Cargando…

Impulse-Control Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Case–Control Studies

BACKGROUND: Although several case–control studies on the prevalence of Impulse-Control Disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) have been conducted, no meta-analytic study on this topic has previously been published. Thus, knowledge about the overall prevalence rate of ICD in PD and factors that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molde, Helge, Moussavi, Yasaman, Kopperud, Stine Therese, Erga, Aleksander Hagen, Hansen, Anita Lill, Pallesen, Ståle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5972311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29872418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00330
_version_ 1783326415902474240
author Molde, Helge
Moussavi, Yasaman
Kopperud, Stine Therese
Erga, Aleksander Hagen
Hansen, Anita Lill
Pallesen, Ståle
author_facet Molde, Helge
Moussavi, Yasaman
Kopperud, Stine Therese
Erga, Aleksander Hagen
Hansen, Anita Lill
Pallesen, Ståle
author_sort Molde, Helge
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although several case–control studies on the prevalence of Impulse-Control Disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) have been conducted, no meta-analytic study on this topic has previously been published. Thus, knowledge about the overall prevalence rate of ICD in PD and factors that might moderate this relationship is lacking. METHOD: Prevalence studies of ICDs in PD were identified by computer searches in the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases, covering the period from January 2000 to February 2017. Data for N = 4,539, consisting of 2,371 PD patients and 2,168 healthy controls, representing 14 case–control studies were included. Estimation of the odds ratio (OR) of ICDs in PD compared to healthy controls was conducted using random-effects models. Mixed-effects models were applied in the moderator analysis of heterogeneity. Publication bias was estimated using a contour-enhanced funnel plot, the Rüker’s test, and fail-safe N test for estimating the number of potential missing studies. RESULTS: Overall, the results showed significantly higher ratios for several ICDs in PD compared to healthy controls with the estimated overall ORs ranging between 2.07, 95% CI [1.26, 3.48], for having any ICDs, and 4.26, 95% CI [2.17, 8.36], for hypersexuality. However, the random-effects results for shopping were non-significant, though the fixed-effects model was significant (OR = 1.66, 95%CI [1.21, 2.27]). The testing of potential moderator variables of heterogeneity identified the following two variables that were both associated with increased risk: being medically treated for PD and disease duration. The results must be interpreted with some caution due to possible small-studies effect or publication bias. CONCLUSION: Individuals with PD seem to have a significantly greater risk of suffering from ICDs compared to healthy controls. Gambling, hypersexuality, eating, punding, and hobbying are all ICDs significantly associated with PDs being medically treated for PD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5972311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59723112018-06-05 Impulse-Control Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Case–Control Studies Molde, Helge Moussavi, Yasaman Kopperud, Stine Therese Erga, Aleksander Hagen Hansen, Anita Lill Pallesen, Ståle Front Neurol Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Although several case–control studies on the prevalence of Impulse-Control Disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) have been conducted, no meta-analytic study on this topic has previously been published. Thus, knowledge about the overall prevalence rate of ICD in PD and factors that might moderate this relationship is lacking. METHOD: Prevalence studies of ICDs in PD were identified by computer searches in the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases, covering the period from January 2000 to February 2017. Data for N = 4,539, consisting of 2,371 PD patients and 2,168 healthy controls, representing 14 case–control studies were included. Estimation of the odds ratio (OR) of ICDs in PD compared to healthy controls was conducted using random-effects models. Mixed-effects models were applied in the moderator analysis of heterogeneity. Publication bias was estimated using a contour-enhanced funnel plot, the Rüker’s test, and fail-safe N test for estimating the number of potential missing studies. RESULTS: Overall, the results showed significantly higher ratios for several ICDs in PD compared to healthy controls with the estimated overall ORs ranging between 2.07, 95% CI [1.26, 3.48], for having any ICDs, and 4.26, 95% CI [2.17, 8.36], for hypersexuality. However, the random-effects results for shopping were non-significant, though the fixed-effects model was significant (OR = 1.66, 95%CI [1.21, 2.27]). The testing of potential moderator variables of heterogeneity identified the following two variables that were both associated with increased risk: being medically treated for PD and disease duration. The results must be interpreted with some caution due to possible small-studies effect or publication bias. CONCLUSION: Individuals with PD seem to have a significantly greater risk of suffering from ICDs compared to healthy controls. Gambling, hypersexuality, eating, punding, and hobbying are all ICDs significantly associated with PDs being medically treated for PD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5972311/ /pubmed/29872418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00330 Text en Copyright © 2018 Molde, Moussavi, Kopperud, Erga, Hansen and Pallesen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Molde, Helge
Moussavi, Yasaman
Kopperud, Stine Therese
Erga, Aleksander Hagen
Hansen, Anita Lill
Pallesen, Ståle
Impulse-Control Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Case–Control Studies
title Impulse-Control Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Case–Control Studies
title_full Impulse-Control Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Case–Control Studies
title_fullStr Impulse-Control Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Case–Control Studies
title_full_unstemmed Impulse-Control Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Case–Control Studies
title_short Impulse-Control Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Case–Control Studies
title_sort impulse-control disorders in parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis and review of case–control studies
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5972311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29872418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00330
work_keys_str_mv AT moldehelge impulsecontroldisordersinparkinsonsdiseaseametaanalysisandreviewofcasecontrolstudies
AT moussaviyasaman impulsecontroldisordersinparkinsonsdiseaseametaanalysisandreviewofcasecontrolstudies
AT kopperudstinetherese impulsecontroldisordersinparkinsonsdiseaseametaanalysisandreviewofcasecontrolstudies
AT ergaaleksanderhagen impulsecontroldisordersinparkinsonsdiseaseametaanalysisandreviewofcasecontrolstudies
AT hansenanitalill impulsecontroldisordersinparkinsonsdiseaseametaanalysisandreviewofcasecontrolstudies
AT pallesenstale impulsecontroldisordersinparkinsonsdiseaseametaanalysisandreviewofcasecontrolstudies