. Reazaul Rajaram, Narayanan Prakash, Avinash Sahoo, Sarasa K Narayan, Anilkumar Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The sniffing position has been most commonly used for positioning of the head and neck to facilitate tracheal intubation. However, the optimum degree of head elevation for the optimal laryngeal view is not well studied, especially in non-Western countries. The present study was aimed to compare the use of a fixed height pillow versus a customised pillow (CP) height for head elevation, in terms of glottis visualisation and time required for tracheal intubation. METHODS: With research and ethics committee approval from the institute, this randomised study was conducted among patients of both sexes aged 16 years or more and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical Status I to IV. A total of 134 patients were randomly allocated into routinely used fixed-sized pillow (FP) and CP group (to achieve horizontal alignment of external auditory meatus [EAM] and sternal notch). Primary and secondary outcomes were Cormack–Lehane (C–L) grade of glottic visualisation and time required for tracheal intubation, respectively. They were compared using unpaired t-test and Fisher's exact test as applicable; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients completed the study. Both groups were similar in terms of demographic and external airway measurements. The mean ± standard deviation height of pillow required in Group CP was 6.26 ± 0.97 cm. Group FP had C–L Grade 3 view more often than Group CP (28.33% vs. 13.56%). In patients with modified Mallampati (MMP) Grade ≥3, the C–L grades and time required for intubation were both significantly lower in group CP. The time required for tracheal intubation was significantly lower in group CP (P = 0.04), even though the C–L grades were similar. CONCLUSION: Customising pillow for head elevation to horizontally align the EAM and the sternal notch gives better glottic visualisation and intubating conditions in patients with higher MMP grades. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5971622/ /pubmed/29910491 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_672_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dhar, Mridul
Karim, Habib Md. Reazaul
Rajaram, Narayanan
Prakash, Avinash
Sahoo, Sarasa K
Narayan, Anilkumar
A randomised comparative study on customised versus fixed sized pillow for tracheal intubation in the sniffing position by Macintosh laryngoscopy
title A randomised comparative study on customised versus fixed sized pillow for tracheal intubation in the sniffing position by Macintosh laryngoscopy
title_full A randomised comparative study on customised versus fixed sized pillow for tracheal intubation in the sniffing position by Macintosh laryngoscopy
title_fullStr A randomised comparative study on customised versus fixed sized pillow for tracheal intubation in the sniffing position by Macintosh laryngoscopy
title_full_unstemmed A randomised comparative study on customised versus fixed sized pillow for tracheal intubation in the sniffing position by Macintosh laryngoscopy
title_short A randomised comparative study on customised versus fixed sized pillow for tracheal intubation in the sniffing position by Macintosh laryngoscopy
title_sort randomised comparative study on customised versus fixed sized pillow for tracheal intubation in the sniffing position by macintosh laryngoscopy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5971622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910491
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_672_17
work_keys_str_mv AT dharmridul arandomisedcomparativestudyoncustomisedversusfixedsizedpillowfortrachealintubationinthesniffingpositionbymacintoshlaryngoscopy
AT karimhabibmdreazaul arandomisedcomparativestudyoncustomisedversusfixedsizedpillowfortrachealintubationinthesniffingpositionbymacintoshlaryngoscopy
AT rajaramnarayanan arandomisedcomparativestudyoncustomisedversusfixedsizedpillowfortrachealintubationinthesniffingpositionbymacintoshlaryngoscopy
AT prakashavinash arandomisedcomparativestudyoncustomisedversusfixedsizedpillowfortrachealintubationinthesniffingpositionbymacintoshlaryngoscopy
AT sahoosarasak arandomisedcomparativestudyoncustomisedversusfixedsizedpillowfortrachealintubationinthesniffingpositionbymacintoshlaryngoscopy
AT narayananilkumar arandomisedcomparativestudyoncustomisedversusfixedsizedpillowfortrachealintubationinthesniffingpositionbymacintoshlaryngoscopy
AT dharmridul randomisedcomparativestudyoncustomisedversusfixedsizedpillowfortrachealintubationinthesniffingpositionbymacintoshlaryngoscopy
AT karimhabibmdreazaul randomisedcomparativestudyoncustomisedversusfixedsizedpillowfortrachealintubationinthesniffingpositionbymacintoshlaryngoscopy
AT rajaramnarayanan randomisedcomparativestudyoncustomisedversusfixedsizedpillowfortrachealintubationinthesniffingpositionbymacintoshlaryngoscopy
AT prakashavinash randomisedcomparativestudyoncustomisedversusfixedsizedpillowfortrachealintubationinthesniffingpositionbymacintoshlaryngoscopy
AT sahoosarasak randomisedcomparativestudyoncustomisedversusfixedsizedpillowfortrachealintubationinthesniffingpositionbymacintoshlaryngoscopy
AT narayananilkumar randomisedcomparativestudyoncustomisedversusfixedsizedpillowfortrachealintubationinthesniffingpositionbymacintoshlaryngoscopy