Cargando…

肺叶与亚肺叶切除治疗60岁以上Ia期小细胞肺癌的预后比较分析

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Currently, the prognosis of lobectomy and sub-lobectomy for the treatment of stage Ia small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is rarely reported. We retrospectively studied T1N0M0 (≤3 cm) SCLC patients aged ≥60 years, aiming to comparatively analyze the prognosis of lobectomy and sub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5972352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29357967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.01.02
_version_ 1783326424885624832
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Currently, the prognosis of lobectomy and sub-lobectomy for the treatment of stage Ia small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is rarely reported. We retrospectively studied T1N0M0 (≤3 cm) SCLC patients aged ≥60 years, aiming to comparatively analyze the prognosis of lobectomy and sub-lobectomy in treating patients with Ia SCLC. METHODS: Patients with stage Ia SCLC diagnosed by pathologic between 1992 and 2010 were selected from the "Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database"(SEER). Outcome data were compared using Kaplan-Meier (Log-rank test) and Cox model multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We identified 515 patients. Median overall survival (OS) of the lobectomy (n=110), sublobar resection (n=57) and non-surgical (n=348) cohort were 45, 23 and 16 months, respectively. The corresponding 5-year OS of the three groups were 44%, 30%, and 14%, respectively. No significant difference in the prognosis of patients with or without lymph node examination/ dissection (P=0.107) and the 5-year OS of patients underwent lobectomy with chemoradiation was 50%. Cox multivariable analysis showed that operation treatment, including lobectomy and sublobectomy, was one of the independent factors associated with the prognosis of early SCLC patients, and patients undergo lobectomy shows a better OS compared with sublobar resection (Lob vs Sub, HR=0.645; 95%CI: 0.433-0.961, P=0.031). CONCLUSION: For age ≥60 years T1N0M0 (≤3 cm) SCLC patients, we recommend anatomical lobectomy combined with adjuvant chemoradiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5972352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher 中国肺癌杂志编辑部
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59723522018-07-06 肺叶与亚肺叶切除治疗60岁以上Ia期小细胞肺癌的预后比较分析 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Currently, the prognosis of lobectomy and sub-lobectomy for the treatment of stage Ia small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is rarely reported. We retrospectively studied T1N0M0 (≤3 cm) SCLC patients aged ≥60 years, aiming to comparatively analyze the prognosis of lobectomy and sub-lobectomy in treating patients with Ia SCLC. METHODS: Patients with stage Ia SCLC diagnosed by pathologic between 1992 and 2010 were selected from the "Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database"(SEER). Outcome data were compared using Kaplan-Meier (Log-rank test) and Cox model multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We identified 515 patients. Median overall survival (OS) of the lobectomy (n=110), sublobar resection (n=57) and non-surgical (n=348) cohort were 45, 23 and 16 months, respectively. The corresponding 5-year OS of the three groups were 44%, 30%, and 14%, respectively. No significant difference in the prognosis of patients with or without lymph node examination/ dissection (P=0.107) and the 5-year OS of patients underwent lobectomy with chemoradiation was 50%. Cox multivariable analysis showed that operation treatment, including lobectomy and sublobectomy, was one of the independent factors associated with the prognosis of early SCLC patients, and patients undergo lobectomy shows a better OS compared with sublobar resection (Lob vs Sub, HR=0.645; 95%CI: 0.433-0.961, P=0.031). CONCLUSION: For age ≥60 years T1N0M0 (≤3 cm) SCLC patients, we recommend anatomical lobectomy combined with adjuvant chemoradiation. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2018-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5972352/ /pubmed/29357967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.01.02 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle 临床研究
肺叶与亚肺叶切除治疗60岁以上Ia期小细胞肺癌的预后比较分析
title 肺叶与亚肺叶切除治疗60岁以上Ia期小细胞肺癌的预后比较分析
title_full 肺叶与亚肺叶切除治疗60岁以上Ia期小细胞肺癌的预后比较分析
title_fullStr 肺叶与亚肺叶切除治疗60岁以上Ia期小细胞肺癌的预后比较分析
title_full_unstemmed 肺叶与亚肺叶切除治疗60岁以上Ia期小细胞肺癌的预后比较分析
title_short 肺叶与亚肺叶切除治疗60岁以上Ia期小细胞肺癌的预后比较分析
title_sort 肺叶与亚肺叶切除治疗60岁以上ia期小细胞肺癌的预后比较分析
topic 临床研究
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5972352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29357967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.01.02
work_keys_str_mv AT fèiyèyǔyàfèiyèqièchúzhìliáo60suìyǐshàngiaqīxiǎoxìbāofèiáideyùhòubǐjiàofēnxī
AT fèiyèyǔyàfèiyèqièchúzhìliáo60suìyǐshàngiaqīxiǎoxìbāofèiáideyùhòubǐjiàofēnxī
AT fèiyèyǔyàfèiyèqièchúzhìliáo60suìyǐshàngiaqīxiǎoxìbāofèiáideyùhòubǐjiàofēnxī
AT fèiyèyǔyàfèiyèqièchúzhìliáo60suìyǐshàngiaqīxiǎoxìbāofèiáideyùhòubǐjiàofēnxī
AT fèiyèyǔyàfèiyèqièchúzhìliáo60suìyǐshàngiaqīxiǎoxìbāofèiáideyùhòubǐjiàofēnxī