Cargando…

阿帕替尼用于一线治疗进展后晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的疗效和生存分析

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of second or third-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is low. The use of targeted drugs brings survival benefit for some patients. Apatinib, as a novel small molecule antiangiogenic drug, has demonstrated satisfactory anti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5973272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2017.11.07
_version_ 1783326579612450816
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of second or third-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is low. The use of targeted drugs brings survival benefit for some patients. Apatinib, as a novel small molecule antiangiogenic drug, has demonstrated satisfactory anticancer activity across a broad range of malignancies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC after first-line treatment failure. METHODS: A retrospective study of 128 patients was conducted to evaluate the safety, short-term efficacy and survival status with different regimens. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were used for analysis. RESULTS: Compared with chemotherapy alone, the median progression free survival (PFS) in apatinib monotherapy, chemotherapy alone and apatinib combined with chemotherapy were 3.0 (P=0.381), 3.7 and 6.0 months (P < 0.001), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) were 6.0 (P=0.494), 6.5 and 9.0 months (P=0.001), respectively. The incidence of adverse events in grades 3-4 were 18.5%, 15.8% and 16.0%, respectively (P=0.947). Different treatment regimens (P=0.018) and performance status (PS)(P < 0.001) were the independent factors of PFS. The smoking history (P=0.014), treatment regimens (P=0.002) and PS (P < 0.001) were independent influencing factors of OS. CONCLUSION: Apatinib has a good security. After first-line treatment failure of lung cancer, chemotherapy combined with apatinib in second or third-line is beneficial in PFS and OS when compared with chemotherapy alone. But when making comparison between apatinib monotherapy and chemotherapy alone, there is no significant difference in PFS and OS. Patients who never smoke or has a better PS or use combination therapy have longer survival time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5973272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher 中国肺癌杂志编辑部
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59732722018-07-06 阿帕替尼用于一线治疗进展后晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的疗效和生存分析 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of second or third-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is low. The use of targeted drugs brings survival benefit for some patients. Apatinib, as a novel small molecule antiangiogenic drug, has demonstrated satisfactory anticancer activity across a broad range of malignancies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC after first-line treatment failure. METHODS: A retrospective study of 128 patients was conducted to evaluate the safety, short-term efficacy and survival status with different regimens. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were used for analysis. RESULTS: Compared with chemotherapy alone, the median progression free survival (PFS) in apatinib monotherapy, chemotherapy alone and apatinib combined with chemotherapy were 3.0 (P=0.381), 3.7 and 6.0 months (P < 0.001), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) were 6.0 (P=0.494), 6.5 and 9.0 months (P=0.001), respectively. The incidence of adverse events in grades 3-4 were 18.5%, 15.8% and 16.0%, respectively (P=0.947). Different treatment regimens (P=0.018) and performance status (PS)(P < 0.001) were the independent factors of PFS. The smoking history (P=0.014), treatment regimens (P=0.002) and PS (P < 0.001) were independent influencing factors of OS. CONCLUSION: Apatinib has a good security. After first-line treatment failure of lung cancer, chemotherapy combined with apatinib in second or third-line is beneficial in PFS and OS when compared with chemotherapy alone. But when making comparison between apatinib monotherapy and chemotherapy alone, there is no significant difference in PFS and OS. Patients who never smoke or has a better PS or use combination therapy have longer survival time. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2017-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5973272/ /pubmed/29167006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2017.11.07 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle 临床研究
阿帕替尼用于一线治疗进展后晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的疗效和生存分析
title 阿帕替尼用于一线治疗进展后晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的疗效和生存分析
title_full 阿帕替尼用于一线治疗进展后晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的疗效和生存分析
title_fullStr 阿帕替尼用于一线治疗进展后晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的疗效和生存分析
title_full_unstemmed 阿帕替尼用于一线治疗进展后晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的疗效和生存分析
title_short 阿帕替尼用于一线治疗进展后晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的疗效和生存分析
title_sort 阿帕替尼用于一线治疗进展后晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌的疗效和生存分析
topic 临床研究
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5973272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2017.11.07
work_keys_str_mv AT āpàtìníyòngyúyīxiànzhìliáojìnzhǎnhòuwǎnqīfēilínfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáideliáoxiàohéshēngcúnfēnxī
AT āpàtìníyòngyúyīxiànzhìliáojìnzhǎnhòuwǎnqīfēilínfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáideliáoxiàohéshēngcúnfēnxī
AT āpàtìníyòngyúyīxiànzhìliáojìnzhǎnhòuwǎnqīfēilínfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáideliáoxiàohéshēngcúnfēnxī
AT āpàtìníyòngyúyīxiànzhìliáojìnzhǎnhòuwǎnqīfēilínfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáideliáoxiàohéshēngcúnfēnxī
AT āpàtìníyòngyúyīxiànzhìliáojìnzhǎnhòuwǎnqīfēilínfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáideliáoxiàohéshēngcúnfēnxī
AT āpàtìníyòngyúyīxiànzhìliáojìnzhǎnhòuwǎnqīfēilínfēixiǎoxìbāofèiáideliáoxiàohéshēngcúnfēnxī