Cargando…

中文版莱斯特咳嗽问卷的改良及验证

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients often have cough after lung surgery, and there is a lack of tools to specifically assess postoperative coughs. LCQ-MC (Leicester Cough Questionnaire in Mandarin-Chinese) was revised and validated to explore its value on clinical application. METHODS: A total of 250...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5972941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28738962
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2017.07.05
_version_ 1783326499180380160
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients often have cough after lung surgery, and there is a lack of tools to specifically assess postoperative coughs. LCQ-MC (Leicester Cough Questionnaire in Mandarin-Chinese) was revised and validated to explore its value on clinical application. METHODS: A total of 250 patients undergone the lung operation of single medical team, from September 2015 to December 2016 in the Department ofThoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, were investigated. Among them, 121 patients completed LCQ-MC and 129 patients completed simplified LCQ-MC, we verified the reliability and validity. RESULTS: The new questionnaire was not changed in terms of content layout and the scoring method of LCQ-MC, consisting of 12 items and three domains (physical, psychological and social). There was good content validity (S-CVI/UA=0.83). Concurrent validity was high when the simplified LCQ-MC was compared with daytime cough symptom score (r=-0.578, P < 0.001). There was a moderate relationship with response to night-time cough symptom score (r=-0.358, P=-0.004) and SF36 total score (r=0.346, P=0.030), and weak relationship with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total score (r=-0.241, P=0.046). Cronbach's alpha coefficients of simplified LCQ-CM total and three domains varied between 0.79 and 0.89. One week apart test-retest reliability (n=30) was high (r=0.88-0.96). CONCLUSION: Simplified LCQ-MC has good reliability and validity that can be used for clinical applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5972941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher 中国肺癌杂志编辑部
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59729412018-07-06 中文版莱斯特咳嗽问卷的改良及验证 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients often have cough after lung surgery, and there is a lack of tools to specifically assess postoperative coughs. LCQ-MC (Leicester Cough Questionnaire in Mandarin-Chinese) was revised and validated to explore its value on clinical application. METHODS: A total of 250 patients undergone the lung operation of single medical team, from September 2015 to December 2016 in the Department ofThoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, were investigated. Among them, 121 patients completed LCQ-MC and 129 patients completed simplified LCQ-MC, we verified the reliability and validity. RESULTS: The new questionnaire was not changed in terms of content layout and the scoring method of LCQ-MC, consisting of 12 items and three domains (physical, psychological and social). There was good content validity (S-CVI/UA=0.83). Concurrent validity was high when the simplified LCQ-MC was compared with daytime cough symptom score (r=-0.578, P < 0.001). There was a moderate relationship with response to night-time cough symptom score (r=-0.358, P=-0.004) and SF36 total score (r=0.346, P=0.030), and weak relationship with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total score (r=-0.241, P=0.046). Cronbach's alpha coefficients of simplified LCQ-CM total and three domains varied between 0.79 and 0.89. One week apart test-retest reliability (n=30) was high (r=0.88-0.96). CONCLUSION: Simplified LCQ-MC has good reliability and validity that can be used for clinical applications. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5972941/ /pubmed/28738962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2017.07.05 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle 临床研究
中文版莱斯特咳嗽问卷的改良及验证
title 中文版莱斯特咳嗽问卷的改良及验证
title_full 中文版莱斯特咳嗽问卷的改良及验证
title_fullStr 中文版莱斯特咳嗽问卷的改良及验证
title_full_unstemmed 中文版莱斯特咳嗽问卷的改良及验证
title_short 中文版莱斯特咳嗽问卷的改良及验证
title_sort 中文版莱斯特咳嗽问卷的改良及验证
topic 临床研究
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5972941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28738962
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2017.07.05
work_keys_str_mv AT zhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuwènjuǎndegǎiliángjíyànzhèng
AT zhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuwènjuǎndegǎiliángjíyànzhèng
AT zhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuwènjuǎndegǎiliángjíyànzhèng
AT zhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuwènjuǎndegǎiliángjíyànzhèng
AT zhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuwènjuǎndegǎiliángjíyànzhèng
AT zhōngwénbǎnláisītèhāisòuwènjuǎndegǎiliángjíyànzhèng