Cargando…

Risk-Sharing Agreements in the EU: A Systematic Review of Major Trends

OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to explore the changes in the level of interest in risk-sharing agreements (RSAs) in the EU during the last 15 years and the underlying reasons for these changes. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piatkiewicz, Trevor Jozef, Traulsen, Janine Marie, Holm-Larsen, Tove
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5972115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0044-1
_version_ 1783326373025153024
author Piatkiewicz, Trevor Jozef
Traulsen, Janine Marie
Holm-Larsen, Tove
author_facet Piatkiewicz, Trevor Jozef
Traulsen, Janine Marie
Holm-Larsen, Tove
author_sort Piatkiewicz, Trevor Jozef
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to explore the changes in the level of interest in risk-sharing agreements (RSAs) in the EU during the last 15 years and the underlying reasons for these changes. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Articles identified were divided into ‘quantitative articles’ used to establish the level of interest and ‘qualitative articles’ used to identify the underlying trends in RSAs. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 2144 scientific articles. Data were extracted from 238 articles. Of these, 100 contained quantitative data and 138 contained qualitative data. The pace of articles being published about RSAs grew significantly in 2015, which related to the increase in interest in and knowledge about RSAs. The underlying reasons for the fluctuations were condensed into four overall themes: (1) push for value-based pricing, (2) economic crisis and further push to contain costs, (3) criticism of RSAs in the real world, and (4) diversification of RSAs to fit the purpose. CONCLUSION: The overall level of interest in RSAs in the EU has been increasing since 2000; therefore, articles reporting the number of RSAs implemented and case studies have been steadily growing as evidence is becoming more readily available. The number of qualitative articles reporting and discussing the underlying reasons for these changes in interest has largely fluctuated over the last 15 years. Despite these fluctuations, interest in RSAs remains high. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41669-017-0044-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5972115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59721152018-07-06 Risk-Sharing Agreements in the EU: A Systematic Review of Major Trends Piatkiewicz, Trevor Jozef Traulsen, Janine Marie Holm-Larsen, Tove Pharmacoecon Open Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to explore the changes in the level of interest in risk-sharing agreements (RSAs) in the EU during the last 15 years and the underlying reasons for these changes. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Articles identified were divided into ‘quantitative articles’ used to establish the level of interest and ‘qualitative articles’ used to identify the underlying trends in RSAs. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 2144 scientific articles. Data were extracted from 238 articles. Of these, 100 contained quantitative data and 138 contained qualitative data. The pace of articles being published about RSAs grew significantly in 2015, which related to the increase in interest in and knowledge about RSAs. The underlying reasons for the fluctuations were condensed into four overall themes: (1) push for value-based pricing, (2) economic crisis and further push to contain costs, (3) criticism of RSAs in the real world, and (4) diversification of RSAs to fit the purpose. CONCLUSION: The overall level of interest in RSAs in the EU has been increasing since 2000; therefore, articles reporting the number of RSAs implemented and case studies have been steadily growing as evidence is becoming more readily available. The number of qualitative articles reporting and discussing the underlying reasons for these changes in interest has largely fluctuated over the last 15 years. Despite these fluctuations, interest in RSAs remains high. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41669-017-0044-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5972115/ /pubmed/29623619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0044-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Piatkiewicz, Trevor Jozef
Traulsen, Janine Marie
Holm-Larsen, Tove
Risk-Sharing Agreements in the EU: A Systematic Review of Major Trends
title Risk-Sharing Agreements in the EU: A Systematic Review of Major Trends
title_full Risk-Sharing Agreements in the EU: A Systematic Review of Major Trends
title_fullStr Risk-Sharing Agreements in the EU: A Systematic Review of Major Trends
title_full_unstemmed Risk-Sharing Agreements in the EU: A Systematic Review of Major Trends
title_short Risk-Sharing Agreements in the EU: A Systematic Review of Major Trends
title_sort risk-sharing agreements in the eu: a systematic review of major trends
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5972115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0044-1
work_keys_str_mv AT piatkiewicztrevorjozef risksharingagreementsintheeuasystematicreviewofmajortrends
AT traulsenjaninemarie risksharingagreementsintheeuasystematicreviewofmajortrends
AT holmlarsentove risksharingagreementsintheeuasystematicreviewofmajortrends